Paper · 2005 · HAYATI Journal of Biosciences

Photosynthesis of C3 and C4 Species in Response to Increased CO 2 Concentration and Drought Stress

HAMIM

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
45
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Photosynthetic gas exchange in response to increased carbon dioxide concentration ([CO2]) and drought stress of two C3 (wheat and kale) and two C4 species (Echinochloa crusgallii and Amaranthus caudatus) were analysed. Plants were grown in controlled growth chambers with ambient (350 μmol mol−1) and doubled ambient [CO2]. Drought was given by withholding water until the plants severely wilted, whereas the control plants were watered daily. Even though stomatal conductance (Gs) of C4 species either under ambient or double [CO2] was lower than those in C3, doubled [CO2] decreased Gs of all species under well watered conditions. As a result, the plants grown under doubled [CO2] transpired less water than those grown under ambient [CO2]. Photosynthesis (Pn) of the C4 species was sustained during moderate drought when those of the C3 species decreased significantly. Doubled [CO2] increased photosynthesis of C3 but not of C4 species. Increased [CO2] was only able to delay Pn reduction of all species due to the drought, but not remove it completely. The positive effects of increased [CO2] during moderate drought and the disappearance of it under severe drought suggesting that metabolic effect may limit photosynthesis under severe drought.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Stomatal conductance of C4 species was lower than that of C3 species under both ambient and doubled CO2.

Taxon
C4 speciese3
Outcome
stomatal conductance (Gs)e3
Direction
lowere3
Comparator
C3e3

Verbatim

e3

“Even though stomatal conductance (Gs) of C4 species either under ambient or double [CO2] was lower than those in C3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 444–559 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Doubled CO2 decreased stomatal conductance of all species under well-watered conditions.

Taxon
two C3 (wheat and kale) and two C4 speciese0
Treatment
doubled [CO2]e4
Outcome
Gse4
Direction
decreasede4
Comparator
ambient (350 μmol mol−1)e2

Verbatim

e0

“two C3 (wheat and kale) and two C4 species (Echinochloa crusgallii and Amaranthus caudatus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–203 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plants were grown in controlled growth chambers with ambient (350 μmol mol−1) and doubled ambient [CO2]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–322 · show in text ↑
e4

“doubled [CO2] decreased Gs of all species under well watered conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 561–632 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Doubled CO2 increased photosynthesis of wheat and kale (C3 species).

Treatment
Doubled [CO2]e5
Outcome
photosynthesise5
Direction
increasede5
Comparator
ambient (350 μmol mol−1)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. viridis
Brassica oleracea var. viridis · TaxonAnn Perry · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“two C3 (wheat and kale) and two C4 species (Echinochloa crusgallii and Amaranthus caudatus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–203 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plants were grown in controlled growth chambers with ambient (350 μmol mol−1) and doubled ambient [CO2]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–322 · show in text ↑
e5

“Doubled [CO2] increased photosynthesis of C3 but not of C4 species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Doubled CO2 did not change photosynthesis of Echinochloa crusgallii and Amaranthus caudatus (C4 species).

Taxon
Echinochloa crusgallii and Amaranthus caudatuse0
Treatment
Doubled [CO2]e5
Outcome
photosynthesise5
Direction
no_changeinferrede5
Comparator
ambient (350 μmol mol−1)e2

Verbatim

e0

“two C3 (wheat and kale) and two C4 species (Echinochloa crusgallii and Amaranthus caudatus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–203 · show in text ↑
e2

“Plants were grown in controlled growth chambers with ambient (350 μmol mol−1) and doubled ambient [CO2]”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 219–322 · show in text ↑
e5

“Doubled [CO2] increased photosynthesis of C3 but not of C4 species”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 874–940 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthesis (Pn) of C4 species was sustained during moderate drought.

Taxon
C4 speciese6
Treatment
moderate droughte6
Outcome
Photosynthesis (Pn)e6
Direction
sustainede6
Comparator
C3 speciese6

Verbatim

e6

“Photosynthesis (Pn) of the C4 species was sustained during moderate drought when those of the C3 species decreased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Photosynthesis (Pn) of C3 species decreased significantly during moderate drought.

Taxon
C3 speciese6
Treatment
moderate droughte6
Outcome
Photosynthesis (Pn)e6
Direction
decreasede6
Comparator
C4 speciese6

Verbatim

e6

“Photosynthesis (Pn) of the C4 species was sustained during moderate drought when those of the C3 species decreased significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased CO2 only delayed the reduction of photosynthesis under drought in all species and did not remove it completely.

Taxon
two C3 (wheat and kale) and two C4 speciese0
Treatment
Increased [CO2]e7
Outcome
Pn reductione7
Direction
delaye7

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“two C3 (wheat and kale) and two C4 species (Echinochloa crusgallii and Amaranthus caudatus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–203 · show in text ↑
e7

“Increased [CO2] was only able to delay Pn reduction of all species due to the drought, but not remove it completely”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1057 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The benefit of increased CO2 disappears under severe drought, suggesting that a metabolic effect may limit photosynthesis under severe drought.

Taxon
two C3 (wheat and kale) and two C4 speciese0
Outcome
photosynthesise1
Qualifier
metabolic effecte1

Verbatim

e0

“two C3 (wheat and kale) and two C4 species (Echinochloa crusgallii and Amaranthus caudatus)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 112–203 · show in text ↑
e1

“suggesting that metabolic effect may limit photosynthesis under severe drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1250 · show in text ↑
e2

“The positive effects of increased [CO2] during moderate drought and the disappearance of it under severe drought”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1171 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 7 positive, 2 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 69 positive, 28 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.