Paper · 2016 · Acta fytotechnica et zootechnica/Acta fytotechnica et zootechnica

Effect of nitrogen-sulphur nutrition and inhibitors of nitrification on the yield and quality of maize grain

Otto Ložek; Pavol Slamka

10
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Received: 2015-10-03 | Accepted: 2016-03-03 | Available online: 2016-05-30 dx.doi.org/10.15414/afz.2016.19.02.45-50 Effect of split application of nitrogen and nitrogen+sulphur nutrition in comparison with one shot application of nitrogen + sulphur + inhibitors of nitrification (dikyandiamid, DCD and 1, 2, 4 triazol,TZ) on the yield and quality of maize grain was examined in three-year small-plot experiment with maize (hybrid ,Chapalu FAO 350) on medium heavy degraded brownsoil. On the average of three experimental years one-shot application of nitrogen-sulphur nutrition in the form of ENSIN fertilizer containing nitrification inhibitors applied before maize seeding at the rate of 160 kg.ha -1 N and 80 kg.ha -1 S showed the most considerable effect on all investigated parameters. Yield of grain was increased highly significantly by 1.56 t.ha -1 (+21.8%) against control treatment. Both parameters TKW (thousand kernel weight) and content of crude protein were elevated by 7.9% and 8.3%, respectively. Production of protein per hectare was increased by 253 kg, that is by 31.9% and natural effectiveness of fertilization achieved the highest value, namely 9.8 kg of grain per 1 kg of applied nitrogen. When fertilizer ENSIN (contains inhibitors of nitrification) was applied in maize nutrition the achieved results were insignificantly better in all examined parameters in comparison with the split application of DASA 26/13 fertilizer under the same rate of both nitrogen and sulphur. There was found out positive tendency of favourable effect on yield and quality of grain of maize and decrease of application costs as a consequence of one shot application in this treatment. Addition of sulphur to nitrogen as well as an addition of inhibitors + sulphur to nitrogen significantly increased only grain yield of maize. Content of crude protein and TKW were increased insignificantly. Natural effectiveness of nitrogen fertilization was increasing in accordance with raising yields of maize grain as follows: nitrogen < nitrogen + sulphur < nitrogen + sulphur + inhibitors. Keywords: growth stage, inhibitors, nitrification, nitrogen, split References Asing, J. et al. (2008) Assessment of nitrogen losses from urea and an organic manure with and without nitrification inhibitor, dicyandiamide, applied to lettuce under glasshouse conditions. Australian Journal of Soil Research, vol. 46, pp. 535–541. Beever, D. et al. (2007) Sustainable Management of the Nitrogen Cycle in Agriculture and Mitigation of Reactive Nitrogen Side Effects. International Fertilizer Industry Association , ISBN 2-9523139-1-1, www.fertilizer.org/ifa/publicat/pdf/2007_ifa_reactive%20nitrogen.pdf Bergmann, W. and Neubert, P. (1976) Pflanzendiagnose und Pflanzenanalyze. Jena: VEBC Fischer, 711 p. Cassmann, K.G., Dobermann, A. and Walters, D.T. (2002) Agroecosystems, nitrogen use efficiency, and nitrogen management. Ambio , vol. 31, no. 2 , pp. 132-140. COHEN, J. B. (1910) Practical Organic Chemistry. London: MacMillan, 356 p. Di, H.J. and Cameron, K.C. (2002) Nitrate leaching in temperate agroecosystems: sources, factors and mitigating strategies. Nutrient Cycling in Agroecosystems , vol. 46 , pp. 237-256. Di, H.J. and Cameron, K.C. (2004) Effects of the nitrification inhibitor dicyandiamide on potassium, magnesium and calcium leaching in