Paper · 1973 · New Zealand Journal of Crop and Horticultural Science

Calcium sprays for control of bitter pit and other disorders in apples

E. T. Chittenden; D. J. Stanton; J. Watson

14
claims
21
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Abstract Calcium nitrate sprays were applied to ‘Cox's Orange’ apples over four different periods between fruit set and harvest. Four sprays applied early, from 8 October to 2 December, gave no control of bitter pit. With the other three periods (II days, 27 days, and 64 days pre‐harvest) there was good control of pit. The relative values of these three later spraying periods for pit control were difficult to assess, but the 64‐day period gave slightly less pit in one season. The highest levels of fruit calcium were with the 27‐day pre‐harvest period. Over 64 days pre‐harvest, 6 sprays of 0.6% calcium nitrate doubled the total calcium in apples, whereas in unsprayed apples total calcium remained practically constant. Over this period the apples gained in weight fourfold, thereby reducing the percentage of calcium in sprayed apples to one‐half, and in unsprayed apples to near one‐quarter. Calcium sprays reduced internal breakdown in ‘Cox's Orange’ and ‘Red Delicious’ apples. Colour development on ‘Red Delicious’ apples was retarded by calcium nitrate, but not by calcium chloride sprays. Apples which were protected from spray gained no benefit from four calcium nitrate sprays applied to the rest of the tree.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Four early calcium nitrate sprays gave no bitter pit control.

Treatment
Four sprays applied earlye0
Outcome
bitter pite0
Direction
no controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four sprays applied early, from 8 October to 2 December, gave no control of bitter pit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 129–216 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium nitrate sprays at 11, 27 and 64 days before harvest controlled bitter pit.

Treatment
three periods (II days, 27 days, and 64 days pre‐harvest)e0
Outcome
pite0
Direction
good controle0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With the other three periods (II days, 27 days, and 64 days pre‐harvest) there was good control of pit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 217–320 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 64-day preharvest period gave slightly less bitter pit in one season.

Treatment
64‐day periode0
Outcome
pite0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the 64‐day period gave slightly less pit in one season”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 425–479 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit calcium was highest with the 27-day preharvest spray period.

Treatment
27‐day pre‐harvest periode0
Outcome
levels of fruit calciume0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest levels of fruit calcium were with the 27‐day pre‐harvest period.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 481–557 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Six 0.6% calcium nitrate sprays doubled total apple calcium over 64 days before harvest.

Treatment
6 sprays of 0.6% calcium nitratee0
Outcome
total calciume0
Direction
doublede0
Comparator
unsprayed applese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over 64 days pre‐harvest, 6 sprays of 0.6% calcium nitrate doubled the total calcium in apples, whereas in unsprayed apples total calcium remained practically constant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–726 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Unsprayed apple total calcium remained practically constant.

Outcome
total calciume0
Direction
remained practically constante0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in unsprayed apples total calcium remained practically constant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 662–725 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apple weight increased fourfold during the 64-day period.

Outcome
weighte0
Direction
gainede0
Value
fourfolde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Over this period the apples gained in weight fourfold”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 727–780 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium percentage in sprayed apples fell to one-half.

Outcome
percentage of calciume0
Direction
reducinge0
Value
one‐halfe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reducing the percentage of calcium in sprayed apples to one‐half”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–854 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium percentage in unsprayed apples fell to near one-quarter.

Outcome
percentage of calciumt1
Direction
reducinge2
Value
near one‐quartere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and in unsprayed apples to near one‐quarter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–899 · show in text ↑
t0

“apples”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–70 · show in text ↑
t1

“percentage of calcium”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 803–824 · show in text ↑
e2

“reducing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–798 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium sprays reduced internal breakdown in Cox’s Orange apples.

Material
Cox's Orangee0
Treatment
Calcium sprayse0
Outcome
internal breakdowne0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Calcium sprays reduced internal breakdown in ‘Cox's Orange’ and ‘Red Delicious’ apples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–988 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium sprays reduced internal breakdown in Red Delicious apples.

Material
Red Deliciouse0
Treatment
Calcium sprayse0
Outcome
internal breakdowne0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Calcium sprays reduced internal breakdown in ‘Cox's Orange’ and ‘Red Delicious’ apples.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 901–988 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium nitrate retarded Red Delicious color development.

Material
Red Deliciouse0
Treatment
calcium nitratee0
Outcome
Colour developmente0
Direction
retardede0
Comparator
calcium chloride sprayse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Colour development on ‘Red Delicious’ apples was retarded by calcium nitrate, but not by calcium chloride sprays.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium chloride sprays did not retard Red Delicious color development.

Material
Red Deliciouse0
Treatment
calcium chloride sprayse0
Outcome
Colour developmente0
Direction
note0
Comparator
calcium nitratee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Colour development on ‘Red Delicious’ apples was retarded by calcium nitrate, but not by calcium chloride sprays.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Spray-protected apples gained no benefit from four calcium nitrate sprays applied to the rest of the tree.

Treatment
four calcium nitrate sprayse0
Outcome
benefite0
Direction
no benefite0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Apples which were protected from spray gained no benefit from four calcium nitrate sprays applied to the rest of the tree.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1103–1225 · show in text ↑

calcium nitrate · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

calcium chloride dihydrate · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Results differ

47 papers: 41 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
    Calcium chloride sprays gave better apple colour development than calcium nitrate sprays.

    Bitter pit in Cox's Orange apples · 1969 · compared with nitrate

    No difference from an alternativeCited by this paper

  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

calcium nitrate · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

application · quality: postharvest · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 58 positive, 16 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 58 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

70 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

116 papers: 100 positive, 16 negative or no effect

99 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

112 papers more in this group

See all 116 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.