Abstract
In order to evaluate the effect of phosphate and Zn bio-fertilizers on the yield, phytic acid (PA), Zn concentration and PA/Zn molar ratio in bean, a field experiment was carried out for two years. The treatments included two cultivars of bean (Talash and Sadri), four levels of P (P0, P1: 100 kg ha-1 triple super phosphate (TSP), P2: 50 kg ha-1 TSP + phosphate bio-fertilizer, P3: phosphate bio-fertilizer), three levels of Zn (Zn0, Zn1: 50 kg ha-1 ZnSO4, Zn2: Zn bio-fertilizer). Phosphate bio-fertilizer consisted of inoculum of mycorrhizal fungus and Azotobacter and Zn bio-fertilizer consisted of Pseudomonas bacteria. The results revealed that there was significant difference between yield and Zn concentration between years. The effect of cultivar was significant on studied parameters. The lowest content of PA and PA/Zn were obtained from Talash. P treatment caused to significant difference on parameters in which P2 caused to increase yield, P and Zn concentration, and decrease PA and PA/Zn by 21.8%, 38.2%, 33.4%, 17.4% and 38.6% respectively. Zn treatment caused to significant difference on studied parameters. The maximum number of parameters were obtained from Zn1 and Zn2. The higher Zn concentration led to lower content of PA and PA/Zn. Using of P and Zn bio–fertilizers were caused to increasing nutrient uptake, improving growth condition and reducing PA and PA/Zn molar ratio.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 14
Claim · model-written summary
Bean yield and Zn concentration differed significantly between the two years of the field experiment.
Verbatim
t0“Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.)”
e0“there was significant difference between yield and Zn concentration between years”
Claim · model-written summary
Bean cultivar had a significant effect on the studied parameters.
Verbatim
t0“Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.)”
e0“The effect of cultivar was significant on studied parameters”
Claim · model-written summary
The lowest content of phytic acid and PA/Zn was obtained from the bean cultivar Talash.
Verbatim
t0“Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.)”
e0“The lowest content of PA and PA/Zn were obtained from Talash”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment P2 (50 kg ha-1 TSP plus phosphate bio-fertilizer) increased bean yield by 21.8%.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.)”
e0“P treatment caused to significant difference on parameters in which P2 caused to increase yield, P and Zn concentration, and decrease PA and PA/Zn by 21.8%, 38.2%, 33.4%, 17.4% and 38.6% respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment P2 increased P concentration in bean by 38.2%.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.)”
e0“P treatment caused to significant difference on parameters in which P2 caused to increase yield, P and Zn concentration, and decrease PA and PA/Zn by 21.8%, 38.2%, 33.4%, 17.4% and 38.6% respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment P2 increased Zn concentration in bean by 33.4%.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.)”
e0“P treatment caused to significant difference on parameters in which P2 caused to increase yield, P and Zn concentration, and decrease PA and PA/Zn by 21.8%, 38.2%, 33.4%, 17.4% and 38.6% respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment P2 decreased phytic acid (PA) in bean by 17.4%.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.)”
e0“P treatment caused to significant difference on parameters in which P2 caused to increase yield, P and Zn concentration, and decrease PA and PA/Zn by 21.8%, 38.2%, 33.4%, 17.4% and 38.6% respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment P2 decreased the PA/Zn molar ratio in bean by 38.6%.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.)”
e0“P treatment caused to significant difference on parameters in which P2 caused to increase yield, P and Zn concentration, and decrease PA and PA/Zn by 21.8%, 38.2%, 33.4%, 17.4% and 38.6% respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Zn treatment caused a significant difference in the studied bean parameters.
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Verbatim
t0“Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.)”
e0“Zn treatment caused to significant difference on studied parameters”
Claim · model-written summary
The maximum number of studied parameters were obtained from Zn1 and Zn2.
Verbatim
t0“Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.)”
e0“The maximum number of parameters were obtained from Zn1 and Zn2”
Claim · model-written summary
Higher Zn concentration was associated with lower content of phytic acid and PA/Zn in bean.
Verbatim
t0“Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.)”
e0“The higher Zn concentration led to lower content of PA and PA/Zn”
Claim · model-written summary
P and Zn bio-fertilizers increased nutrient uptake in bean.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.)”
e0“Using of P and Zn bio–fertilizers were caused to increasing nutrient uptake”
Claim · model-written summary
P and Zn bio-fertilizers improved growth condition in bean.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.)”
e0“Using of P and Zn bio–fertilizers were caused to increasing nutrient uptake, improving growth condition”
Claim · model-written summary
P and Zn bio-fertilizers reduced phytic acid and the PA/Zn molar ratio in bean.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Bean (Phaseolus Vulgaris L.)”
e0“Using of P and Zn bio–fertilizers were caused to increasing nutrient uptake, improving growth condition and reducing PA and PA/Zn molar ratio”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →zinc atom · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →inoculation · growth · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Results differ
105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
122 papers more in this group
See all 126 papers →inoculation · molecular: metabolites · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
11 papers more in this group
See all 15 papers →inoculation · nutrient: content · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
39 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
40 papers more in this group
See all 44 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.