grazed grassland . Soil use and management . vol. 20, pp. 2-7 Di, H.J. et al. (2010) Ammonia oxidizing bacteria and archaea grow under contrasting soil nitrogen conditions. FEMS Microbiology Ecology , vol. 72 , pp. 386–394. Dobermann, A. (2005) Nitrogen Use Efficiency – State of the Art. IFA International Workshop on Enhanced–Efficiency Fertilizers, www.fertilizer.org/ifa/publicat/PDF/2005_ag_frankfurt_doberman.pdf Fecenko, J. and Ložek, O. (2000) Nutrition and fertilization of field crops . Nitra: SPU v Nitre and Duslo, a.s. Šaľa. 442 p. (in Slovak) Galloway, J.N. et al. ( 2003) The Nitrogen Cascade. BioScience, vol. 53, no. 4, pp. 341-356. Hanáčková, E. and Žembery, J. (2015) Effect of selected factors on the grain maize yield. Agrochémia (Agrochemistry ), vol. 19(55), no. 1, pp. 6-13. (in Slovak) Ivanič, J., Havelka, B. and Knop, K. (1984) Nutrition and fertilization of plants . Príroda Bratislava, SZN Praha, 255 p.(in Slovak). Khalil, M. I., Gutser, R. and Schmidhalter, U.(2009) Effects of urease and nitrification inhibitors added to urea on nitrous oxide emissions from a loess soil . J. Plant Nutr. Soil Sci. vol. 172 , pp. 651–660. Kramer, S.B. et al. (2007) Reduced nitrate leaching and enhanced denitrifier activity and efficiency in organically fertilizer soils. Proceedings of National Academy of Science , vol. 103 , pp. 4522-4527. Laboski, C. (2006) Does it pay to use nitrification and urease inhibitors?: Proc. of the 2006 Wisconsin Fertilizer, Aglime & Pest Management Conference , vol. 45, pp . 44-50 Ladha, J.K., et al. (2005) Efficiency of fertilizer nitrogen in cereal production: Retrospects and prospects. Advances in Agronomy , vol. 87, pp . 85-156. Ledgard, S. F. (2001) Nitrogen cycling in low input legume-based agriculture, withemphasis on legume/grass pastures. Plant and Soil , vol. 228 , pp . 43-59 Macadam, X.M.B. et al. (2003) Dicyandiamide and 3,4-dimethyl pyrazole phosphate decrease N 2 O emissions from grassland but dicyandiamide produces deleterious effects in clover. Journal of plant physiology , vol. 160 , pp . 1517-1523. Malý, S., Šarapatka, B. and Kršková, M. (2002) Seasonal variability in soil nitrogen mineralization and nitrification as influenced by N fertilization. Rostlinná výroba , vol. 48 , no . 9, pp.389-396. (in Slovak) Marendiak, P., Kopčanová, Ľ. and Leistgeb, S. (1987) Agrocultural microbiology . Príroda Bratislava, pp. 433.(in Slovak) Merino, P. et al.(2002) Mitigation of N 2 O emissions from grassland by nitrification inhibitor and Actilith F2 applied with fertilizer and cattle slurry. Soil use and management . vol. 18 , pp . 135-141. Richter, R. and Hlušek, J. (1994) Nutrition and fertilization of plants. Brno: MZLU, 177 p. (in Slovak) Richter, R. and Ryant, P. (2008) In. Zimolka, J. a kol. 2008. Maize. Proffi Press, s.r.o. Praha, pp. 111-134. (in Czech) Slamka, P., Ložek, O. and Hanáčková, E. (2014) Effect of urea containing inhibitors on nitrate portion in soil and grain yield of winter whear. Research Journal of Agricultural Science , vol. 46, no. 3, pp. 79-89 (in Slovak) Trenkel, M.E. (1997) Improving Fertilizer Use Efficiency-Controlled-Release and Stabilized Fertilizers in Agriculture . Paris: International Fertilizer Industry Association. VANĚK, V. et al. (2007) Nutrition and fertilization of field and garden crops. Praha: Profi Press, 167 p. (in Czech). VaNĚk, V. et al. (2013) Nutrition of field and garden crops. Nitra: Profi Press,175 p. (in Czech) Zimolka J. et al. (2008) Maize-main and alternative utilization. Praha: Profi Press. 200 p. (in Czech).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

