Paper · 2013 · The Journal of Horticultural Science and Biotechnology

Response of hydroponically-grown strawberry (Fragaria×ananassaDuch.) plants to different ratios of K:Ca:Mg in the nutrient solution

Damianos Neocleous; Dimitrios Savvas

11
claims
25
verbatim quotes
16
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

SummaryExcessive Ca2+ ion concentrations in hydroponic nutrient solutions (NS) are inevitable if the Ca2+ ion concentration of the irrigation water exceeds standard recommendations. The aim of the present study was to compare three different strategies to adjust the K+ and Mg2+ ion supply and the K+: Ca2+: Mg2+ ratio in the NS supplied to hydroponically-grown strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch. cv. Camarosa) plants when the Ca2+ ion concentration in the irrigation water exceeded recommended levels.The standard NS (SNS) for strawberry that was used as a control treatment had an electrical conductivity (EC) of 1.8 dS m–1 and contained 6 mM K+, 3 mM Ca2+, and 1.4 mM Mg2+ ions. SNS was compared with three NS, all with an excessively high Ca2+ ion level (5 mM), while their K+ and Mg2+ ion levels were: (i) either not altered ("High Ca"); (ii) increased to maintain the same K+:Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio as in SNS ("High all"); (iii) or decreased to maintain the same EC as SNS ("Compensation"). The EC values of these three NS with 5 mM Ca2+ were 2.2, 2.8, and 1.8 dS m–1, respectively. The lowest plant fresh weight and fruit yield values were recorded in the "High all" treatment (78% and 57% of the values in SNS, respectively), while the two other NS with 5 mM Ca2+ did not influence plant growth or yield compared to SNS. These results indicate that for optimum crop performance the EC of the NS was more important than the K+:Ca2+:Mg2+ ratio. The reduced plant growth observed in the "High all" treatment was associated with a large increase in the EC of the drainage solution from 2.8 to 5.0 dS m–1, and significant reductions (P ≤ 0.05) in stomatal conductance, net photosynthetic rate, and transpiration rate (44%, 39%, and 43% of the values in SNS, respectively), while the intercellular CO2 concentrations in leaves were similar in all treatments. Furthermore, strawberry plants supplied with the "High all" NS exhibited synchronised reductions in leaf water and leaf osmotic potentials compared to those treated with SNS, without any alteration in leaf turgor pressure and relative water content.These results indicate that the reduced fruit yield in the "High all" treatment was associated with impaired photosynthesis, due not only to reduced stomatal conductance, but also, at the chloroplast level, caused by water stress when the EC of the NS was raised to harmful levels.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High all nutrient solution reduced strawberry fresh weight to 78% of standard nutrient solution.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
"High all"e0
Outcome
plant fresh weighte0
Direction
loweste0
Value
78%e0
Comparator
SNSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest plant fresh weight and fruit yield values were recorded in the "High all" treatment (78% and 57% of the values in SNS, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1228 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch. cv. Camarosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High all nutrient solution reduced strawberry fruit yield to 57% of standard nutrient solution.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
"High all"e0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
57%e0
Comparator
SNSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The lowest plant fresh weight and fruit yield values were recorded in the "High all" treatment (78% and 57% of the values in SNS, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1085–1228 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch. cv. Camarosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The other two high calcium solutions did not change strawberry growth or yield versus standard solution.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
two other NS with 5 mM Ca2+e0
Outcome
plant growth or yielde0
Direction
did not influencee0
Comparator
SNSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the two other NS with 5 mM Ca2+ did not influence plant growth or yield compared to SNS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1236–1323 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch. cv. Camarosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–413 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High all treatment increased drainage electrical conductivity from 2.8 to 5.0 dS m–1.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
"High all"e0
Outcome
EC of the drainage solutione0
Direction
increasee0
Value
2.8 to 5.0 dS m–1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“"High all" treatment was associated with a large increase in the EC of the drainage solution from 2.8 to 5.0 dS m–1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1488–1603 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch. cv. Camarosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High all treatment reduced stomatal conductance to 44% of standard solution.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
"High all"e2
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
44%e0
Comparator
SNSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant reductions (P ≤ 0.05) in stomatal conductance, net photosynthetic rate, and transpiration rate (44%, 39%, and 43% of the values in SNS, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1770 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch. cv. Camarosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–413 · show in text ↑
e2

“The reduced plant growth observed in the "High all" treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High all treatment reduced net photosynthetic rate to 39% of standard solution.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
"High all"e2
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
39%e0
Comparator
SNSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant reductions (P ≤ 0.05) in stomatal conductance, net photosynthetic rate, and transpiration rate (44%, 39%, and 43% of the values in SNS, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1770 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch. cv. Camarosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–413 · show in text ↑
e2

“The reduced plant growth observed in the "High all" treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1508 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

High all treatment reduced transpiration to 43% of standard solution.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
"High all"e2
Outcome
transpiration ratee0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
43%e0
Comparator
SNSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significant reductions (P ≤ 0.05) in stomatal conductance, net photosynthetic rate, and transpiration rate (44%, 39%, and 43% of the values in SNS, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1609–1770 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch. cv. Camarosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–413 · show in text ↑
e2

“The reduced plant growth observed in the "High all" treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1447–1508 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intercellular leaf CO2 concentrations were similar across treatments.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Organ / stage
leavese0
Outcome
intercellular CO2 concentrationse0
Direction
similare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the intercellular CO2 concentrations in leaves were similar in all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1778–1855 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry (Fragaria × ananassa Duch. cv. Camarosa)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–413 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High all nutrient solution reduced strawberry leaf water and osmotic potentials versus standard solution.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae0
Treatment
"High all" NSe0
Outcome
leaf water and leaf osmotic potentialse0
Direction
reductionse0
Comparator
SNSe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“strawberry plants supplied with the "High all" NS exhibited synchronised reductions in leaf water and leaf osmotic potentials compared to those treated with SNS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1870–2030 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High all nutrient solution did not alter leaf turgor pressure and relative water content.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
"High all" NSe2
Outcome
leaf turgor pressure and relative water contente0
Direction
without any alteratione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“without any alteration in leaf turgor pressure and relative water content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2032–2105 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry plants supplied with the "High all" NS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1870–1919 · show in text ↑
e2

“"High all" NS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1906–1919 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced strawberry fruit yield under High all was associated with impaired photosynthesis from stomatal limitation and chloroplast water stress.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassae1
Treatment
"High all"e0
Outcome
reduced fruit yielde0
Qualifier
impaired photosynthesise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the reduced fruit yield in the "High all" treatment was associated with impaired photosynthesis, due not only to reduced stomatal conductance, but also, at the chloroplast level, caused by water stress when the EC of the NS was raised to harmful levels”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2134–2386 · show in text ↑
e1

“strawberry plants supplied with the "High all" NS”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1870–1919 · show in text ↑

calcium(2+) · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · physiology: water · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

fertilization · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

229 papers: 193 positive, 36 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

225 papers more in this group

See all 229 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.