Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Incubating rock phosphate in organic manures with PSB improved nutrient availability for both wheat and chickpea.

A claim from Effect of Rock Phosphate along with Organic Manures on Soil Properties, Yield and Nutrient Uptake by Wheat and Chickpea · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incubating rock phosphate in organic manures with PSB improved nutrient availability for both wheat and chickpea.

Taxon
wheat and chickpeaCicer arietinumTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
incubation of RP in organic manures and PSBe2
Outcome
availability of major nutrientse2
Direction
increasinge2
Setting
Rahuri, Maharashtrae1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Two separate field experiments were conducted at Post Graduate Institute, Mahatma Phule Agricultural University, Rahuri, Maharashtra on wheat and chickpea crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–160
e2

“The incubation of RP in organic manures and PSB proved better for increasing the availability of major nutrients for both crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–728

Title

Effect of Rock Phosphate along with Organic Manures on Soil Properties, Yield and Nutrient Uptake by Wheat and Chickpea

A.N. Deshpande; S.S. Dalavi; S.H. Pandey; et al. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 2015. doi:10.5958/0974-0228.2015.00013.4

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e311d9bfe1f13f451414ed948e5098ce9d04588741241f92c1d969ddd8c7610b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 37 positive, 1 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    P stress decreased total uptake of all ions.

    Mineral nutrition of chickpea plants supplied with NO3 or NH4-N · 1990

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
    Application of phosphorus up to 26 kg P/ha to chickpea improved total N and P uptake by the cropping system.

    Direct and Residual Effect of Vermicompost, Biofertilizers and Phosphorus on Soil Nutrient Dynamics and Productivity of Chickpea-Fodder Maize Sequence · 2006

    Same direction

  3. positive
    Shoot N and P accumulation in chickpea increased with P application.

    Nitrogen and phosphorus fertility management for desi and kabuli chickpea · 2005

    Same direction

  4. positive
    OM plus SP and OM plus PR enhanced P, K and Mg acquisition.

    Phosphorus source, organic matter, and arbuscular mycorrhiza effects on growth and mineral acquisition of chickpea grown in acidic soil · 2000

    Same direction

  5. positive
    RP, PM and MN-54 raised nutrient uptake by 31–36% versus controls.

    Improving Nutrient Uptake, Growth, Yield and Protein Content in Chickpea by the Co-Addition of Phosphorus Fertilizers, Organic Manures, and Bacillus sp. MN-54 · 2021 · compared with control treatments

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Phosphorus above 60 kg ha−1 significantly increased grain phosphorus content in all four varieties.

    Growth and yield of different varieties of chickpea (Cicer arietinuml.) as influenced by the phosphorus nutrition under rainfed conditions on vertisols · 2014

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Burkholderia sp. 12F inoculation increased chickpea P uptake with rock phosphate fertilization.

    Is phosphate solubilizing ability in plant growth‐promoting rhizobacteria isolated from chickpea linked to their ability to produce ACC deaminase? · 2021

    Same direction

  8. positive
    30 kg P2O5 ha-1 significantly increased chickpea N and P content in seed and straw over control and 15 kg P2O5 ha-1.

    Effect of phosphorus and biofertilizers on productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) in North Western Rajasthan, India. · 2013 · compared with control and 15 kg P2O5 ha-1

    Same direction

29 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 57 positive, 6 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Mycorrhizal inoculation reduced N, P, K and Zn uptake in chickpea.

    INTERACTION BETWEEN VA-MYCORRHIZAL FUNGI AND SOIL - BORNE PLANT PATHOGENS OF CHICKPEA · 2004

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Pathogen inoculation reduced chickpea nitrogen content by 66% at 30 DAS.

    Screening and Testing the Effect of Biocontrol Agents (Bacillus sp.) and Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri strains (Wilt) on Plant Defense Enzymes in Chickpea · 2018

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Inoculant addition did not change seed Mn content in chickpea.

