Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Amino acid chelated calcium fertilizer increased Red globe grape yield by 8.50%, outperforming other sprays.

A claim from Application of Different Foliar Fertilizer on Three Varieties of Grapes · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Amino acid chelated calcium fertilizer increased Red globe grape yield by 8.50%, outperforming other sprays.

Taxon
grapee0
Material
Red globee0
Treatment
spraying amino acid chelated calcium liquid fertilizere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
incremente0
Value
8.50%e0
Comparator
other two fertilizer spraying treatmentse0
Setting
Aksue0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“For Red globe grape and Munage grape of Aksu,spraying amino acid chelated calcium liquid fertilizer got the best effect with the yield increment of 8.50% and 17.15% respectively,significantly higher than other two fertilizer spraying treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 789–1033

Title

Application of Different Foliar Fertilizer on Three Varieties of Grapes

Luo QiangWei Xibei nongye xuebao 2010

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-ee99ca2a7d35abb7779a08064f62ec3ba9a2ff162a3596bcd03a56dba940083b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

amino acid · yield · VitisResults agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
See all 5 papers →

calcium atom · yield · VitisResults agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
    Calcium omission outside December to mid-May decreased yield.

    Nutritional and physiological studies on grapevine. V. · 1963

    Same directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

  7. positive
  8. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ

107 papers: 97 positive, 10 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

98 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

3 of 4 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.