Paper · 2015 · Agrotechnology

The optimal atmospheric CO2 concentration for the growth of winter wheat (Triticum aestivum)

Ming Xu

12
claims
22
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This study examined the optimal atmospheric CO2 concentration of the CO2 fertilization effect on the growth of winter wheat with growth chambers where the CO2 concentration was controlled at 400, 600, 800, 1000, and 1200 ppm respectively. I found that initial increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration dramatically enhanced winter wheat growth through the CO2 fertilization effect. However, this CO2 fertilization effect was substantially compromised with further increase in CO2 concentration, demonstrating an optimal CO2 concentration of 889.6, 909.4, and 894.2 ppm for aboveground, belowground, and total biomass, respectively, and 967.8 ppm for leaf photosynthesis. Also, high CO2 concentrations exceeding the optima not only reduced leaf stomatal density, length and conductance, but also changed the spatial distribution pattern of stomata on leaves. In addition, high CO2 concentration also decreased the maximum carboxylation rate (Vc(max)) and the maximum electron transport rate (J(max)) of leaf photosynthesis. However, the high CO2 concentration had little effect on leaf length and plant height. The optimal CO2 fertilization effect found in this study can be used as an indicator in selecting and breeding new wheat strains in adapting to future high atmospheric CO2 concentrations and climate change.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Initial CO2 increases enhanced winter wheat growth.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
increase in atmospheric CO2 concentratione0
Outcome
winter wheat growthe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“initial increase in atmospheric CO2 concentration dramatically enhanced winter wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 252–343 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Further CO2 increases compromised the fertilization effect.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
further increase in CO2 concentratione0
Outcome
CO2 fertilization effecte0
Direction
compromisede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“this CO2 fertilization effect was substantially compromised with further increase in CO2 concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–493 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

aboveground

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
abovegrounde0
Value
889.6e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“optimal CO2 concentration of 889.6, 909.4, and 894.2 ppm for aboveground, belowground, and total biomass, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–630 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

belowground

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
belowgrounde0
Value
909.4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“optimal CO2 concentration of 889.6, 909.4, and 894.2 ppm for aboveground, belowground, and total biomass, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–630 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

total biomass

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
total biomasse0
Value
894.2 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“optimal CO2 concentration of 889.6, 909.4, and 894.2 ppm for aboveground, belowground, and total biomass, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 512–630 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

leaf photosynthesis

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
leaf photosynthesise0
Value
967.8 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“967.8 ppm for leaf photosynthesis”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–669 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CO2 above the optimum reduced stomatal density, length, and conductance.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
high CO2 concentrations exceeding the optimae0
Outcome
leaf stomatal density, length and conductancee0
Direction
reducede0
Comparator
optimae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high CO2 concentrations exceeding the optima not only reduced leaf stomatal density, length and conductance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 677–784 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

spatial distribution pattern of stomata on leaves

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
spatial distribution pattern of stomata on leavese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“changed the spatial distribution pattern of stomata on leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 795–856 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High CO2 decreased maximum carboxylation rate.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
high CO2 concentratione0
Outcome
maximum carboxylation rate (Vc(max))e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high CO2 concentration also decreased the maximum carboxylation rate (Vc(max))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–949 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High CO2 decreased maximum electron transport rate.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
high CO2 concentratione0
Outcome
maximum electron transport rate (J(max))e0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“high CO2 concentration also decreased the maximum carboxylation rate (Vc(max)) and the maximum electron transport rate (J(max))”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–998 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High CO2 had little effect on leaf length or plant height.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
high CO2 concentratione0
Outcome
leaf length and plant heighte0
Direction
little effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the high CO2 concentration had little effect on leaf length and plant height”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1032–1108 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 60–72 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors propose the optimal CO2 effect as an indicator for breeding adapted wheat strains.

Outcome
selecting and breeding new wheat strainse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“can be used as an indicator in selecting and breeding new wheat strains in adapting to future high atmospheric CO2 concentrations and climate change”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1315 · show in text ↑

co2 · physiology: gas exchange · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

28 papers: 14 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

co2 · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

97 papers: 69 positive, 28 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

93 papers more in this group

See all 97 papers →

co2 · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 124 positive, 21 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.