Paper · 2005 · PubMed

[Effects of simulated acid rain and its acidified soil on soluble sugar and nitrogen contents of wheat seedlings].

Guanhe Tong; Huiling Liang

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
2
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The study showed that the cation release of simulated rain caused soil acidification and base ions release. With the decrease of simulated acid rain pH from 5.6 to 2.5, the acid rain-leached soil pH decreased from 6.06 to 3.41, and its total amount of exchange base ions decreased from 56.5 to 41.1 mmol x kg(-1). Spraying simulated acid rain on the shoots of wheat seedlings planted on such acidified soils caused a rapid decrease in the soluble sugar and nitrogen contents of wheat seedlings, and reduced some of their physiological activities. The effect of spraying simulated acid rain on the soluble sugar, nitrogen, and chlorophyll contents and photosynthetic rate of wheat stems and leaves was larger than that of acidified soil, while the effect of the latter on the soluble sugar and nitrogen contents and the physiological activity of NR and GOGAT in root system of wheat seedlings was larger than that of the former. The intensive acid rain of pH < or = 3.0 and the corresponding acidified soil had an obvious harm to the growth and physiological activity of wheat seedlings.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated acid rain spray decreased wheat seedling soluble sugar and nitrogen contents.

Taxon
wheat seedlingsTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Spraying simulated acid raine0
Outcome
soluble sugar and nitrogen contentse0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying simulated acid rain on the shoots of wheat seedlings planted on such acidified soils caused a rapid decrease in the soluble sugar and nitrogen contents of wheat seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–493 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Simulated acid rain spray reduced wheat seedling physiological activities.

Taxon
wheat seedlingsTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
Spraying simulated acid raine0
Outcome
physiological activitiese0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying simulated acid rain on the shoots of wheat seedlings planted on such acidified soils caused a rapid decrease in the soluble sugar and nitrogen contents of wheat seedlings, and reduced some of their physiological activities”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 314–545 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acid rain spray affected stem and leaf sugar, nitrogen, chlorophyll and photosynthesis more than acidified soil.

Organ / stage
stems and leavese0
Treatment
spraying simulated acid raine0
Outcome
soluble sugar, nitrogen, and chlorophyll contents and photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
largere0
Comparator
acidified soile0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The effect of spraying simulated acid rain on the soluble sugar, nitrogen, and chlorophyll contents and photosynthetic rate of wheat stems and leaves was larger than that of acidified soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 547–735 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acidified soil affected root sugar, nitrogen, NR and GOGAT activity more than acid rain spray.

Taxon
wheat seedlingsTriticum aestivume0
Organ / stage
root systeme0
Gene
NR and GOGATe0
Outcome
soluble sugar and nitrogen contents and the physiological activitye0
Direction
largere0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect of the latter on the soluble sugar and nitrogen contents and the physiological activity of NR and GOGAT in root system of wheat seedlings was larger than that of the former”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 743–926 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Intense acid rain and corresponding acidified soil harmed wheat seedling growth and physiological activity.

Taxon
wheat seedlingsTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
intensive acid rain of pH < or = 3.0 and the corresponding acidified soile0
Outcome
growth and physiological activitye0
Direction
harme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The intensive acid rain of pH < or = 3.0 and the corresponding acidified soil had an obvious harm to the growth and physiological activity of wheat seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1085 · show in text ↑

rainfall · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 2 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

rainfall · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 8 positive, 15 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

ph · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 6 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

application · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.