Abstract
Based on a long一term experiment of applying m icronutrients fertilizer for 18 years, the paper investigated effects of long一term applying m icronutrients fertilizer on wheat yield and N and P uptake by wheat. On the condition of applying NP fertilizer, biom ass of applying Zn,B、M n fertilizer were 6% higher than that of only applying NP fertilizer and applying KH2P04. Grain yield of applying Zn,B fertilizer were 5. 5%、6. 0% higher than that of only applying NP fertilizer, 8. 4%、8. 9% higher than that of applying KH2P04, respectively. By applying Cu fertilizer, total N and P uptake were increased by 3. 1%and 7. 7% respectively, the increase rate were 6. 0% and 5. 5% respectively when they were compared with applying KH2P04. By applying Zn fertilizer, total N and P uptake were increased by 4. 1%and 2. 5%，the increaserate were 8. 0% and 6.9% respectively when they were compared with applying KH2P04. In addition, applying Zn,Mn,Cu fertilizer were m ore benefit for uptake N by grain than applying KH2P04, applying Zn, B、 Cu fertilizer were benefit for uptake P by grain.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 9
Claim · model-written summary
Zn, B and Mn fertilizer increased wheat biomass by 6% over NP fertilizer or KH2P04.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- Zn,B、M n fertilizere0
- Outcome
- biom asse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 6%e0
- Comparator
- only applying NP fertilizer and applying KH2P04e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“biom ass of applying Zn,B、M n fertilizer were 6% higher than that of only applying NP fertilizer and applying KH2P04”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn and B fertilizer raised wheat grain yield by 5.5% and 6.0% versus NP fertilizer.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Zn,B fertilizere0
- Outcome
- Grain yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 5. 5%、6. 0%e0
- Comparator
- only applying NP fertilizere0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain yield of applying Zn,B fertilizer were 5. 5%、6. 0% higher than that of only applying NP fertilizer”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn and B fertilizer raised wheat grain yield by 8.4% and 8.9% versus KH2P04.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Zn,B fertilizere1
- Outcome
- Grain yielde1
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 8. 4%、8. 9%e0
- Comparator
- applying KH2P04e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“8. 4%、8. 9% higher than that of applying KH2P04”
e1“Grain yield of applying Zn,B fertilizer”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Cu fertilizer increased wheat total N uptake by 3.1%, or 6.0% relative to KH2P04.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Cu fertilizere0
- Outcome
- total Ne0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 3. 1%e0
- Qualifier
- 6. 0%e0
- Comparator
- applying KH2P04e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“By applying Cu fertilizer, total N and P uptake were increased by 3. 1%and 7. 7% respectively, the increase rate were 6. 0% and 5. 5% respectively when they were compared with applying KH2P04”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Cu fertilizer increased wheat total P uptake by 7.7%, or 5.5% relative to KH2P04.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Cu fertilizere0
- Outcome
- P uptakee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 7. 7%e0
- Qualifier
- 5. 5%e0
- Comparator
- applying KH2P04e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“By applying Cu fertilizer, total N and P uptake were increased by 3. 1%and 7. 7% respectively, the increase rate were 6. 0% and 5. 5% respectively when they were compared with applying KH2P04”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn fertilizer increased wheat total N uptake by 4.1%, or 8.0% relative to KH2P04.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Zn fertilizere0
- Outcome
- total Ne0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 4. 1%e0
- Qualifier
- 8. 0%e0
- Comparator
- applying KH2P04e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“By applying Zn fertilizer, total N and P uptake were increased by 4. 1%and 2. 5%，the increaserate were 8. 0% and 6.9% respectively when they were compared with applying KH2P04”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn fertilizer increased wheat total P uptake by 2.5%, or 6.9% relative to KH2P04.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Zn fertilizere0
- Outcome
- P uptakee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 2. 5%e0
- Qualifier
- 6.9%e0
- Comparator
- applying KH2P04e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“By applying Zn fertilizer, total N and P uptake were increased by 4. 1%and 2. 5%，the increaserate were 8. 0% and 6.9% respectively when they were compared with applying KH2P04”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn, Mn and Cu fertilizer benefited N uptake by wheat grain versus KH2P04.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Zn,Mn,Cu fertilizere0
- Outcome
- uptake N by graine0
- Direction
- m ore benefite0
- Comparator
- applying KH2P04e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“applying Zn,Mn,Cu fertilizer were m ore benefit for uptake N by grain than applying KH2P04”
t0“wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn, B and Cu fertilizer benefited P uptake by wheat grain.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivumt0
- Treatment
- Zn, B、 Cu fertilizere0
- Outcome
- uptake P by graine0
- Direction
- benefite0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“applying Zn, B、 Cu fertilizer were benefit for uptake P by grain”
t0“wheat”
The same questions in other papers
manganese atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
31 papers more in this group
See all 35 papers →copper atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
32 papers more in this group
See all 36 papers →boron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
61 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- no effect
72 papers more in this group
See all 76 papers →zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
376 papers more in this group
See all 380 papers →zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
507 papers more in this group
See all 511 papers →fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
955 papers more in this group
See all 959 papers →fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
3,434 papers more in this group
See all 3,438 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.