Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined inoculation gave higher grain yield than rhizobium in the second year by 35.44%.

A claim from Response of biofertilizers and phytohormone on growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinium L.) · 2012

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined inoculation gave higher grain yield than rhizobium in the second year by 35.44%.

Taxon
chickpea (Cicer arietinium L.)Cicer arietinumt0
Treatment
combined inoculation of Rhizobium + PSB + VAMe0
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
35.44e0
Qualifier
second yeare0
Comparator
rhizobiume0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the biofertilizers, combined inoculation of Rhizobium + PSB + VAM produced higher grain yield amounting 60.17, 35.35, 17.60 and 13.32 % in first year and 58.64, 35.44, 18.24 and 15.15 % in second year higher kernel yield over no inoculation, rhizobium, phosphate solubilizing bacteria, vesicular arbuscular mycorrhizae respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 832–1170
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinium L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–97

Title

Response of biofertilizers and phytohormone on growth and yield of chickpea (Cicer arietinium L.)

Krishna Pramanik; A. K. Bera Journal of Crop and Weed 2012

Other claims from this paper (15)

Record rev-e8b234d99bc8e8398dbd01a801352cea73f488cb7fa69c7a636ddfe71343ac3a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

120 papers: 116 positive, 4 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

111 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

27 papers: 26 positive, 1 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

208 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.