Paper · 1978 · Soil Science

IRRIGATION TIMING—ITS INFLUENCE ON THE EFFECTS OF SALINITY AND WATERLOGGING STRESSES IN TOBACCO PLANTS

D. W. WEST; J. D. F. BLACK

10
claims
23
verbatim quotes
13
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Salinity (NaCl) and soil-oxygen-deficiency stresses were applied to tobacco plants, and water uptake by the plants was measured for 10 days. After 10 days Na+ and Cl- concentrations were measured in different plant parts. The plants were irrigated at 8 A.M. or 8 P.M. with or without salinity stress (90 me/l), and were allowed to drain or remain undrained (soil oxygen deficiency). Water uptake was significantly reduced (P = 0.05) by the presence of NaCl in the root zone irrespective of irrigation and drainage treatment. Leaf chloride in all nonsalinized treatments was significantly lower (P = 0.01) than in all salinized treatments. Both day and night waterlogged saline treatment were significantly higher (P = 0.01 and P = 0.05, respectively) than the nonwaterlogged salinized treatment. Thus there was a strong and adverse effect of waterlogging on the uptake of NaCl. The saline treatment that was waterlogged at night was significantly lower (P = 0.05) than the day waterlogged saline treatment. This difference in Cl- concentration between day and night waterlogging treatments was significant only for leaf chloride, although the same trend to higher Cl- content with day waterlogging was present with petioles and stems. Root Cl- concentrations were relatively low irrespective of treatment. Leaf sodium concentrations of day and night waterlogged salinity treatments were significantly higher (P = 0.01) than all other treatments, and the day waterlogged salinized plants were significantly higher (P = 0.05) in leaf Na+ than the night waterlogged salinity treatment. With respect to irrigation management, it is suggested that plants in a soil with some chance of being waterlogged even partially in the root zone and with NaCl present in the root zone would benefit from being irrigated at night rather than during the day.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Root-zone NaCl reduced tobacco water uptake irrespective of irrigation and drainage.

Taxon
tobacco plantsNicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
NaCl in the root zonee0
Outcome
Water uptakee0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
irrespective of irrigation and drainage treatmente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water uptake was significantly reduced (P = 0.05) by the presence of NaCl in the root zone irrespective of irrigation and drainage treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 383–523 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOBACCO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nonsalinized tobacco had less leaf chloride than salinized tobacco.

Taxon
tobacco plantsNicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
nonsalinized treatmentse0
Outcome
Leaf chloridee0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
salinized treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf chloride in all nonsalinized treatments was significantly lower (P = 0.01) than in all salinized treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–637 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOBACCO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Daytime waterlogged saline treatment increased leaf chloride over nonwaterlogged saline treatment.

Taxon
tobacco plantsNicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
day and night waterlogged saline treatmente0
Outcome
Leaf chloridee1
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
daye0
Comparator
nonwaterlogged salinized treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both day and night waterlogged saline treatment were significantly higher (P = 0.01 and P = 0.05, respectively) than the nonwaterlogged salinized treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOBACCO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaf chloride in all nonsalinized treatments was significantly lower (P = 0.01) than in all salinized treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–637 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nighttime waterlogged saline treatment increased leaf chloride over nonwaterlogged saline treatment.

Taxon
tobacco plantsNicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
night waterlogged saline treatmente0
Outcome
Leaf chloridee1
Direction
highere0
Comparator
nonwaterlogged salinized treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both day and night waterlogged saline treatment were significantly higher (P = 0.01 and P = 0.05, respectively) than the nonwaterlogged salinized treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 639–794 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOBACCO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaf chloride in all nonsalinized treatments was significantly lower (P = 0.01) than in all salinized treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–637 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Night waterlogging produced less leaf chloride than day waterlogging under salinity.

Taxon
tobacco plantsNicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
waterlogged at nighte0
Outcome
leaf chloridee1
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
day waterlogged saline treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The saline treatment that was waterlogged at night was significantly lower (P = 0.05) than the day waterlogged saline treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 878–1005 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOBACCO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Leaf chloride in all nonsalinized treatments was significantly lower (P = 0.01) than in all salinized treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 525–637 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Petioles and stems showed a trend toward higher chloride under day rather than night waterlogging.

Taxon
tobacco plantsNicotiana tabacumt0
Organ / stage
petioles and stemse0
Treatment
day waterlogginge0
Outcome
Cl- contente0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the same trend to higher Cl- content with day waterlogging was present with petioles and stems”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1139–1233 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOBACCO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–102 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root chloride concentrations were relatively low regardless of treatment.

Taxon
tobacco plantsNicotiana tabacumt0
Outcome
Root Cl- concentrationse0
Direction
relatively lowe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Root Cl- concentrations were relatively low irrespective of treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1235–1304 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOBACCO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Day and night waterlogged salinity treatments increased leaf sodium against other treatments.

Taxon
tobacco plantsNicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
day and night waterlogged salinity treatmentse0
Outcome
Leaf sodium concentrationse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
all other treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Leaf sodium concentrations of day and night waterlogged salinity treatments were significantly higher (P = 0.01) than all other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1444 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOBACCO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Day waterlogging under salinity increased leaf sodium relative to night waterlogging.

Taxon
tobacco plantsNicotiana tabacumt0
Treatment
day waterlogged salinized plantse0
Outcome
leaf Na+e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
night waterlogged salinity treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the day waterlogged salinized plants were significantly higher (P = 0.05) in leaf Na+ than the night waterlogged salinity treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1450–1581 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOBACCO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–102 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Night irrigation is suggested for tobacco in soil at risk of partial waterlogging with NaCl in the root zone.

Taxon
tobacco plantsNicotiana tabacumt0
Outcome
being irrigated at night rather than during the daye0
Qualifier
some chance of being waterlogged even partially in the root zone and with NaCl present in the root zonee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Nicotiana tabacum
Nicotiana tabacum · TaxonJom / Joachim Müllerchen · CC BY 2.5 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“plants in a soil with some chance of being waterlogged even partially in the root zone and with NaCl present in the root zone would benefit from being irrigated at night rather than during the day”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1643–1839 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOBACCO PLANTS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–102 · show in text ↑

salinity · nutrient: content · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

flooding · molecular: metabolites · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 2 positive, 6 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

salinity · molecular: metabolites · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 4 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

flooding · nutrient: content · Nicotiana tabacum (tobacco)Results agree

3 papers: 0 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.