Paper · 2013 · Zhongguo shengtai nongye xuebao

Effects of elevated CO_2 concentration and different water conditions on winter wheat growth and water use

Yue Liu

20
claims
46
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Elevated CO2 concentration has been the main cause of climate change and has gained considerable attention due to its important impacts on crop growth and yield formation.Winter wheat,a major food crop in China,is mainly cultivated in the arid and semiarid regions of the country.It is therefore critical to study the growth and water use of winter wheat under different water and CO2 conditions.In this study,winter wheat was grown in a pot experiment in closed chambers subjected to two concentrations of CO2 [(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A) and(760.1±36.1) μmol·mol 1(E)] and two soil water contents [70% 80%(sufficient) and 50% 60%(drought) of field capacity].Plant growth,aboveground biomass,grain yield and water use efficiency(WUE) at different stages were analyzed.The results showed that although elevated CO2 had no significant effect on plant height and ear length,it respectively increased biomass by 28.6% and 18.6% under sufficient and drought water conditions.Elevated CO2 also respectively increased grain number and grain yield by 24.3% and 32.6% under sufficient water conditions and by 15.5% and 22.6% under drought conditions.Elevated CO2 showed no significant effect on the 1000-grain weight.Elevated CO2 increased evapotranspiration respectively by 8.5% and 4.6% under sufficient and drought water conditions.It also respectively increased population WUE by 17.7% and 13.7% and grain WUE by 24.8% and 17.1% under sufficient and drought water conditions.Elevated CO2 increased Pn by 15.6% and 12.9%,decreased Gs by 22.7% and 18.2% and Tr by 8.9% and 7.5% under sufficient and drought water conditions,respectively.Chlorophyll and water potential also increased under elevated CO2.There was a higher increase in water potential(7.7%) under sufficient water conditions while chlorophyll increased respectively by 7.5% and 3.8% under sufficient and drought water conditions.The results suggested that the effect of elevated CO2 on winter wheat growth,yield and WUE also depended on water conditions.The positive effects exceed the negative effects under sufficient water conditions.Grain yield improvement under elevated CO2 and was mainly driven by increased grain number.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased winter wheat biomass by 28.6% under sufficient water conditions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
elevated CO2e2
Outcome
biomasse2
Direction
increasede2
Value
28.6%e2
Qualifier
sufficiente2
Comparator
(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A)e1
Setting
closed chamberse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat was grown in a pot experiment in closed chambers subjected to two concentrations of CO2 [(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A) and(760.1±36.1) μmol·mol 1(E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–568 · show in text ↑
e2

“although elevated CO2 had no significant effect on plant height and ear length,it respectively increased biomass by 28.6% and 18.6% under sufficient and drought water conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased winter wheat biomass by 18.6% under drought water conditions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
elevated CO2e2
Outcome
biomasse2
Direction
increasede2
Value
18.6%e2
Qualifier
drought water conditionse2
Comparator
(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A)e1
Setting
closed chamberse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat was grown in a pot experiment in closed chambers subjected to two concentrations of CO2 [(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A) and(760.1±36.1) μmol·mol 1(E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–568 · show in text ↑
e2

“although elevated CO2 had no significant effect on plant height and ear length,it respectively increased biomass by 28.6% and 18.6% under sufficient and drought water conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–969 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased grain number of winter wheat by 24.3% under sufficient water conditions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
elevated CO2e2
Outcome
grain numbere2
Direction
increasede2
Value
24.3%e2
Qualifier
sufficient water conditionse2
Comparator
(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A)e1
Setting
closed chamberse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat was grown in a pot experiment in closed chambers subjected to two concentrations of CO2 [(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A) and(760.1±36.1) μmol·mol 1(E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–568 · show in text ↑
e2

“Elevated CO2 also respectively increased grain number and grain yield by 24.3% and 32.6% under sufficient water conditions and by 15.5% and 22.6% under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased winter wheat grain yield by 32.6% under sufficient water conditions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
elevated CO2e2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
32.6%e2
Qualifier
sufficient water conditionse2
Comparator
(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A)e1
Setting
closed chamberse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat was grown in a pot experiment in closed chambers subjected to two concentrations of CO2 [(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A) and(760.1±36.1) μmol·mol 1(E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–568 · show in text ↑
e2

“Elevated CO2 also respectively increased grain number and grain yield by 24.3% and 32.6% under sufficient water conditions and by 15.5% and 22.6% under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased winter wheat grain number by 15.5% under drought conditions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
elevated CO2e2
Outcome
grain numbere2
Direction
increasede2
Value
15.5%e2
Qualifier
drought conditionse2
Comparator
(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A)e1
Setting
closed chamberse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat was grown in a pot experiment in closed chambers subjected to two concentrations of CO2 [(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A) and(760.1±36.1) μmol·mol 1(E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–568 · show in text ↑
e2

