Abstract
This experiment was carried out to increase the shelf life and maintaining the quality of mango (Mangifera indica) fruits. There were two factors. Factor A: postharvest treatments with six levels (1. untreated (control), 2. washing with chlorine, 3. dipping (5 minutes) in calcium chloride (CaCl 2 ), 4. dipping (5 minutes) in bavistin and rinse in clean water, 5. hot water treatment and 6. tap water wash) and factor B: packaging technique with five levels (1. without packaging (control), 2. perforated poly bag (0.5%), 3. non- perforated poly bag, 4. plastic crate and 5. corrugated fibre board carton). The fruits treated with chlorine wash, tap water wash, hot water treatment, dipping in calcium chloride and bavistin were significant difference on chemical parameter (total sugar content, vitamin-C, total titrable acidity and total soluble solid) of mango. Treated fruits performed less disease incidence compared to without treated fruits. Non-treated fruits were attacked by the sunken black spots on the surface of the fruits as well as anthracnose (Colletotrichum gloeosporioides). In case of packaging technique, fruits packed in different packaging materials (like corrugated fibre board carton, plastic crate, perforate and non-perforated polyethylene bag) had the maximum shelf life, lower physiological loss in weight and less disease incidence than without package. Among the different packaging materials, fruits packed in corrugated fibre board carton had the maximum shelf life (13.02 days), lower physiological loss in weight (4.11%) and less disease incidence (1.12%) without excessive deterioration compared to others. The shelf life of mango could be extended up to 5 days by hot water treatment and packed in. corrugated fibre board carton compared to others. The color and quality of mango was very better in treated fruits compared to non-treated fruits.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Washing and dipping treatments significantly altered mango fruit chemical parameters.
- Taxon
- mango
_from_India.jpg?width=60)
Mangifera indicae0 - Treatment
- chlorine wash, tap water wash, hot water treatment, dipping in calcium chloride and bavistine0
- Outcome
- total sugar content, vitamin-C, total titrable acidity and total soluble solide0
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“The fruits treated with chlorine wash, tap water wash, hot water treatment, dipping in calcium chloride and bavistin were significant difference on chemical parameter (total sugar content, vitamin-C, total titrable acidity and total soluble solid) of mango”
Claim · model-written summary
Treated mango fruits had less disease incidence than untreated fruits.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- Treated fruitse0
- Outcome
- disease incidencee0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Comparator
- without treated fruitse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Treated fruits performed less disease incidence compared to without treated fruits”
t0“MANGO”
Claim · model-written summary
Packaging increased mango shelf life compared with no package.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- different packaging materialse0
- Outcome
- maximum shelf lifee0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Comparator
- without packagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruits packed in different packaging materials (like corrugated fibre board carton, plastic crate, perforate and non-perforated polyethylene bag) had the maximum shelf life, lower physiological loss in weight and less disease incidence than without package”
t0“MANGO”
Claim · model-written summary
Packaging reduced mango physiological weight loss relative to no package.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- different packaging materialse0
- Outcome
- physiological loss in weighte0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- without packagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruits packed in different packaging materials (like corrugated fibre board carton, plastic crate, perforate and non-perforated polyethylene bag) had the maximum shelf life, lower physiological loss in weight and less disease incidence than without package”
t0“MANGO”
Claim · model-written summary
Packaging reduced mango disease incidence relative to no package.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- different packaging materialse0
- Outcome
- disease incidencee0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Comparator
- without packagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruits packed in different packaging materials (like corrugated fibre board carton, plastic crate, perforate and non-perforated polyethylene bag) had the maximum shelf life, lower physiological loss in weight and less disease incidence than without package”
t0“MANGO”
Claim · model-written summary
Corrugated fibre board cartons yielded the longest shelf life, 13.02 days.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- corrugated fibre board cartone0
- Outcome
- shelf lifee0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 13.02 dayse0
- Comparator
- otherse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruits packed in corrugated fibre board carton had the maximum shelf life (13.02 days), lower physiological loss in weight (4.11%) and less disease incidence (1.12%) without excessive deterioration compared to others”
t0“MANGO”
Claim · model-written summary
Corrugated fibre board cartons yielded 4.11% physiological weight loss.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- corrugated fibre board cartone0
- Outcome
- physiological loss in weighte0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Value
- 4.11%e0
- Comparator
- otherse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruits packed in corrugated fibre board carton had the maximum shelf life (13.02 days), lower physiological loss in weight (4.11%) and less disease incidence (1.12%) without excessive deterioration compared to others”
t0“MANGO”
Claim · model-written summary
Corrugated fibre board cartons yielded 1.12% disease incidence.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicat0
- Treatment
- corrugated fibre board cartone0
- Outcome
- disease incidencee0
- Direction
- lesse0
- Value
- 1.12%e0
- Comparator
- otherse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“fruits packed in corrugated fibre board carton had the maximum shelf life (13.02 days), lower physiological loss in weight (4.11%) and less disease incidence (1.12%) without excessive deterioration compared to others”
t0“MANGO”
Claim · model-written summary
Hot water treatment combined with carton packaging extended mango shelf life by up to 5 days.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- hot water treatment and packed in. corrugated fibre board cartone0
- Outcome
- shelf lifee0
- Direction
- extendede0
- Value
- 5 dayse0
- Comparator
- otherse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The shelf life of mango could be extended up to 5 days by hot water treatment and packed in. corrugated fibre board carton compared to others”
Claim · model-written summary
Treated mango fruit had better color and quality than non-treated fruit.
- Taxon
- mangoMangifera indicae0
- Treatment
- treated fruitse0
- Outcome
- color and qualitye0
- Direction
- bettere0
- Comparator
- non-treated fruitse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The color and quality of mango was very better in treated fruits compared to non-treated fruits”
The same questions in other papers
heat · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ
32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
36 papers more in this group
See all 40 papers →storage · disease · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →storage · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Positive and negative results
104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
105 papers more in this group
See all 109 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.