Paper · 2008

Effect of ShiMa Leaf Fertilizer on Grape

Qin Yang

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

To elucidate the effect of ShiMaleaf fertilizer on grape in four different growth period,the experiment was conducted.The result showed that in different periods the fertilizer promoted the development of berry and cluster,the berry expansion and the weight of berry and cluster.It could also increase the later' fruit yield due to higher germination ratio and fruit branch rate,and thus improve commodity value.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ShiMa leaf fertilizer promoted grape berry and cluster development.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
fertilizere0
Outcome
development of berry and clustere0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the fertilizer promoted the development of berry and cluster”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–222 · show in text ↑
t0

“Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 35–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ShiMa leaf fertilizer promoted grape berry expansion and berry and cluster weight.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
ShiMa Leaf Fertilizert0
Outcome
berry expansion and the weight of berry and clustere0
Direction
promotedt1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the berry expansion and the weight of berry and cluster”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 223–278 · show in text ↑
t0

“ShiMa Leaf Fertilizer on Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–40 · show in text ↑
t1

“the fertilizer promoted the development of berry and cluster”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 162–222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer increased grape germination ratio and fruit branch rate.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
ShiMa Leaf Fertilizert0
Outcome
germination ratio and fruit branch ratee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“due to higher germination ratio and fruit branch rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–378 · show in text ↑
t0

“ShiMa Leaf Fertilizer on Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer increased later grape fruit yield.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
ShiMa Leaf Fertilizert0
Outcome
fruit yielde0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“It could also increase the later' fruit yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 279–324 · show in text ↑
t0

“ShiMa Leaf Fertilizer on Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The fertilizer improved grape commodity value.

Taxon
Grapet0
Treatment
ShiMa Leaf Fertilizert0
Outcome
commodity valuee0
Direction
improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“and thus improve commodity value”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 379–411 · show in text ↑
t0

“ShiMa Leaf Fertilizer on Grape”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–40 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ

107 papers: 97 positive, 10 negative or no effect

96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

103 papers more in this group

See all 107 papers →

fertilization · growth · VitisPositive and negative results

51 papers: 43 positive, 8 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · VitisPositive and negative results

53 papers: 45 positive, 8 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

49 papers more in this group

See all 53 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.