Paper · 2010 · Ganhan diqu nongye yanjiu

Effect of foliar zinc application on the micronutrients of wheat grain

Cao Yu-xian

13
claims
27
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Potential Zn-deficiency is widespread in calcareous soil in North China,and Zn concentration and its bioavailability of wheat grain could be improved by foliar Zn application in this region,however,the balance of micronutrients might be changed by Zn spraying.In order to investigate the effect of foliar Zn application on the micronutrient of wheat grain,field experiments were consecutively conducted in the first(2005~2006) and the second(2006~2007) cropping seasons.The results showed that there was no significant effect of foliar Zn application on the yield of wheat grain compared to no Zn supply.In the first and second cropping seasons,beside that the grain Zn concentrations were increased by 51.7% and 73.5% on average under the condition of Zn spraying at different growth stage compared to no Zn supply,and Fe concentrations were also increased by 12.4% and 12.9%;there were no significant effect of Zn spraying at jointing and flowering stages on the Cu concentration in wheat grain,but foliar Zn application at early grain filling and late grain filling stages decreased the Cu concentration,and there was no significant effect of Zn spraying on the grain Mn concentration;the phytic acid concentration decreased by 11.06% and 16.92% under the condition of Zn spraying compare to no Zn supply,respectively.N fertilization decreased grain Mn concentration,but increased the total content of Zn+Fe+Mn+Cu,and it decreased the phytic acid concentration of wheat grain.In conclusion,the Zn and Fe concentration of wheat grain can be increased by foliar Zn application on potentially Zn-deficient calcareous soil,and synergistic effect occurred in wheat grain when foliar Zn application was conducted;Zn spraying increased the total content of micronutrients,and at the same time,it also improved the bioavailability of grain micronutrients.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn did not significantly change wheat grain yield versus no Zn supply.

Treatment
foliar Zn applicatione0
Outcome
yield of wheat graine0
Comparator
no Zn supplye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“there was no significant effect of foliar Zn application on the yield of wheat grain compared to no Zn supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 494–603 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn increased grain Zn concentrations by 51.7% and 73.5% across the two seasons.

Treatment
Zn spraying at different growth stagee0
Outcome
grain Zn concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
51.7% and 73.5%e0
Comparator
no Zn supplye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“grain Zn concentrations were increased by 51.7% and 73.5% on average under the condition of Zn spraying at different growth stage compared to no Zn supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 661–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn increased grain Fe concentrations by 12.4% and 12.9%.

Treatment
Zn spraying at different growth stagee1
Outcome
Fe concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
12.4% and 12.9%e0
Comparator
no Zn supplye1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Fe concentrations were also increased by 12.4% and 12.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–876 · show in text ↑
e1

“Zn spraying at different growth stage compared to no Zn supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–815 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn spraying at jointing and flowering had no significant effect on wheat grain Cu concentration.

Treatment
Zn spraying at jointing and flowering stagese0
Outcome
Cu concentration in wheat graine0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“there were no significant effect of Zn spraying at jointing and flowering stages on the Cu concentration in wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–996 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn at early grain filling decreased wheat grain Cu concentration.

Treatment
foliar Zn application at early grain fillinge0
Outcome
Cu concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar Zn application at early grain filling and late grain filling stages decreased the Cu concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar Zn at late grain filling decreased wheat grain Cu concentration.

Treatment
late grain fillinge0
Outcome
Cu concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar Zn application at early grain filling and late grain filling stages decreased the Cu concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1001–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn spraying had no significant effect on grain Mn concentration.

Treatment
Zn sprayinge0
Outcome
grain Mn concentratione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“there was no significant effect of Zn spraying on the grain Mn concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1111–1187 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn spraying decreased wheat grain phytic acid concentration by 11.06% and 16.92% in the two seasons.

Treatment
Zn sprayinge0
Outcome
phytic acid concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
11.06% and 16.92%e0
Comparator
no Zn supplye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“the phytic acid concentration decreased by 11.06% and 16.92% under the condition of Zn spraying compare to no Zn supply”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1188–1307 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilization decreased wheat grain Mn concentration.

Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
grain Mn concentratione0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“N fertilization decreased grain Mn concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1369 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilization increased total wheat grain Zn, Fe, Mn and Cu content.

Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
total content of Zn+Fe+Mn+Cue0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“N fertilization decreased grain Mn concentration,but increased the total content of Zn+Fe+Mn+Cu”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1416 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N fertilization decreased wheat grain phytic acid concentration.

Treatment
N fertilizatione0
Outcome
phytic acid concentration of wheat graine0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“N fertilization decreased grain Mn concentration,but increased the total content of Zn+Fe+Mn+Cu,and it decreased the phytic acid concentration of wheat grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1321–1478 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn spraying increased total wheat grain micronutrient content.

Treatment
Zn sprayinge0
Outcome
total content of micronutrientse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Zn spraying increased the total content of micronutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–1767 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zn spraying improved the bioavailability of wheat grain micronutrients.

Treatment
Zn sprayinge0
Outcome
bioavailability of grain micronutrientse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 59–64 · show in text ↑
e0

“Zn spraying increased the total content of micronutrients,and at the same time,it also improved the bioavailability of grain micronutrients”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1710–1849 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

111 papers: 85 positive, 26 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 456 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

stage · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

15 papers: 14 positive, 1 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

application · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

115 papers: 97 positive, 18 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

111 papers more in this group

See all 115 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

288 papers: 232 positive, 56 negative or no effect

231 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

284 papers more in this group

See all 288 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 795 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.