Paper · 2013

Effects of Water Stress on Root and Yield of Rice at Different Growth Stages

Wang Nin

17
claims
31
verbatim quotes
4
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In this study,the effects of the water stress on rice root and yield were studied. Gui liang you 2 was taken as material and polyethylene glycol(PEG—6000)was used to simulate the different degrees of water stress.After dealt with water stress for 16 days at tillering stage and heading stage respectively,the material was supplied with nutrition as normal. The morphological traits and activity and dry matter of rice root were measured after the period of re-watering,and grain yield was measured during the mature period. The results showed that:The root activity could be enhanced owning to moderate water stress at tillering and heading stage. The drought tolerance of rice root at different stages is not the same,the root length,root surface area,root volume can be promoted owing to mild or moderate water stress during water stress of tillering stage,the promoting effects is not significant after re-watering; while water stress at heading stage,the inhibitory action of water stress to root growth is not significant,the root of light,moderate water stress was stronger than that of the control after re-watering.Ten days after re-watering at tillering stage,the qualities of root dry matter and shoot dry matter of control were the highest. Ten days after re-watering at heading stage,the quantities of root dry matter and shoot dry matter with mild and moderate treatment higher than those of the control,and there was a drastic contrast between the qualities of root dry matter and shoot dry matter and those of the control. In maturation stage,the qualities of root dry matter dealt with all kinds of water stress at tillering and heading stag are higher than those of the control. However,it was only with mild treatment at tillering stage that the quality of shoot dry matter and grain yield were higher than that of the control,The quality of shoot dry matter and grain yield with normal water treatment at heading stage was up to its summit. The grain yield with suitable water stress at tillering and heading stage do not significant reduce the yield of rice. Severe water stress does not inhibit root growth,but it decreases the yield of rice significantly.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 17

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate water stress at tillering enhanced rice root activity.

Organ / stage
tilleringe0
Treatment
moderate water stresse0
Outcome
root activitye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The root activity could be enhanced owning to moderate water stress at tillering and heading stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–647 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Moderate water stress at heading enhanced rice root activity.

Organ / stage
heading stagee0
Treatment
moderate water stresse0
Outcome
root activitye0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The root activity could be enhanced owning to moderate water stress at tillering and heading stage.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 548–647 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mild or moderate stress during tillering promoted rice root length, surface area and volume.

Organ / stage
tillering stagee0
Treatment
mild or moderate water stresse0
Outcome
root length,root surface area,root volumee0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the root length,root surface area,root volume can be promoted owing to mild or moderate water stress during water stress of tillering stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The root growth promotion after tillering stress was not significant after rewatering.

Outcome
promoting effectse0
Direction
not significante0
Qualifier
after re-wateringe0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the promoting effects is not significant after re-watering”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 859–917 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Heading-stage stress did not significantly inhibit root growth.

Treatment
water stress at heading stagee0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
not significante0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“while water stress at heading stage,the inhibitory action of water stress to root growth is not significant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After rewatering, roots following light or moderate heading-stage stress were stronger than controls.

Treatment
light,moderate water stresse0
Outcome
roote0
Direction
strongere0
Qualifier
after re-wateringe0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“the root of light,moderate water stress was stronger than that of the control after re-watering.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1027–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten days after rewatering from tillering treatment, controls had the highest root dry matter.

Organ / stage
tillering stagee0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
root dry mattere0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Ten days after re-watering at tillering stage,the qualities of root dry matter and shoot dry matter of control were the highest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1251 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten days after rewatering from tillering treatment, controls had the highest shoot dry matter.

Organ / stage
tillering stagee0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
shoot dry mattere0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Ten days after re-watering at tillering stage,the qualities of root dry matter and shoot dry matter of control were the highest.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1123–1251 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten days after rewatering from heading treatment, mild and moderate stress gave higher root dry matter than controls.

Organ / stage
heading stagee0
Treatment
mild and moderate treatmente0
Outcome
root dry mattere0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Ten days after re-watering at heading stage,the quantities of root dry matter and shoot dry matter with mild and moderate treatment higher than those of the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ten days after rewatering from heading treatment, mild and moderate stress gave higher shoot dry matter than controls.

Organ / stage
heading stagee0
Treatment
mild and moderate treatmente0
Outcome
shoot dry mattere0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“Ten days after re-watering at heading stage,the quantities of root dry matter and shoot dry matter with mild and moderate treatment higher than those of the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1252–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At maturation, root dry matter after all tested stresses at tillering and heading exceeded controls.

Organ / stage
maturation stagee0
Treatment
all kinds of water stresse0
Outcome
root dry mattere0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“In maturation stage,the qualities of root dry matter dealt with all kinds of water stress at tillering and heading stag are higher than those of the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1538–1695 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only mild tillering-stage treatment gave higher shoot dry matter than control.

Treatment
mild treatment at tillering stagee0
Outcome
shoot dry mattere0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“it was only with mild treatment at tillering stage that the quality of shoot dry matter and grain yield were higher than that of the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1704–1844 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Only mild tillering-stage treatment gave higher grain yield than control.

Treatment
mild treatment at tillering stagee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the controle0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“it was only with mild treatment at tillering stage that the quality of shoot dry matter and grain yield were higher than that of the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1704–1844 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Normal water treatment at heading produced the highest shoot dry matter and grain yield.

Organ / stage
heading stagee0
Treatment
normal water treatmente0
Outcome
shoot dry matter and grain yielde0
Direction
up to its summite0

Not reportedTaxon

Verbatim

e0

“The quality of shoot dry matter and grain yield with normal water treatment at heading stage was up to its summit.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1845–1959 · show in text ↑
t0

“Rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 45–49 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Suitable stress at tillering and heading did not significantly reduce rice grain yield.

Treatment
suitable water stresse0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
do not significant reducee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The grain yield with suitable water stress at tillering and heading stage do not significant reduce the yield of rice.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1960–2078 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe water stress did not inhibit rice root growth.

Treatment
Severe water stresse0
Outcome
root growthe0
Direction
does not inhibite0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Severe water stress does not inhibit root growth,but it decreases the yield of rice significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2079–2177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Severe water stress significantly decreased rice yield.

Treatment
Severe water stresse0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Severe water stress does not inhibit root growth,but it decreases the yield of rice significantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2079–2177 · show in text ↑

light · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

95 papers: 55 positive, 40 negative or no effect

54 papers in the same direction as this paper · 38 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

91 papers more in this group

See all 95 papers →

tillage · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

149 papers: 116 positive, 33 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

145 papers more in this group

See all 149 papers →

drought · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

282 papers: 98 positive, 184 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 182 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

278 papers more in this group

See all 282 papers →

drought · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

325 papers: 76 positive, 249 negative or no effect

248 papers in the same direction as this paper · 76 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

321 papers more in this group

See all 325 papers →

tillage · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

729 papers: 587 positive, 142 negative or no effect

586 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 27 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

725 papers more in this group

See all 729 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.