One-shot ENSIN fertilization increased maize grain yield by 1.56 t.ha -1 (+21.8%) relative to control.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
ENSIN fertilizer containing nitrification inhibitorse0
Outcome
Yield of graine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
1.56 t.ha -1 (+21.8%)e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“one-shot application of nitrogen-sulphur nutrition in the form of ENSIN fertilizer containing nitrification inhibitors applied before maize seeding at the rate of 160 kg.ha -1 N and 80 kg.ha -1 S showed the most considerable effect on all investigated parameters. Yield of grain was increased highly significantly by 1.56 t.ha -1 (+21.8%) against control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 531–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ENSIN fertilization elevated maize thousand kernel weight by 7.9%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ENSIN fertilizere1
Outcome
TKW (thousand kernel weight)e0
Direction
elevatede0
Value
7.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both parameters TKW (thousand kernel weight) and content of crude protein were elevated by 7.9% and 8.3%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1016 · show in text ↑
e1

“ENSIN fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–613 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ENSIN fertilization elevated maize crude protein content by 8.3%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ENSIN fertilizere1
Outcome
content of crude proteine0
Direction
elevatede0
Value
8.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both parameters TKW (thousand kernel weight) and content of crude protein were elevated by 7.9% and 8.3%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 897–1016 · show in text ↑
e1

“ENSIN fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–613 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ENSIN fertilization increased maize protein production by 253 kg, or 31.9%.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ENSIN fertilizere1
Outcome
Production of protein per hectaree0
Direction
increasede0
Value
253 kge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Production of protein per hectare was increased by 253 kg, that is by 31.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1017–1092 · show in text ↑
e1

“ENSIN fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–613 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ENSIN fertilization had the highest nitrogen-use effectiveness, 9.8 kg grain per 1 kg nitrogen.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
ENSIN fertilizere1
Outcome
natural effectiveness of fertilizatione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
9.8 kg of grain per 1 kg of applied nitrogene0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“natural effectiveness of fertilization achieved the highest value, namely 9.8 kg of grain per 1 kg of applied nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1097–1215 · show in text ↑
e1

“ENSIN fertilizer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–613 · show in text ↑
t0

“maize grain”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ENSIN results were insignificantly better than split DASA at equal nitrogen and sulphur rates.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse1
Treatment
fertilizer ENSINe1
Outcome
all examined parameterse0
Direction
insignificantly bettere0
Comparator
split application of DASA 26/13 fertilizere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the achieved results were insignificantly better in all examined parameters in comparison with the split application of DASA 26/13 fertilizer under the same rate of both nitrogen and sulphur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1309–1499 · show in text ↑
e1

“fertilizer ENSIN (contains inhibitors of nitrification) was applied in maize nutrition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1222–1308 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding sulphur to nitrogen significantly increased maize grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
Addition of sulphur to nitrogene0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
nitrogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of sulphur to nitrogen as well as an addition of inhibitors + sulphur to nitrogen significantly increased only grain yield of maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1834 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding inhibitors and sulphur to nitrogen significantly increased maize grain yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
addition of inhibitors + sulphur to nitrogene0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
nitrogene0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Addition of sulphur to nitrogen as well as an addition of inhibitors + sulphur to nitrogen significantly increased only grain yield of maize.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1834 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivenot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulphur and inhibitor additions increased maize crude protein and thousand kernel weight without statistical significance.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse2
Treatment
Addition of sulphur to nitrogene1
Outcome
Content of crude protein and TKWe0
Direction
increased insignificantlye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Content of crude protein and TKW were increased insignificantly.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1835–1899 · show in text ↑
e1

“Addition of sulphur to nitrogen as well as an addition of inhibitors + sulphur to nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1693–1783 · show in text ↑
e2

“grain yield of maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1813–1833 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilization effectiveness rose in the order nitrogen, nitrogen plus sulphur, then nitrogen plus sulphur plus inhibitors.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Outcome
Natural effectiveness of nitrogen fertilizatione0
Direction
increasinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Natural effectiveness of nitrogen fertilization was increasing in accordance with raising yields of maize grain as follows: nitrogen < nitrogen + sulphur < nitrogen + sulphur + inhibitors.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1900–2088 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

15 papers: 13 positive, 2 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive
    Omitting sulfur and potassium significantly lowered maize grain crude protein, fat and fiber content.

    Maize Grain Quality as Influenced by 46 Years’ Continuous Application of Fertilizers, Farmyard Manure (FYM), and Lime in an Alfisol of North-western Himalayas · 2020 · compared with the treatments where sulfur and potassium were applied along with nitrogen and phosphorus

    Same directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

82 papers: 69 positive, 13 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

78 papers more in this group

See all 82 papers →

nitrification inhibitor · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 31 positive, 9 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

181 papers: 164 positive, 17 negative or no effect

163 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

177 papers more in this group

See all 181 papers →

fertilization · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 236 positive, 26 negative or no effect

235 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

fertilization · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

3,908 papers: 3,485 positive, 423 negative or no effect

3,484 papers in the same direction as this paper · 338 in the opposite direction · 85 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,904 papers more in this group

See all 3,908 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.