Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nano calcium 50 mg L-1 plus conventional calcium 150 mg L-1 on the Queen variety gave the highest significant stem diameter, 14.4667 mm.

A claim from A comparison between the effect of Nano and traditional calcium fertilizer on growth and anatomical traits of two tomato cultivars · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano calcium 50 mg L-1 plus conventional calcium 150 mg L-1 on the Queen variety gave the highest significant stem diameter, 14.4667 mm.

Material
Queene0
Treatment
Nano calcium 50 mg L-1 + conventional calcium 150 mg L-1e0
Outcome
stem diametere0
Direction
higheste0
Value
14.4667 mm stem-1e0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the treatment (Nano calcium 50 mg L-1 + conventional calcium 150 mg L-1) intercropped with the Queen variety gave the highest significant value in stem diameter, reaching 14.4667 mm stem-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2555–2743
t0

“two tomato cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 110–130

Title

A comparison between the effect of Nano and traditional calcium fertilizer on growth and anatomical traits of two tomato cultivars

Mostafa A. Abbas; Fathel F. R. Ibraheem International Journal of Environmental Sciences 2025. doi:10.64252/9p6nnc58

Other claims from this paper (18)

Record rev-e75c067023bfb012f8e79dea59a85782a04b5e6c004d4156699925b2a659a3b8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 15 in the model’s answer

calcium atom · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

60 papers: 54 positive, 6 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

51 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

100 papers: 94 positive, 6 negative or no effect

93 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

91 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.