“Elevated CO2 also respectively increased grain number and grain yield by 24.3% and 32.6% under sufficient water conditions and by 15.5% and 22.6% under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased winter wheat grain yield by 22.6% under drought conditions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
elevated CO2e2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
increasede2
Value
22.6%e2
Qualifier
drought conditionse2
Comparator
(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A)e1
Setting
closed chamberse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat was grown in a pot experiment in closed chambers subjected to two concentrations of CO2 [(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A) and(760.1±36.1) μmol·mol 1(E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–568 · show in text ↑
e2

“Elevated CO2 also respectively increased grain number and grain yield by 24.3% and 32.6% under sufficient water conditions and by 15.5% and 22.6% under drought conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1140 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 had no significant effect on winter wheat plant height, ear length and 1000-grain weight.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
elevated CO2e2
Outcome
plant height and ear lengthe2
Direction
no significant effecte2
Qualifier
showed no significant effect on the 1000-grain weighte3
Comparator
(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A)e1
Setting
closed chamberse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat was grown in a pot experiment in closed chambers subjected to two concentrations of CO2 [(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A) and(760.1±36.1) μmol·mol 1(E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–568 · show in text ↑
e2

“although elevated CO2 had no significant effect on plant height and ear length”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 792–870 · show in text ↑
e3

“Elevated CO2 showed no significant effect on the 1000-grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1207 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased evapotranspiration of winter wheat by 8.5% under sufficient water conditions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
elevated CO2e2
Outcome
evapotranspiratione2
Direction
increasede2
Value
8.5%e2
Qualifier
sufficiente2
Comparator
(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A)e1
Setting
closed chamberse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat was grown in a pot experiment in closed chambers subjected to two concentrations of CO2 [(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A) and(760.1±36.1) μmol·mol 1(E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–568 · show in text ↑
e2

“Elevated CO2 increased evapotranspiration respectively by 8.5% and 4.6% under sufficient and drought water conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased evapotranspiration of winter wheat by 4.6% under drought water conditions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
elevated CO2e2
Outcome
evapotranspiratione2
Direction
increasede2
Value
4.6%e2
Qualifier
droughte2
Comparator
(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A)e1
Setting
closed chamberse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat was grown in a pot experiment in closed chambers subjected to two concentrations of CO2 [(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A) and(760.1±36.1) μmol·mol 1(E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–568 · show in text ↑
e2

“Elevated CO2 increased evapotranspiration respectively by 8.5% and 4.6% under sufficient and drought water conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1208–1325 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased population WUE of winter wheat by 17.7% under sufficient water conditions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
elevated CO2e3
Outcome
population WUEe2
Direction
increasede2
Value
17.7%e2
Qualifier
sufficiente2
Comparator
(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A)e1
Setting
closed chamberse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat was grown in a pot experiment in closed chambers subjected to two concentrations of CO2 [(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A) and(760.1±36.1) μmol·mol 1(E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–568 · show in text ↑
e2

“It also respectively increased population WUE by 17.7% and 13.7% and grain WUE by 24.8% and 17.1% under sufficient and drought water conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1469 · show in text ↑
e3

“Chlorophyll and water potential also increased under elevated CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1695 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased population WUE of winter wheat by 13.7% under drought water conditions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
elevated CO2e3
Outcome
population WUEe2
Direction
increasede2
Value
13.7%e2
Qualifier
droughte2
Comparator
(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A)e1
Setting
closed chamberse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat was grown in a pot experiment in closed chambers subjected to two concentrations of CO2 [(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A) and(760.1±36.1) μmol·mol 1(E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–568 · show in text ↑
e2

“It also respectively increased population WUE by 17.7% and 13.7% and grain WUE by 24.8% and 17.1% under sufficient and drought water conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1469 · show in text ↑
e3

“Chlorophyll and water potential also increased under elevated CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1695 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased grain WUE of winter wheat by 24.8% under sufficient water conditions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
elevated CO2e3
Outcome
grain WUEe2
Direction
increasede2
Value
24.8%e2
Qualifier
sufficiente2
Comparator
(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A)e1
Setting
closed chamberse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat was grown in a pot experiment in closed chambers subjected to two concentrations of CO2 [(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A) and(760.1±36.1) μmol·mol 1(E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–568 · show in text ↑
e2

“It also respectively increased population WUE by 17.7% and 13.7% and grain WUE by 24.8% and 17.1% under sufficient and drought water conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1469 · show in text ↑
e3

“Chlorophyll and water potential also increased under elevated CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1695 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased grain WUE of winter wheat by 17.1% under drought water conditions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
elevated CO2e3
Outcome
grain WUEe2
Direction
increasede2
Value
17.1%e2
Qualifier
droughte2
Comparator
(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A)e1
Setting
closed chamberse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat was grown in a pot experiment in closed chambers subjected to two concentrations of CO2 [(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A) and(760.1±36.1) μmol·mol 1(E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–568 · show in text ↑
e2

“It also respectively increased population WUE by 17.7% and 13.7% and grain WUE by 24.8% and 17.1% under sufficient and drought water conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1469 · show in text ↑
e3

