Paper · 2012 · Acta Horticulturae Sinica

The Effect of Calcium on Regulation of SA-induced Resistance to Botrytis cinerea in Tomato

YU Chao-ge

11
claims
24
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In order to explore the effect of calcium on the SA-induced resistance to Botrytis cinerea in tomato(Solanum lycopersicum).Tomato Botrytis cinerea susceptible strain'L402'was pretreated with foliar spraying 8 mmol·L1 CaCl2 and 5 mmol·L-1EGTA,respectively.Then followed by application of exogenous 2 mmol·L-1 SA,3 d before B.cinerea infection.The disease index,ROS accumulation,variations of the activities of main resistance enzymes and their gene expression were analyzed.The results show that the disease index is significantly reduced by 37.27%compared to control in SA treatment 5 d after B.cinerea infection;While in Ca+SA treatment,the disease index reduced by 18%compared to SA treatment.Theproduction rate and H2O2 content reached the highest level at 1 d and 2 d,respectively,there is difference among treatments:production rate ofand H2O2 content in tomatoes treated by Ca+ SA are 33.05%and 29.31%higher than contro(lH2O),however,under EGTA+SA treatment significantly reduced by 32.62%and 46.34%,respectively.The peak of disease defense-related enzymes activity and gene expression also exist,difference obtained among treatments:PAL,chintase andβ-1,3-glucancse treated by Ca+SA are significantly higher than control,whereas EGTA and EGTA+SA significantly suppress PAL,chitinase,β-1,3-glucanase activity.These results indicate that Ca2 +plays a positive regulatory role in the SA-induced resistance to Botrytis cinerea in tomato,which is closely related to the PAL,chitinase,β-1,3-glucanase activity and gene expression.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SA reduced tomato disease index by 37.27% against control five days after infection.

Treatment
SA treatmente0
Interactor
B.cinereaBotrytis cinereae0pathogen
Outcome
disease indexe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
37.27%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the disease index is significantly reduced by 37.27%compared to control in SA treatment 5 d after B.cinerea infection”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 495–612 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea in Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ca plus SA reduced disease index by 18% compared with SA alone.

Treatment
Ca+SA treatmente0
Interactor
Botrytis cinereaBotrytis cinereat0pathogen
Outcome
disease indexe0
Direction
reducede0
Value
18%e0
Comparator
SA treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinerea · InteractorRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“in Ca+SA treatment,the disease index reduced by 18%compared to SA treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 619–694 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea in Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ROS production rate peaked at one day.

Outcome
production ratee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1 de0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Theproduction rate and H2O2 content reached the highest level at 1 d and 2 d,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–785 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea in Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–90 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 content peaked at two days.

Outcome
H2O2 contente0
Direction
higheste0
Value
2 de0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Theproduction rate and H2O2 content reached the highest level at 1 d and 2 d,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 695–785 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea in Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ca plus SA increased ROS production rate by 33.05% versus water control.

Treatment
Ca+ SAe0
Outcome
production ratee0
Direction
highere0
Value
33.05%e0
Comparator
contro(lH2O)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“production rate ofand H2O2 content in tomatoes treated by Ca+ SA are 33.05%and 29.31%higher than contro(lH2O)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea in Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ca plus SA increased H2O2 content by 29.31% versus water control.

Treatment
Ca+ SAe0
Outcome
H2O2 contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
29.31%e0
Comparator
contro(lH2O)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“production rate ofand H2O2 content in tomatoes treated by Ca+ SA are 33.05%and 29.31%higher than contro(lH2O)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–933 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea in Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

EGTA plus SA reduced ROS production rate by 32.62%.

Treatment
EGTA+SA treatmente0
Outcome
production ratee1
Direction
reducede0
Value
32.62%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under EGTA+SA treatment significantly reduced by 32.62%and 46.34%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1020 · show in text ↑
e1

“production rate ofand H2O2 content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea in Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

EGTA plus SA reduced H2O2 content by 46.34%.

Treatment
EGTA+SA treatmente0
Outcome
H2O2 contente1
Direction
reducede0
Value
46.34%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under EGTA+SA treatment significantly reduced by 32.62%and 46.34%,respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 942–1020 · show in text ↑
e1

“production rate ofand H2O2 content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 823–858 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea in Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ca plus SA increased PAL, chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase activities relative to control.

Treatment
Ca+SAe0
Outcome
PAL,chintase andβ-1,3-glucancsee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PAL,chintase andβ-1,3-glucancse treated by Ca+SA are significantly higher than control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1228 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea in Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

EGTA suppressed PAL, chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase activities.

Treatment
EGTAe0
Outcome
PAL,chitinase,β-1,3-glucanase activitye0
Direction
suppresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“EGTA and EGTA+SA significantly suppress PAL,chitinase,β-1,3-glucanase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea in Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–90 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

EGTA plus SA suppressed PAL, chitinase and β-1,3-glucanase activities.

Treatment
EGTA+SAe0
Outcome
PAL,chitinase,β-1,3-glucanase activitye0
Direction
suppresse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“EGTA and EGTA+SA significantly suppress PAL,chitinase,β-1,3-glucanase activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1237–1315 · show in text ↑
t0

“Botrytis cinerea in Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–90 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · physiology: oxidative · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: oxidative · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

33 papers: 30 positive, 3 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

calcium atom · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

79 papers: 67 positive, 12 negative or no effect

66 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

75 papers more in this group

See all 79 papers →

salicylic acid · Botrytis cinerea · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 6 positive, 1 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

salicylic acid · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 45 positive, 3 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

calcium atom · Botrytis cinerea · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.