Paper · 1988 · The Journal of Agricultural Science

Variation between years in growth and nutrient uptake after anthesis of winter wheat on Broadbalk field at Rothamsted, 1969–84

G. N. Thorne; R. J. Darby; W. Day; et al.

20
claims
42
verbatim quotes
12
citations
5
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Summary Dry weight, nutrient content and other properties of winter wheat were measured from anthesis to maturity between 1969 and 1984. From 1969 to 1978 the cultivar Capelle- Desprez was grown either as a first wheat, in the rotation potatoes, beans, wheat, or as a second wheat, in the rotation fallow, wheat, wheat. From 1979 to 1984 the cv. Flanders was grown in the rotation fallow, potatoes, wheat and in this period the wheat was given fungicide sprays. Grain yield of Cappelle-Desprez grown as a first wheat was greater with 96 than with 144 kg N/ha in spring. First wheats yielded much more than second wheats with 96, but not with 144 kg N/ha. Second wheats had more eyespot and take-all, but less mildew, than first wheats. Mildew was more severe with the larger amount of N. Grain yield of Flanders as a first wheat was greater than that of Cappelle-Desprez. Yield of Flanders was greater with 144 than with 96 kg N/ha and it was greater still on plots given 96 kg Nha plus 35 t/ha farmyard manure. Other properties in addition to grain yield were changed by cultivar, rotation and manuring. Examination of the variation between years showed relationships among properties and between some of them and grain yield. Many of the relationships were independent of cultivar or husbandry. Relationships between weather factors and some properties, but not grain yield, were detected. Grain yield of first wheats was closely related to number of grains/m 2 , but the relative importance of number of ears/m 2 and number of grains per ear varied from year to year. Yield was positively related to dry weight per grain in Flanders, but negatively in Cappelle-Desprez. The weight of straw was usually less than that of the total above-ground crop at anthesis, but varied between years in a similar manner. The amount of N in grain plus straw was generally well related to the amount of N in the wheat at anthesis, although the changes in N content after anthesis ranged from a loss of 9 kg/ha to a gain of 51 kg/ha. The uptake of N, P and K was more closely related to dry weight than to nutrient concentration. Variation between years in the proportion in the ear of 14 C supplied to the flag leaf was similar to that of 14 C supplied to the next lower leaf, but was different for 14 C supplied before and after anthesis, and did not relate to other properties. Date of anthesis ranged from 7 June to 5 July. A model incorporating responses to photoperiod, vernalization and temperature accounted for 78% of the variance in date of anthesis. The duration of the period from anthesis to leaf senescence ranged from 33 to 60 days and was linearly related to mean temperature above a base of 7·5 °C. Dry weight per grain was negatively correlated with mean temperature between anthesis and leaf senescence; a relationship including an adjustment for number of grains/m 2 fitted both cultivars. The amount of N in grain plus straw and percentage of N in grain dry matter were decreased by increased rainfall during the 3-week period following the application of N fertilizer in spring. An additional 10 mm of rain decreased N uptake by 2–8 kg/ha and N percentage by 0·055. N uptake in grain plus straw decreased with progressively later sowing. Grain N% was positively correlated with temperature and with radiation during parts of the period of grain growth, but only 10% of the variance was accounted for by the combined effects.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield of Cappelle-Desprez as a first wheat was greater with 96 than with 144 kg N/ha in spring.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Cappelle-Despreze1
Treatment
96e1
Outcome
Grain yielde1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
144 kg N/hae1
Setting
Broadbalk fieldt0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat on Broadbalk field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain yield of Cappelle-Desprez grown as a first wheat was greater with 96 than with 144 kg N/ha in spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–568 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

First wheats yielded much more than second wheats at 96 kg N/ha.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
First wheatse1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
much moree1
Qualifier
but not with 144 kg N/hae1
Comparator
second wheatse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat on Broadbalk field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“First wheats yielded much more than second wheats with 96, but not with 144 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 570–653 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second wheats had more eyespot and take-all than first wheats.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Second wheatse1
Interactor
eyespote1pathogen
Second interactor
take-alle1pathogen
Outcome
eyespot and take-alle1
Direction
moree1
Comparator
first wheatse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat on Broadbalk field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Second wheats had more eyespot and take-all, but less mildew, than first wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–734 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Second wheats had less mildew than first wheats.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Second wheatse1
Interactor
mildewe1pathogen
Outcome
mildewe1
Direction
lesse1
Comparator
first wheatse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat on Broadbalk field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Second wheats had more eyespot and take-all, but less mildew, than first wheats”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–734 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mildew was more severe with the larger amount of nitrogen.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
the larger amount of Ne1
Interactor
Mildewe1pathogen
Outcome
Mildewe1
Direction
more severee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat on Broadbalk field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Mildew was more severe with the larger amount of N”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–786 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield of Flanders as a first wheat was greater than that of Cappelle-Desprez.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Flanderse1
Treatment
first wheate1
Outcome
Grain yielde1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
Cappelle-Despreze1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat on Broadbalk field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain yield of Flanders as a first wheat was greater than that of Cappelle-Desprez”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 788–870 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield of Flanders was greater with 144 than with 96 kg N/ha.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Flanderse1
Treatment
144e1
Outcome
Yielde1
Direction
greatere1
Comparator
96 kg N/hae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat on Broadbalk field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield of Flanders was greater with 144 than with 96 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–931 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flanders yield was greater still with 96 kg N/ha plus 35 t/ha farmyard manure.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Flanderse1
Treatment
96 kg Nha plus 35 t/ha farmyard manuree2
Outcome
Yielde1
Direction
greater stille2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat on Broadbalk field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield of Flanders was greater with 144 than with 96 kg N/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 872–931 · show in text ↑
e2

