Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Rock phosphate with organic manures and PSB significantly increased yield of both crops over absolute control, P control and RP treatments.

A claim from Effect of Rock Phosphate along with Organic Manures on Soil Properties, Yield and Nutrient Uptake by Wheat and Chickpea · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rock phosphate with organic manures and PSB significantly increased yield of both crops over absolute control, P control and RP treatments.

Taxon
wheat and chickpeaCicer arietinumTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
application of RP with organic manures and PSBe4
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
increasee5
Comparator
absolute control, P control and RP treatmentse5

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Two separate field experiments were conducted at Post Graduate Institute, Mahatma Phule Agricultural University, Rahuri, Maharashtra on wheat and chickpea crops”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–160
e4

“The nutrient uptake by both crops was also increased due to the application of RP with organic manures and PSB”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–987
e5

“This improvement in availability of nutrients ultimately resulted in significant increase in yield of both the crops over absolute control, P control and RP treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1156

Title

Effect of Rock Phosphate along with Organic Manures on Soil Properties, Yield and Nutrient Uptake by Wheat and Chickpea

A.N. Deshpande; S.S. Dalavi; S.H. Pandey; et al. Journal of the Indian Society of Soil Science 2015. doi:10.5958/0974-0228.2015.00013.4

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-e5baeeabe6b241cb21afc21a95e224b40539c2e98d67208c9cfb7e9d0a6e1464 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

phosphorus · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 161 positive, 7 negative or no effect

160 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    DAP with PSB did not significantly affect seeds per pod or harvest index of chickpea.

    Effect of basal and foliar application of diammonium phosphate in cognizance with phosphate-solubilizing bacteria on growth, yield and quality of rainfed chickpea (Cicer arietinum) · 2024

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    With further phosphorus addition to 90 kg P2O5 ha-1, yield and the Mn and Fe contents and uptake decreased.

    Effect of Phosphorus and Sulphur on Concentration and Uptake of Micronutrients in Chickpea · 1992

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Yield improvement with further P application was lower than with 0.5 mg P/100 g in chickpea.

    Chickpea and Lentil Varietal Response to Phosphorus Supply · 1996 · compared with 0.5mg P/100g

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Harvest index was not significantly affected by phosphorus levels.

    Study on the Effects of Phosphorus Levels on Growth and Yield of Chickpea (Cicer aritinum L.) · 2018

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Phosphorus rates of 20, 25 and 30 kg P2 O5/ha did not significantly influence vegetable-grain yield.

    Irrigation, seed rate and phosphorus management in vegetable grain chickpea (Cicer arietinum) · 2016

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Phosphorus applications did not affect 100 seed weight.

    THE EFFECT OF PHOSPHORUS DOSES ON CHICKPEA CULTIVARS UNDER RAINFALL CONDITIONS · 2014

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Chickpea yield with P. fluorescens seed treatment plus soil application (7.02 q/ha) remained at par with the Benomyl treatment.

    Seed quality enhancement and maximization of yield through use of bioagents in chickpea · 2013 · compared with Benomyl at 2 ml/kg seed

    No difference from an alternative

  8. positive
    P increased chickpea seed yield by 11.1% over control.

    Influence of Nitrogen Fixing and Phosphorus Solubilizing Bacteria on the Nodulation, Plant Growth, and Yield of Chickpea · 2007 · compared with control

    Same direction

159 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    In a chickpea pot experiment, combining Rhizobium inoculation with seed priming had little effect on yield.

    The improvement of crop yield in marginal environments using ‘on-farm’ seed priming: nodulation, nitrogen fixation, and disease resistance · 2005

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Increasing R. solani inoculum reduced emergence and dry matter production.

    Etiology, impact and control of rhizoctonia seedling blight and root rot of chickpea on the Canadian prairies · 2003

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Chickpea Avrodhi grown in plots inoculated with F. oxysporum f. sp. ciceri and R. solani had a 22%-25% decrease in yield.

    Field performance of Trichoderma species against wilt disease complex of chickpea caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri and Rhizoctonia solani · 2014

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    S. rolfsii inoculation alone gave the lowest chickpea grain yield.

    Effect of soil amendment with Chenopodium album dry biomass and two Trichoderma species on growth of chickpea var. Noor 2009 in Sclerotium rolfsii contaminated soil · 2020 · compared with without any soil amendment

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Rhizobium inoculation had no effect on chickpea yield.

    Growth and yield of two chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) varieties in Canterbury, New Zealand · 1995

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    M. incognita inoculation decreased chickpea yield by 24%.

    Laboratory and field performance of some soil bacteria used as seed treatments on Meloidogyne incognita in chickpea · 2012

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Field growth, shoot P concentration and seed yield were unaffected by VAMF inoculation.

    Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhiza and Phosphorus Uptake of Chickpea Grown in Northern Syria · 1992

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    S. rolfsii reduced grain dry weight by 49%.

    ALLEVIATING STRESS OF SCLERTIUM ROLFSII ON GROWTH OF CHICKPEA VAR. BHAKKAR-2011 BY TRICHODERMA HARZIANUM AND T. VIRIDE · 2021 · compared with negative control

    Opposite direction

208 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Animal manure with DAP significantly improved chickpea growth, yield and physiological traits.

    Combined Effect of Animal Manures and Di-Ammonium Phosphate (DAP) on Growth, Physiology, Root Nodulation and Yield of Chickpea · 2022

    Same directionCites this paper

  2. no effect
    Chickpea grain yield was unaffected by fertilizer nitrogen supply and ranged from 2.0–2.4 t/ha.

    Nitrogen fixation and soil nitrate interactions in field-grown chickpea ( Cicer arietinum ) and fababean ( Vicia faba ) · 2002

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Nitrogen fertilization had no significant effect on nutrient uptake and biomass production.

    Arbuscular mycorrhiza enhances nutrient uptake in chickpea · 2011

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Field growth, shoot P concentration and seed yield were unaffected by P fertilization.

    Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhiza and Phosphorus Uptake of Chickpea Grown in Northern Syria · 1992

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Nitrogen fertilizer did not increase seed yield in either legume.

    Effect of irrigation on growth and yield of Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). · 2008

    Opposite direction

  6. no effect
    Phosphorus fertilization did not affect chickpea yield components.

    Effect of Different Soil Tillage, Weed Control and Phosphorus Fertilization on Weed Biomas, Protein and Phosphorus Content of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2006

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    A 25% fertilizer reduction lowered chickpea seed yield by 6.6% in 2005-06.

    Effect of row ratio and fertility levels on chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and linseed (Linum usitatissimum) intercropping system · 2001 · compared with RDF

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    In area 02, nitrogen fertilization did not interfere with the remaining production variables of chickpea.

    Inoculation of Bacillus spp. and nitrogen levels increase chickpea production · 2021

    Opposite direction

336 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

3 of 6 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.