Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sequential isoproturon and 2,4-D increased grain yield by 38.0% over weedy check in reduced tillage.

A claim from Studies on the Effect of Herbicides Under Different Tillage Practices in Wheat · 2005

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sequential isoproturon and 2,4-D increased grain yield by 38.0% over weedy check in reduced tillage.

Treatment
isoproturon fb 2, 4-De0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
38.0e0
Comparator
weedy checke0
Setting
reducede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“On an average, isoproturon fb 2, 4-D increased the grain yield by 42.3, 38.0 and 39.1% over weedy check in zero, reduced and conventional tillage, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 741–900
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78

Title

Studies on the Effect of Herbicides Under Different Tillage Practices in Wheat

Alok Sinha; R. P. Singh Indian Journal of Weed Science 2005

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-e488db071d687779bb2df1549f99e2f9a5cd5cb7e9cfb6aae1a009f0997e5a04 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

isoproturon · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

89 papers: 75 positive, 14 negative or no effect

74 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

80 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

2,4-D · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

116 papers: 78 positive, 38 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this claim · 34 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.