Paper · 1997 · American Journal of Alternative Agriculture

Effect of cultural practices on barley and durum wheat yields in semiarid regions of Tunisia

A. Yahyaoui; K. M'Hedhbi; S. Rezgui

13
claims
18
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract The semiarid regions (SARs) are characterized by extreme temperature changes, low and unevenly distributed precipitation, hazardous torrential rains, and frequent early spring droughts. Barley is the most highly adapted cereal in SARs, but durum wheat is the most widely cultivated. The area in cereals varies considerably from year to year, and yields are low. Tillage practices are used to conserve both soil and moisture and to prepare the seed bed. However, improved fertilizer use and weed control practices are not being used. Without development of needed cultural and tillage practice systems, the genetic potential of today's varieties cannot be realized. Planting depth and rate, row spacing, fertilizer application, and weed control were investigated under conventional tillage and reduced tillage systems. In on-farm trials, reduced tillage did not significantly affect durum wheat yield but slightly increased barley yield compared with traditional practices. Optimum planting depth for both wheat and barley was 7 cm. Higher seeding rates increased the yield of both crops. Highest yields were obtained at planting rates of 140 kg/ha for wheat and 100 kg/ha for barley. At these rates, maximum yields were achieved at row spacings of 30 cm for barley and 20 cm for durum wheat. Use of fertilizer and weed control increased yields substantially. Sustained and increased production in SARs can be achieved with a “package of practices” approach that incorporates these cultural and tillage practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage did not significantly affect durum wheat yield versus traditional practices.

Treatment
reduced tillagee0
Outcome
durum wheat yielde0
Direction
did not significantly affecte0
Comparator
traditional practicese0
Setting
on-farm trialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In on-farm trials, reduced tillage did not significantly affect durum wheat yield but slightly increased barley yield compared with traditional practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–981 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced tillage slightly increased barley yield versus traditional practices.

Treatment
reduced tillagee0
Outcome
barley yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
traditional practicese0
Setting
on-farm trialse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In on-farm trials, reduced tillage did not significantly affect durum wheat yield but slightly increased barley yield compared with traditional practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 827–981 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum planting depth for wheat was 7 cm.

Outcome
Optimum planting depthe0
Value
7 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Optimum planting depth for both wheat and barley was 7 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1040 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Optimum planting depth for barley was 7 cm.

Outcome
Optimum planting depthe0
Value
7 cme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Optimum planting depth for both wheat and barley was 7 cm.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 982–1040 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher seeding rates increased wheat yield.

Treatment
Higher seeding ratese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher seeding rates increased the yield of both crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 43–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher seeding rates increased barley yield.

Treatment
Higher seeding ratese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher seeding rates increased the yield of both crops.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1041–1096 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–38 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest wheat yield occurred at a planting rate of 140 kg/ha.

Treatment
planting rates of 140 kg/hae0
Outcome
Highest yieldse0
Direction
Higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest yields were obtained at planting rates of 140 kg/ha for wheat and 100 kg/ha for barley.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1192 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest barley yield occurred at a planting rate of 100 kg/ha.

Treatment
100 kg/ha for barleye0
Outcome
Highest yieldse0
Direction
Higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Highest yields were obtained at planting rates of 140 kg/ha for wheat and 100 kg/ha for barley.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1192 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At these planting rates, maximum barley yield occurred at 30 cm row spacing.

Treatment
row spacings of 30 cme0
Outcome
maximum yieldse0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At these rates, maximum yields were achieved at row spacings of 30 cm for barley and 20 cm for durum wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1300 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At these planting rates, maximum durum wheat yield occurred at 20 cm row spacing.

Treatment
20 cm for durum wheate0
Outcome
maximum yieldse0
Direction
maximume0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“At these rates, maximum yields were achieved at row spacings of 30 cm for barley and 20 cm for durum wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1193–1300 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fertilizer use substantially increased cereal yields.

Treatment
fertilizere0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Use of fertilizer and weed control increased yields substantially.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1367 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley and durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–54 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed control substantially increased cereal yields.

Treatment
weed controle0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Use of fertilizer and weed control increased yields substantially.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1301–1367 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley and durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–54 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend a package of cultural and tillage practices for sustained and increased cereal production in semiarid regions.

Outcome
“package of practices” approache0
Setting
SARse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum
Triticum turgidum subsp. durum · TaxonSten Porse · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sustained and increased production in SARs can be achieved with a “package of practices” approach that incorporates these cultural and tillage practices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1368–1521 · show in text ↑
t0

“barley and durum wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 32–54 · show in text ↑

herbicide · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

61 papers: 42 positive, 19 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Results differ

79 papers: 68 positive, 11 negative or no effect

67 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 12 positive, 8 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

density · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 19 positive, 4 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum turgidum (rivet wheat)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 31 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

density · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 73 positive, 24 negative or no effect

72 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

tillage · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

161 papers: 105 positive, 56 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 43 in the opposite direction · 13 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

157 papers more in this group

See all 161 papers →

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

472 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 11 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

546 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.