Paper · 2004 · PubMed

Importance of explant size and origin and of preconditioning treatments for cryopreservation of garlic shoot apices by vitrification.

Hyung-Jin Baek; Haeng-Hoon Kim; Eun-Gi Cho; et al.

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
37
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This paper investigates the effect of the origin and size of the explants employed and of the preconditioning (cold acclimation, preculture) and loading treatments on survival and regeneration of cryopreserved garlic shoot apices using vitrification with the PVS3 vitrification solution. Both the origin and size of explants had a significant effect on regeneration of cryopreserved apices. Higher regeneration was generally observed with apices excised from bulbs and bulbils, followed by cloves, and those originated from larger propagules regrew more rapidly. Smaller apices (1.5 or 3.0 mm in diameter) displayed higher regeneration than large ones (4.5 mm in diameter). Cold acclimation at 5 degree C of apices before freezing had no positive effect on regeneration after cryopreservation. Preculture of apices at 10 or 23 degree C for more than 3 days had a detrimental effect on regeneration. The optimal sucrose concentration in the preculture medium was 0.3-0.5 M. Loading apices for 30 or 60 min at 23 degree C in medium containing 2 M glycerol + 0.4 M sucrose or 1 M glycerol + 0.8 M sucrose had no effect on regeneration after cryopreservation, in comparison with apices cryopreserved without loading treatment. Under optimal conditions, regeneration of cryopreserved apices sampled from large cloves was above 90 percent.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Explant origin and size significantly affected regeneration of cryopreserved garlic apices.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Material
origin and size of explantse0
Outcome
regeneration of cryopreserved apicese0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both the origin and size of explants had a significant effect on regeneration of cryopreserved apices.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 288–390 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic shoot apices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–229 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Garlic apices from bulbs and bulbils generally regenerated more than those from cloves.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Material
bulbs and bulbilse0
Outcome
regeneratione0
Direction
Highere0
Comparator
clovese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Higher regeneration was generally observed with apices excised from bulbs and bulbils, followed by cloves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–496 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic shoot apices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–229 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Apices from larger garlic propagules regrew more rapidly.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Material
larger propagulese0
Outcome
regrewe0
Direction
more rapidlye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“those originated from larger propagules regrew more rapidly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 502–561 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic shoot apices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–229 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Smaller garlic apices regenerated more than large apices.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Material
Smaller apicese0
Outcome
regeneratione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
1.5 or 3.0 mm in diametere0
Comparator
large onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Smaller apices (1.5 or 3.0 mm in diameter) displayed higher regeneration than large ones (4.5 mm in diameter).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 563–673 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic shoot apices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cold acclimation at 5 degree C had no positive effect on garlic apex regeneration after cryopreservation.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
Cold acclimation at 5 degree Ce0
Outcome
regeneration after cryopreservatione0
Direction
no positive effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Cold acclimation at 5 degree C of apices before freezing had no positive effect on regeneration after cryopreservation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic shoot apices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Preculture at 10 or 23 degree C for more than three days harmed garlic apex regeneration.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
Preculture of apices at 10 or 23 degree C for more than 3 dayse0
Outcome
regeneratione0
Direction
detrimental effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Preculture of apices at 10 or 23 degree C for more than 3 days had a detrimental effect on regeneration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–898 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic shoot apices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–229 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The optimal preculture sucrose concentration for garlic apices was 0.3–0.5 M.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Outcome
optimal sucrose concentratione0
Value
0.3-0.5 Me0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The optimal sucrose concentration in the preculture medium was 0.3-0.5 M.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–972 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic shoot apices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–229 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Loading garlic apices with either glycerol–sucrose mixture did not affect regeneration relative to no loading.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
Loading apices for 30 or 60 min at 23 degree C in medium containing 2 M glycerol + 0.4 M sucrose or 1 M glycerol + 0.8 M sucrosee0
Outcome
regeneration after cryopreservatione0
Direction
no effecte0
Comparator
apices cryopreserved without loading treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Loading apices for 30 or 60 min at 23 degree C in medium containing 2 M glycerol + 0.4 M sucrose or 1 M glycerol + 0.8 M sucrose had no effect on regeneration after cryopreservation, in comparison with apices cryopreserved without loading treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1222 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic shoot apices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–229 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under optimal conditions, regeneration of cryopreserved garlic apices from large cloves exceeded 90 percent.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Material
large clovese0
Outcome
regeneration of cryopreserved apicese0
Direction
abovee0
Value
90 percente0
Qualifier
Under optimal conditionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under optimal conditions, regeneration of cryopreserved apices sampled from large cloves was above 90 percent.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1223–1333 · show in text ↑
t0

“garlic shoot apices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 210–229 · show in text ↑

sucrose · growth · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

cold · growth · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

in vitro · growth · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 24 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.