“Chlorophyll and water potential also increased under elevated CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1695 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased Pn of winter wheat by 15.6% under sufficient water conditions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
elevated CO2e2
Outcome
Pne2
Direction
increasede2
Value
15.6%e2
Qualifier
sufficiente2
Comparator
(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A)e1
Setting
closed chamberse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat was grown in a pot experiment in closed chambers subjected to two concentrations of CO2 [(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A) and(760.1±36.1) μmol·mol 1(E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–568 · show in text ↑
e2

“Elevated CO2 increased Pn by 15.6% and 12.9%,decreased Gs by 22.7% and 18.2% and Tr by 8.9% and 7.5% under sufficient and drought water conditions,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1629 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased Pn of winter wheat by 12.9% under drought water conditions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
elevated CO2e2
Outcome
Pne2
Direction
increasede2
Value
12.9%e2
Qualifier
droughte2
Comparator
(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A)e1
Setting
closed chamberse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat was grown in a pot experiment in closed chambers subjected to two concentrations of CO2 [(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A) and(760.1±36.1) μmol·mol 1(E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–568 · show in text ↑
e2

“Elevated CO2 increased Pn by 15.6% and 12.9%,decreased Gs by 22.7% and 18.2% and Tr by 8.9% and 7.5% under sufficient and drought water conditions,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1629 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 decreased Gs of winter wheat by 22.7% under sufficient water conditions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
elevated CO2e2
Outcome
Gse2
Direction
decreasede2
Value
22.7%e2
Qualifier
sufficiente2
Comparator
(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A)e1
Setting
closed chamberse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat was grown in a pot experiment in closed chambers subjected to two concentrations of CO2 [(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A) and(760.1±36.1) μmol·mol 1(E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–568 · show in text ↑
e2

“Elevated CO2 increased Pn by 15.6% and 12.9%,decreased Gs by 22.7% and 18.2% and Tr by 8.9% and 7.5% under sufficient and drought water conditions,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1629 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 decreased Gs of winter wheat by 18.2% under drought water conditions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
elevated CO2e2
Outcome
Gse2
Direction
decreasede2
Value
18.2%e2
Qualifier
droughte2
Comparator
(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A)e1
Setting
closed chamberse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat was grown in a pot experiment in closed chambers subjected to two concentrations of CO2 [(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A) and(760.1±36.1) μmol·mol 1(E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–568 · show in text ↑
e2

“Elevated CO2 increased Pn by 15.6% and 12.9%,decreased Gs by 22.7% and 18.2% and Tr by 8.9% and 7.5% under sufficient and drought water conditions,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1629 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 decreased Tr of winter wheat by 8.9% under sufficient water conditions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
elevated CO2e2
Outcome
Tre2
Direction
decreasede2
Value
8.9%e2
Qualifier
sufficiente2
Comparator
(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A)e1
Setting
closed chamberse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat was grown in a pot experiment in closed chambers subjected to two concentrations of CO2 [(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A) and(760.1±36.1) μmol·mol 1(E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–568 · show in text ↑
e2

“Elevated CO2 increased Pn by 15.6% and 12.9%,decreased Gs by 22.7% and 18.2% and Tr by 8.9% and 7.5% under sufficient and drought water conditions,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1629 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 decreased Tr of winter wheat by 7.5% under drought water conditions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
elevated CO2e2
Outcome
Tre2
Direction
decreasede2
Value
7.5%e2
Qualifier
droughte2
Comparator
(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A)e1
Setting
closed chamberse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat was grown in a pot experiment in closed chambers subjected to two concentrations of CO2 [(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A) and(760.1±36.1) μmol·mol 1(E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–568 · show in text ↑
e2

“Elevated CO2 increased Pn by 15.6% and 12.9%,decreased Gs by 22.7% and 18.2% and Tr by 8.9% and 7.5% under sufficient and drought water conditions,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1470–1629 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 increased chlorophyll of winter wheat by 7.5% under sufficient water conditions.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume1
Treatment
elevated CO2e3
Outcome
chlorophylle2
Direction
increasede2
Value
7.5%e2
Qualifier
sufficiente2
Comparator
(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A)e1
Setting
closed chamberse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“winter wheat was grown in a pot experiment in closed chambers subjected to two concentrations of CO2 [(396.1±29.2) μmol·mol 1(A) and(760.1±36.1) μmol·mol 1(E)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 410–568 · show in text ↑
e2

“chlorophyll increased respectively by 7.5% and 3.8% under sufficient and drought water conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1789–1886 · show in text ↑
e3

“Chlorophyll and water potential also increased under elevated CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1630–1695 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

11 papers: 4 positive, 7 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

co2 · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

42 papers: 38 positive, 4 negative or no effect

37 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 69 positive, 28 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

co2 · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 124 positive, 21 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

co2 · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

203 papers: 174 positive, 29 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

199 papers more in this group

See all 203 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.