Abstract
Abstract The influence of B-Nine (2500 ppm), F 529 (1250 ppm), TIBA (250 ppm), IAA (100 ppm), Ethrel (1000 ppm), Cycocel spray (1475 ppm) and soil drench (2950 ppm) were investigated on seed propagated geranium, cv. ‘Carefree Scarlet’. IAA had no effect on date of flowering, plant height or branching, but TIBA sprayed plants flowered significantly earlier and Ethrel sprays significantly delayed it. Both TIBA and Ethrel sprays reduced geranium height at flowering and stimulated branching. A Cycocel soil drench caused earlier flowering, but sprays had no effect on flowering. In growth chambers with 12-hour light periods of 75 F and 12-hour dark periods of 70 F, 60 F, or 50 F, earliest flowering was at 70 F with 5 and 15 days delays at 60 F and 50 F. The number of nodes of terminal stems at flowering increased from 14 at 70 F to 16 at 60 F and 17 at 50 F night temperatures.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 15
Claim · model-written summary
IAA did not affect flowering date, height, or branching.
- Material
- Carefree Scarlete1
- Treatment
- IAAe0
- Outcome
- date of flowering, plant height or branchinge0
- Direction
- no effecte0
GeraniumNot reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“IAA had no effect on date of flowering, plant height or branching”
e1“seed propagated geranium, cv. ‘Carefree Scarlet’”
Claim · model-written summary
TIBA sprayed plants flowered significantly earlier.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“TIBA sprayed plants flowered significantly earlier”
e1“seed propagated geranium, cv. ‘Carefree Scarlet’”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethrel sprays significantly delayed flowering.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Ethrel sprays significantly delayed it”
t0“Flowering of Seed Propagated Geraniums”
Claim · model-written summary
TIBA sprays reduced geranium height at flowering.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both TIBA and Ethrel sprays reduced geranium height at flowering and stimulated branching”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethrel sprays reduced geranium height at flowering.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both TIBA and Ethrel sprays reduced geranium height at flowering and stimulated branching”
Claim · model-written summary
TIBA sprays stimulated geranium branching.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both TIBA and Ethrel sprays reduced geranium height at flowering and stimulated branching”
Claim · model-written summary
Ethrel sprays stimulated geranium branching.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both TIBA and Ethrel sprays reduced geranium height at flowering and stimulated branching”
Claim · model-written summary
A Cycocel soil drench caused earlier flowering.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A Cycocel soil drench caused earlier flowering, but sprays had no effect on flowering”
t0“Geraniums”
Claim · model-written summary
Cycocel sprays had no effect on flowering.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“A Cycocel soil drench caused earlier flowering, but sprays had no effect on flowering”
t0“Geraniums”
Claim · model-written summary
Flowering was earliest at 70 F night temperature.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“earliest flowering was at 70 F with 5 and 15 days delays at 60 F and 50 F”
t0“Geraniums”
Claim · model-written summary
Flowering at 60 F was delayed five days versus 70 F.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“earliest flowering was at 70 F with 5 and 15 days delays at 60 F and 50 F”
t0“Geraniums”
Claim · model-written summary
Flowering at 50 F was delayed 15 days versus 70 F.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“earliest flowering was at 70 F with 5 and 15 days delays at 60 F and 50 F”
t0“Geraniums”
Claim · model-written summary
Terminal stem nodes at flowering were 14 at 70 F.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The number of nodes of terminal stems at flowering increased from 14 at 70 F to 16 at 60 F and 17 at 50 F night temperatures”
t0“Geraniums”
Claim · model-written summary
Terminal stem nodes at flowering were 16 at 60 F.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The number of nodes of terminal stems at flowering increased from 14 at 70 F to 16 at 60 F and 17 at 50 F night temperatures”
t0“Geraniums”
Claim · model-written summary
Terminal stem nodes at flowering were 17 at 50 F.
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The number of nodes of terminal stems at flowering increased from 14 at 70 F to 16 at 60 F and 17 at 50 F night temperatures”
t0“Geraniums”
The same questions in other papers
chlormequat chloride · phenology · GeraniumResults differ
4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
3 papers more in this group
See all 7 papers →(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · growth · GeraniumPositive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · phenology · GeraniumResults agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- negative
- negative
application · phenology · GeraniumPositive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →application · growth · GeraniumPositive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
9 papers more in this group
See all 13 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.