“it was greater still on plots given 96 kg Nha plus 35 t/ha farmyard manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 936–1010 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield of first wheats was closely related to the number of grains per square metre.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
first wheatse1
Outcome
Grain yielde1
Qualifier
closely relatede1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat on Broadbalk field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Grain yield of first wheats was closely related to number of grains/m 2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1392–1463 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was positively related to dry weight per grain in Flanders.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Flanderse1
Outcome
Yielde1
Direction
positivelye1
Qualifier
dry weight per graine1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat on Broadbalk field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield was positively related to dry weight per grain in Flanders, but negatively in Cappelle-Desprez”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1671 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Yield was negatively related to dry weight per grain in Cappelle-Desprez.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
Cappelle-Despreze1
Outcome
Yielde1
Direction
negativelye1
Qualifier
dry weight per graine1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat on Broadbalk field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Yield was positively related to dry weight per grain in Flanders, but negatively in Cappelle-Desprez”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1571–1671 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The amount of N in grain plus straw was generally well related to the amount of N in the wheat at anthesis.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
amount of N in grain plus strawe1
Qualifier
generally well relatede1
Comparator
amount of N in the wheat at anthesise1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat on Broadbalk field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“The amount of N in grain plus straw was generally well related to the amount of N in the wheat at anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1810–1916 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The change in N content after anthesis ranged from a loss of 9 kg/ha to a gain of 51 kg/ha.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
changes in N content after anthesise1
Value
a loss of 9 kg/ha to a gain of 51 kg/hae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat on Broadbalk field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“the changes in N content after anthesis ranged from a loss of 9 kg/ha to a gain of 51 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1927–2018 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Date of anthesis ranged from 7 June to 5 July.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Date of anthesise1
Value
7 June to 5 Julye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat on Broadbalk field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Date of anthesis ranged from 7 June to 5 July”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2367–2412 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A model with photoperiod, vernalization and temperature responses accounted for 78% of the variance in date of anthesis.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
variance in date of anthesise1
Value
78%e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat on Broadbalk field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“A model incorporating responses to photoperiod, vernalization and temperature accounted for 78% of the variance in date of anthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2414–2545 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The period from anthesis to leaf senescence lasted 33 to 60 days and was linearly related to mean temperature above 7·5 °C.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
mean temperature above a base of 7·5 °Ce1
Outcome
duration of the period from anthesis to leaf senescencee1
Value
33 to 60 dayse1

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat on Broadbalk field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“The duration of the period from anthesis to leaf senescence ranged from 33 to 60 days and was linearly related to mean temperature above a base of 7·5 °C”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2547–2700 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry weight per grain was negatively correlated with mean temperature between anthesis and leaf senescence.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
mean temperature between anthesis and leaf senescencee1
Outcome
Dry weight per graine1
Direction
negatively correlatede1
Qualifier
a relationship including an adjustment for number of grains/m 2 fitted both cultivarse2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat on Broadbalk field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“Dry weight per grain was negatively correlated with mean temperature between anthesis and leaf senescence”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2702–2807 · show in text ↑
e2

“a relationship including an adjustment for number of grains/m 2 fitted both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2809–2894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased rainfall in the 3-week period after spring N application decreased N in grain plus straw and N percentage in grain.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
increased rainfall during the 3-week period following the application of N fertilizer in springe1
Outcome
amount of N in grain plus straw and percentage of N in grain dry mattere1
Direction
decreasede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat on Broadbalk field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“The amount of N in grain plus straw and percentage of N in grain dry matter were decreased by increased rainfall during the 3-week period following the application of N fertilizer in spring”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2896–3085 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An additional 10 mm of rain decreased N uptake by 2–8 kg/ha.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
An additional 10 mm of raine1
Outcome
N uptakee1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
2–8 kg/hae1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat on Broadbalk field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“An additional 10 mm of rain decreased N uptake by 2–8 kg/ha and N percentage by 0·055”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3087–3172 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An additional 10 mm of rain decreased N percentage in grain by 0·055.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
An additional 10 mm of raine1
Outcome
N percentagee1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
0·055e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“winter wheat on Broadbalk field”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 72–103 · show in text ↑
e1

“An additional 10 mm of rain decreased N uptake by 2–8 kg/ha and N percentage by 0·055”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 3087–3172 · show in text ↑

Triticum · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Triticum · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
See all 4 papers →

rainfall · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

rainfall · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 8 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

nitrogen · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

551 papers: 426 positive, 125 negative or no effect

124 papers in the same direction as this paper · 426 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

547 papers more in this group

See all 551 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 663 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.