Abstract
In order to study the effects of supplementary irrigation and nano iron oxide on the grain yield, and some physiological and biochemical traits of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) under rain fed conditions, a factorial experiment was conducted based on a randomized complete block design with three replications in Agricultural Research Station of Ardabil, Northwest of Iran, in 2016. Factors included irrigation levels (no irrigation as the rainfed, supplementary irrigation at heading and booting stages), nano iron oxide application at four levels (without nano iron oxide as the control, application of 0.3, 0.6 and 0.9 g L-1). Application of 0.9 g L-1 nano iron oxide under rainfed condition increased soluble sugars and proline content and antioxidant enzymes activity (catalase, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase) by 129.89, 168.76, 27.64, 94.2, and 31.71%, respectively, in comparison with no application of nano iron oxide and supplementary irrigation at the booting stage. Also, there were 75.89 and 38.43 increases, respectively, in the leaf protein and grain yield with the application of 0.9 g L-1 nano iron oxide and the supplementary irrigation at the booting stage, in comparison with no application of nano iron oxide under rainfed conditions. It seems that the application of nano iron oxide and supplementary irrigation can increase the grain yield of wheat under rainfed conditions due to improving the physiological and biochemical traits.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Nano iron oxide under rainfed conditions increased wheat soluble sugars by 129.89.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume1 - Treatment
- 0.9 g L-1 nano iron oxide under rainfed conditione0
- Outcome
- soluble sugarse0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 129.89e0
- Comparator
- no application of nano iron oxide and supplementary irrigation at the booting stagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 0.9 g L-1 nano iron oxide under rainfed condition increased soluble sugars and proline content and antioxidant enzymes activity (catalase, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase) by 129.89, 168.76, 27.64, 94.2, and 31.71%, respectively, in comparison with no application of nano iron oxide and supplementary irrigation at the booting stage”
e1“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano iron oxide under rainfed conditions increased wheat proline content by 168.76.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- 0.9 g L-1 nano iron oxide under rainfed conditione0
- Outcome
- proline contente0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 168.76e0
- Comparator
- no application of nano iron oxide and supplementary irrigation at the booting stagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 0.9 g L-1 nano iron oxide under rainfed condition increased soluble sugars and proline content and antioxidant enzymes activity (catalase, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase) by 129.89, 168.76, 27.64, 94.2, and 31.71%, respectively, in comparison with no application of nano iron oxide and supplementary irrigation at the booting stage”
e1“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano iron oxide under rainfed conditions increased wheat catalase by 27.64.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- 0.9 g L-1 nano iron oxide under rainfed conditione0
- Outcome
- catalasee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 27.64e0
- Comparator
- no application of nano iron oxide and supplementary irrigation at the booting stagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 0.9 g L-1 nano iron oxide under rainfed condition increased soluble sugars and proline content and antioxidant enzymes activity (catalase, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase) by 129.89, 168.76, 27.64, 94.2, and 31.71%, respectively, in comparison with no application of nano iron oxide and supplementary irrigation at the booting stage”
e1“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano iron oxide under rainfed conditions increased wheat peroxidase by 94.2.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- 0.9 g L-1 nano iron oxide under rainfed conditione0
- Outcome
- peroxidasee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 94.2e0
- Comparator
- no application of nano iron oxide and supplementary irrigation at the booting stagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 0.9 g L-1 nano iron oxide under rainfed condition increased soluble sugars and proline content and antioxidant enzymes activity (catalase, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase) by 129.89, 168.76, 27.64, 94.2, and 31.71%, respectively, in comparison with no application of nano iron oxide and supplementary irrigation at the booting stage”
e1“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano iron oxide under rainfed conditions increased wheat polyphenol oxidase by 31.71%.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- 0.9 g L-1 nano iron oxide under rainfed conditione0
- Outcome
- polyphenol oxidasee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 31.71%e0
- Comparator
- no application of nano iron oxide and supplementary irrigation at the booting stagee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Application of 0.9 g L-1 nano iron oxide under rainfed condition increased soluble sugars and proline content and antioxidant enzymes activity (catalase, peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase) by 129.89, 168.76, 27.64, 94.2, and 31.71%, respectively, in comparison with no application of nano iron oxide and supplementary irrigation at the booting stage”
e1“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano iron oxide and supplementary irrigation increased wheat leaf protein by 75.89.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- 0.9 g L-1 nano iron oxide and the supplementary irrigation at the booting stagee0
- Outcome
- leaf proteine0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 75.89e0
- Comparator
- no application of nano iron oxide under rainfed conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there were 75.89 and 38.43 increases, respectively, in the leaf protein and grain yield with the application of 0.9 g L-1 nano iron oxide and the supplementary irrigation at the booting stage, in comparison with no application of nano iron oxide under rainfed conditions”
e1“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano iron oxide and supplementary irrigation increased wheat grain yield by 38.43.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume1
- Treatment
- 0.9 g L-1 nano iron oxide and the supplementary irrigation at the booting stagee0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 38.43e0
- Comparator
- no application of nano iron oxide under rainfed conditionse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“there were 75.89 and 38.43 increases, respectively, in the leaf protein and grain yield with the application of 0.9 g L-1 nano iron oxide and the supplementary irrigation at the booting stage, in comparison with no application of nano iron oxide under rainfed conditions”
e1“wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Authors interpreted increased wheat yield as due to improved physiological and biochemical traits.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- nano iron oxide and supplementary irrigatione0
- Outcome
- grain yielde0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Qualifier
- improving the physiological and biochemical traitse0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the application of nano iron oxide and supplementary irrigation can increase the grain yield of wheat under rainfed conditions due to improving the physiological and biochemical traits”
The same questions in other papers
iron oxide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
irrigation · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
76 papers more in this group
See all 80 papers →rainfall · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
rainfall · physiology: osmolytes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
1 paper more in this group
See all 5 papers →nanoparticle · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
28 papers more in this group
See all 32 papers →nanoparticle · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
256 papers more in this group
See all 260 papers →irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- negative
985 papers more in this group
See all 989 papers →8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.