Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Tomato root growth in compost substrates was similar to or greater than in pine bark.

A claim from (45) Root Growth of Three Horticultural Crops Grown in Pine Bark-amended Cotton Gin Compost · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tomato root growth in compost substrates was similar to or greater than in pine bark.

Material
Blitze0
Treatment
substrates containing CGCe1
Outcome
Root growthe1
Direction
similar to or more enhancede1
Comparator
100% PBe1

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“`Blitz' tomato ( Lycopersicon esculentum )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 470–512
e1

“Root growth of all species in substrates containing CGC was similar to or more enhanced than root growth in 100% PB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1289–1404

Title

(45) Root Growth of Three Horticultural Crops Grown in Pine Bark-amended Cotton Gin Compost

Brian E. Jackson; Amy N. Wright; Jeff L. Sibley HortScience 2006. doi:10.21273/hortsci.41.4.1054c

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e0a74d6477cdc2d2d89eb8d02c552cd2dda95de4ae552f46c059e96432a20277 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

Gossypium hirsutum · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

growing medium · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

169 papers: 126 positive, 43 negative or no effect

125 papers in the same direction as this claim · 33 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

160 papers more in this group

See all 169 papers →

fertilization · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

668 papers: 567 positive, 101 negative or no effect

566 papers in the same direction as this claim · 93 in the opposite direction · 8 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

659 papers more in this group

See all 668 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.