Abstract
In order to increase N use efficiency of transplanted rice in vertisol, a field experiment with medium duration rice. variety “Mahamaya” was conducted with Soil: FYM conditioned and neem based products coated urea during kharif 1997. The application of Soil: FYM: Urea (1:3:1) 2/3 as basal and remaining 1/3 at panicle initiation stage of rice produced the maximum grain yield (47.78 q/ha) and N use efficiency (30.21 kg grain/kg N), which was significantly superior than prilled urea (PU), best split and PU coated with neem based products (Nimin, Nimico, Neem sona) and applied whole amount as basal. Urea coated with neem based products and applied 2/3 as basal and remaining 1/3 at PI stage found to be equally effective as Soil: FYM: Urea (1:3:1) for grain yield of rice. Urea coated with neem based products and applied either 2/3 as basal and remaining 1/3 at PI stage or whole amount as basal, although produced similar grain yield, but N use efficiency was higher when it was applied 2/3 as basal and 1/3 at PI stage.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 5
Claim · model-written summary
Soil:FYM:Urea split application gave maximum rice grain yield of 47.78 q/ha.
- Taxon
- rice
Oryza sativae0 - Treatment
- Soil: FYM: Urea (1:3:1) 2/3 as basal and remaining 1/3 at panicle initiation stagee0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 47.78 q/hae0
- Comparator
- prilled urea (PU)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of Soil: FYM: Urea (1:3:1) 2/3 as basal and remaining 1/3 at panicle initiation stage of rice produced the maximum grain yield (47.78 q/ha) and N use efficiency (30.21 kg grain/kg N), which was significantly superior than prilled urea (PU), best split and PU coated with neem based products (Nimin, Nimico, Neem sona) and applied whole amount as basal.”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment gave maximum N-use efficiency of 30.21 kg grain/kg N.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- Soil: FYM: Urea (1:3:1) 2/3 as basal and remaining 1/3 at panicle initiation stagee0
- Outcome
- N use efficiencye0
- Direction
- maximume0
- Value
- 30.21 kg grain/kg Ne0
- Comparator
- prilled urea (PU)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The application of Soil: FYM: Urea (1:3:1) 2/3 as basal and remaining 1/3 at panicle initiation stage of rice produced the maximum grain yield (47.78 q/ha) and N use efficiency (30.21 kg grain/kg N), which was significantly superior than prilled urea (PU), best split and PU coated with neem based products (Nimin, Nimico, Neem sona) and applied whole amount as basal.”
Claim · model-written summary
Split neem-coated urea was equally effective as Soil:FYM:Urea for rice grain yield.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- Urea coated with neem based products and applied 2/3 as basal and remaining 1/3 at PI stagee0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- equally effectivee0
- Comparator
- Soil: FYM: Urea (1:3:1)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Urea coated with neem based products and applied 2/3 as basal and remaining 1/3 at PI stage found to be equally effective as Soil: FYM: Urea (1:3:1) for grain yield of rice.”
Claim · model-written summary
Split and wholly basal neem-coated urea produced similar rice grain yield.
- Taxon
- riceOryza sativae0
- Treatment
- 2/3 as basal and remaining 1/3 at PI stagee0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- similare0
- Comparator
- whole amount as basale0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Urea coated with neem based products and applied 2/3 as basal and remaining 1/3 at PI stage found to be equally effective as Soil: FYM: Urea (1:3:1) for grain yield of rice. Urea coated with neem based products and applied either 2/3 as basal and remaining 1/3 at PI stage or whole amount as basal, although produced similar grain yield”
Claim · model-written summary
Split neem-coated urea gave higher N-use efficiency than wholly basal application.
Not reportedTaxonComparator
Verbatim
e0“N use efficiency was higher when it was applied 2/3 as basal and 1/3 at PI stage.”
The same questions in other papers
botanical · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 reporting no difference from an alternative
- positive
- positive
- positive
204 papers more in this group
See all 208 papers →fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
216 papers more in this group
See all 220 papers →nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
216 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
258 papers more in this group
See all 262 papers →nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
2,041 papers more in this group
See all 2,045 papers →fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results
3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
3,451 papers more in this group
See all 3,455 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.