Paper · 2015 · Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science

Effect of Rock Phosphate along with Organic Manures on Soil Properties, Yield and Nutrient Uptake by Wheat and Chickpea

A.N. Deshpande; S.S. Dalavi; S.H. Pandey; et al.

6
claims
13
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two separate field experiments were conducted at Post Graduate Institute, Mahatma Phule Agricultural University, Rahuri, Maharashtra on wheat and chickpea crops to test the effect of rock phosphate (RP) along with organic manures on an Inceptisols (Vertic Haplustepts) with ten treatments viz. absolute control, P control (recommended dose of N and K excluding P), recommended dose of N and K along with RP, RP+ phosphorus solubilizing bacteria (PSB), RP+pressmud cake+PSB, RP+FYM+PSB, RP+vermicompost + PSB, RP+fresh cow dung+PSB, RP+post biomethanated spentwash+PSB and single superphosphate (SSP). The incubation of RP in organic manures and PSB proved better for increasing the availability of major nutrients for both crops. Availability of P at 90 days after sowing and at harvest was significantly increased by incorporation of RP incubated with fresh cow dung and PSB. The nutrient uptake by both crops was also increased due to the application of RP with organic manures and PSB. This improvement in availability of nutrients ultimately resulted in significant increase in yield of both the crops over absolute control, P control and RP treatments. Among the organic manure treatments the availability of N and P and yield of both crops was highest in RP+fresh cow dung+PSB treatment.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Incubating rock phosphate in organic manures with PSB improved nutrient availability for both wheat and chickpea.

Taxon
wheat and chickpeaCicer arietinumTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
incubation of RP in organic manures and PSBe2
Outcome
availability of major nutrientse2
Direction
increasinge2
Setting
Rahuri, Maharashtrae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Two separate field experiments were conducted at Post Graduate Institute, Mahatma Phule Agricultural University, Rahuri, Maharashtra on wheat and chickpea crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
e2

“The incubation of RP in organic manures and PSB proved better for increasing the availability of major nutrients for both crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–728 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rock phosphate incubated with fresh cow dung and PSB significantly increased P availability at 90 days after sowing and at harvest.

Taxon
wheat and chickpeaCicer arietinumTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
incorporation of RP incubated with fresh cow dung and PSBe3
Outcome
Availability of Pe3
Direction
increasede3
Qualifier
at 90 days after sowing and at harveste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Two separate field experiments were conducted at Post Graduate Institute, Mahatma Phule Agricultural University, Rahuri, Maharashtra on wheat and chickpea crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
e3

“Availability of P at 90 days after sowing and at harvest was significantly increased by incorporation of RP incubated with fresh cow dung and PSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–875 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Applying rock phosphate with organic manures and PSB increased nutrient uptake by both wheat and chickpea.

Taxon
wheat and chickpeaCicer arietinumTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
application of RP with organic manures and PSBe4
Outcome
nutrient uptakee4
Direction
increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Two separate field experiments were conducted at Post Graduate Institute, Mahatma Phule Agricultural University, Rahuri, Maharashtra on wheat and chickpea crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
e4

“The nutrient uptake by both crops was also increased due to the application of RP with organic manures and PSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rock phosphate with organic manures and PSB significantly increased yield of both crops over absolute control, P control and RP treatments.

Taxon
wheat and chickpeaCicer arietinumTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
application of RP with organic manures and PSBe4
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
increasee5
Comparator
absolute control, P control and RP treatmentse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Two separate field experiments were conducted at Post Graduate Institute, Mahatma Phule Agricultural University, Rahuri, Maharashtra on wheat and chickpea crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
e4

“The nutrient uptake by both crops was also increased due to the application of RP with organic manures and PSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–987 · show in text ↑
e5

“This improvement in availability of nutrients ultimately resulted in significant increase in yield of both the crops over absolute control, P control and RP treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1156 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among organic manure treatments, RP with fresh cow dung and PSB gave the highest availability of N and P in wheat and chickpea.

Taxon
wheat and chickpeaCicer arietinumTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
RP+fresh cow dung+PSBe6
Outcome
availability of N and Pe6
Direction
higheste6
Comparator
organic manure treatmentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Two separate field experiments were conducted at Post Graduate Institute, Mahatma Phule Agricultural University, Rahuri, Maharashtra on wheat and chickpea crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
e6

“Among the organic manure treatments the availability of N and P and yield of both crops was highest in RP+fresh cow dung+PSB treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1292 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Among organic manure treatments, RP with fresh cow dung and PSB gave the highest yield of both wheat and chickpea.

Taxon
wheat and chickpeaCicer arietinumTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
RP+fresh cow dung+PSBe6
Outcome
yield of both cropse6
Direction
higheste6
Comparator
organic manure treatmentse6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Two separate field experiments were conducted at Post Graduate Institute, Mahatma Phule Agricultural University, Rahuri, Maharashtra on wheat and chickpea crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–160 · show in text ↑
e6

“Among the organic manure treatments the availability of N and P and yield of both crops was highest in RP+fresh cow dung+PSB treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1158–1292 · show in text ↑

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

38 papers: 37 positive, 1 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 57 positive, 6 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 80 positive, 1 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 161 positive, 7 negative or no effect

160 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

213 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

226 papers: 198 positive, 28 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

222 papers more in this group

See all 226 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

277 papers: 263 positive, 14 negative or no effect

262 papers in the same direction as this paper · 13 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

273 papers more in this group

See all 277 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.