Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Calcium fertilizer improved Munage grape quality over other sprays.

A claim from Application of Different Foliar Fertilizer on Three Varieties of Grapes · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium fertilizer improved Munage grape quality over other sprays.

Taxon
grapee0
Material
Munagee0
Treatment
spraying amino acid chelated calcium liquid fertilizere0
Outcome
qualitye0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
other two fertilizer spraying treatmentse0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“For Red globe grape and Munage grape of Aksu,spraying amino acid chelated calcium liquid fertilizer got the best effect with the yield increment of 8.50% and 17.15% respectively,significantly higher than other two fertilizer spraying treatments,and the quality was also better than that of them”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–1083

Title

Application of Different Foliar Fertilizer on Three Varieties of Grapes

Luo QiangWei Xibei nongye xuebao 2010

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-e9c9532b8c56a055b7957e9c220b3c3efcd5b3c2ddfcd0000f7c91bf91a62c43 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

calcium atom · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

application · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results

32 papers: 26 positive, 6 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. positive
  8. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 32 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results

38 papers: 28 positive, 10 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

29 papers more in this group

See all 38 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.