Paper · 2012 · Hunan Agricultural Sciences

Effects of Different Ratios of Base to Topdressing for Nitrogen Fertilizer on Rice Yield and Nitrogen Absorption and Utilization of Rice

LI Ming-de

8
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Filed experiments were conducted to study effects of different ratios of base to top dressing for nitrogen fertilizer on grain yield and N use efficiency of Shengxiang 1 under the same soil basic fertility and nitrogen fertilizer rate.The results showed that adequate tillering fertilizer could increase yield by improving the tiller numbers of rice,while balanced fertilizer of base-tiller-panicle-granular fertilizer could increase yield by increasing number of effective panicles and grain.The fertilizer methods by improving the proportion of tillering fertilizer or panicle fertilizer,or balancing the application of base-tiller-panicle-granular fertilizer could promote N agronomic efficiency,physiological efficiency and dependency rate.But above methods had no significant effects on nitrogen partial factor productivity,and had negative effect on apparent nitrogen efficiency.There were significant differences among the amount of nitrogen accumulation in rice of each plant growing stages under different ratio of base to top dressing for nitrogen fertilizer.The peak periods of absorbing nitrogen appeared at tillering,booting or heading stage,therefore,the practice in rice production should balance base-tiller-panicle-granular fertilizer.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Adequate tillering fertilizer increased rice yield by improving tiller numbers.

Treatment
adequate tillering fertilizere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
improving the tiller numberse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“adequate tillering fertilizer could increase yield by improving the tiller numbers of rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–349 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Balanced base-tiller-panicle-granular fertilizer increased rice yield by increasing the number of effective panicles and grains.

Treatment
balanced fertilizer of base-tiller-panicle-granular fertilizere0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Qualifier
increasing number of effective panicles and graine0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“balanced fertilizer of base-tiller-panicle-granular fertilizer could increase yield by increasing number of effective panicles and grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 356–492 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Raising the proportion of tillering or panicle fertilizer, or balancing base-tiller-panicle-granular fertilizer, improved N agronomic efficiency, physiological efficiency and dependency rate in rice.

Treatment
improving the proportion of tillering fertilizer or panicle fertilizer,or balancing the application of base-tiller-panicle-granular fertilizere0
Outcome
N agronomic efficiency,physiological efficiency and dependency ratee0
Direction
promotee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“The fertilizer methods by improving the proportion of tillering fertilizer or panicle fertilizer,or balancing the application of base-tiller-panicle-granular fertilizer could promote N agronomic efficiency,physiological efficiency and dependency rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 493–743 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

These fertilizer methods had no significant effect on nitrogen partial factor productivity in rice.

Treatment
above methodse0
Outcome
nitrogen partial factor productivitye0
Direction
no significant effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“above methods had no significant effects on nitrogen partial factor productivity,and had negative effect on apparent nitrogen efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

These fertilizer methods had a negative effect on apparent nitrogen efficiency in rice.

Treatment
above methodse0
Outcome
apparent nitrogen efficiencye0
Direction
negative effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“above methods had no significant effects on nitrogen partial factor productivity,and had negative effect on apparent nitrogen efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 748–884 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen accumulation in rice at each growth stage differed significantly among base-to-topdressing nitrogen ratios.

Organ / stage
each plant growing stagese0
Treatment
different ratio of base to top dressing for nitrogen fertilizere0
Outcome
amount of nitrogen accumulatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“There were significant differences among the amount of nitrogen accumulation in rice of each plant growing stages under different ratio of base to top dressing for nitrogen fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–1068 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice absorbed nitrogen most at the tillering, booting or heading stage.

Organ / stage
tillering,booting or heading stagee0
Outcome
peak periods of absorbing nitrogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Rice Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–88 · show in text ↑
e0

“The peak periods of absorbing nitrogen appeared at tillering,booting or heading stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1154 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend that rice production balance base-tiller-panicle-granular fertilizer.

Outcome
balance base-tiller-panicle-granular fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the practice in rice production should balance base-tiller-panicle-granular fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1165–1251 · show in text ↑

tillage · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 21 positive, 6 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

220 papers: 202 positive, 18 negative or no effect

201 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

216 papers more in this group

See all 220 papers →

tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

729 papers: 587 positive, 142 negative or no effect

586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

725 papers more in this group

See all 729 papers →

fertilization · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

3,455 papers: 3,183 positive, 272 negative or no effect

3,182 papers in the same direction as this paper · 207 in the opposite direction · 65 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,451 papers more in this group

See all 3,455 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.