    CONTENT OF BIOGENIC ELEMENTS INDUCTED BY THE INFLUENCE OF THE INOCULANT IN SELECTED CHICKPEA SLOVAK VARIETIES · 2022 · compared with both variants

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Nematode inoculation impaired water absorption capability of chickpea roots.

    Effect of root‐knot and reniform nematodes alone and in combination on the chickpea · 1999

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Combined Mesorhizobium and PGPR inoculants were comparable to their inoculation alone on N and P uptake by crop.

    Performance of Liquid and Carrier-based Inoculants of Mesorhizobium ciceri and PGPR (Pseudomonas diminuta) in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) on Nodulation, Yield and Soil properties · 2011 · compared with inoculation alone

    No difference from an alternative

  6. no effect
    Rhizobium alone and dual inoculation did not differ significantly for chickpea leaf N and N uptake.

    Changes in root and nutrient uptake of chickpea affected by organic fertilizers and inoculation with arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi and Rhizobium · 2024 · compared with dual inoculation of mycorrhiza and Rhizobium

    No difference from an alternative

  7. positive
    Single inoculation with Pseudomonas PSB 5 increased chickpea phosphorus concentration by 8% above the uninoculated control.

    Synergistic effects of the inoculation with nitrogen‐fixing and phosphate‐solubilizing rhizobacteria on the performance of field‐grown chickpea · 2007 · compared with uninoculated control

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Bacterial inoculation increased grain iron content up to 18% in chickpea and 12% in pigeonpea.

    Plant growth-promotion and biofortification of chickpea and pigeonpea through inoculation of biocontrol potential bacteria, isolated from organic soils · 2016 · compared with un-inoculated control plots

    Same direction

54 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 80 positive, 1 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Normal animal manure with half DAP increased chickpea P by up to 97.8% versus control.

    Combined Effect of Animal Manures and Di-Ammonium Phosphate (DAP) on Growth, Physiology, Root Nodulation and Yield of Chickpea · 2022 · compared with control

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. no effect
    Fertilizer levels did not significantly affect postharvest soil available N, P2O5 and K2O.

    Effect of Nitrogen and Phosphorus on Nutrient Use Efficiency of Irrigated Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under Scarce Rainfall Zone of Andhra Pradesh, India · 2024

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Soil boron fertilization increased chickpea grain boron content two to fivefold.

    A COMPARISON OF THE EFFECTS OF MICRONUTRIENT SEED PRIMING AND SOIL FERTILIZATION ON THE MINERAL NUTRITION OF CHICKPEA (Cicer arietinum), LENTIL (Lens culinaris), RICE (Oryza sativa) AND WHEAT (Triticum aestivum) IN NEPAL · 2005

    Same direction

  4. positive
    Application of 3 t vermicompost/ha to chickpea improved total N and P uptake by the chickpea-maize cropping system over no vermicompost.

    Direct and Residual Effect of Vermicompost, Biofertilizers and Phosphorus on Soil Nutrient Dynamics and Productivity of Chickpea-Fodder Maize Sequence · 2006 · compared with no vermicompost

    Same direction

  5. positive
    Chickpea nitrogen contents in straw increased by 11%.

    Rock phosphate-enriched organic fertilizer with phosphate-solubilizing microorganisms improves nodulation, growth, and yield of legumes · 2018 · compared with control

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Under P drip fertigation, plant nutrient uptake was significantly improved compared with the unfertilized treatment.

    Interactive effect of soil moisture content and phosphorus fertilizer form on chickpea growth, photosynthesis, and nutrient uptake · 2022 · compared with unfertilized treatment

    Same direction

  7. positive
    RP, PM and MN-54 raised nutrient uptake by 31–36% versus controls.

    Improving Nutrient Uptake, Growth, Yield and Protein Content in Chickpea by the Co-Addition of Phosphorus Fertilizers, Organic Manures, and Bacillus sp. MN-54 · 2021 · compared with control treatments

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Polyphosphate fertigation significantly increased phosphorus absorption.

    Chickpea plant responses to polyphosphate fertiliser forms and drip fertigation frequencies: effect on photosynthetic performance and phenotypic traits · 2021

    Same direction

72 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

3 of 6 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.