Paper · 2017 · Research on Crops

Mitigating zinc deficiency through integration of agronomic biofortification for achieving high zinc wheat grain in northern states of India

Brijesh Kumar; Vivek Yadav; Naleeni Ramawat; et al.

7
claims
13
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Twenty-five field experiments on wheat as test crop were conducted across four northern states of India viz., Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Haryana and Himachal Pradesh during 2014–15 and 2015–16 to investigate the effect of soil and foliar applications of zinc (Zn) on wheat grain yield and grain Zn concentration. Experimental design was complete randomized block design with three replicates. Wheat crop was grown under three different Zn application rates as follows: (i) Control (no Zn application), (ii) Soil Zn application, and (iii) Foliar Zn application. The soil Zn treatment consisted of 50 kg ZnSO4.7H2O ha applied to the soil before sowing of wheat. The foliar Zn treatment, a 0.5% (w/v) aqueous solution of ZnSO4.7H2O was realized two times i. e. first at anthesis or heading and the second one at early milk stage of wheat crop. Results showed that the application of Zn fertilizer in soil increased grain yield of wheat significantly over control at 23 locations during both the years. However, the effect of foliar Zn fertilizer on grain yield was quite less effective. The foliar Zn application resulted in significant increment in grain Zn concentration over control at all locations. In particular, soil Zn application markedly increased grain yield and slightly less content of grain Zn over foliar Zn application. However, foliar application of Zn at specific stages was an important agronomic practice for the farmers to enhance wheat grains with zinc to mitigate hidden hunger. In conclusion, agronomic biofortification was found to be most suitable for both optimum grain yield and grain biofortification of wheat to combat Zn deficiency.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil zinc application significantly increased wheat grain yield over control at 23 locations in both years.

Treatment
application of Zn fertilizer in soile1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
controle1
Setting
northern states of Indiae2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Results showed that the application of Zn fertilizer in soil increased grain yield of wheat significantly over control at 23 locations during both the years”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 837–993 · show in text ↑
e2

“Twenty-five field experiments on wheat as test crop were conducted across four northern states of India viz., Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Haryana and Himachal Pradesh during 2014–15 and 2015–16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc fertilizer was quite less effective than soil application for wheat grain yield.

Treatment
foliar Zn fertilizere3
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
less effectivee3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“However, the effect of foliar Zn fertilizer on grain yield was quite less effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 995–1078 · show in text ↑
e2

“Twenty-five field experiments on wheat as test crop were conducted across four northern states of India viz., Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Haryana and Himachal Pradesh during 2014–15 and 2015–16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc application significantly increased wheat grain zinc concentration over control at all locations.

Treatment
foliar Zn applicatione4
Outcome
grain Zn concentratione4
Direction
incremente4
Comparator
controle4
Setting
all locationse4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The foliar Zn application resulted in significant increment in grain Zn concentration over control at all locations”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1195 · show in text ↑
e2

“Twenty-five field experiments on wheat as test crop were conducted across four northern states of India viz., Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Haryana and Himachal Pradesh during 2014–15 and 2015–16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil zinc application markedly increased wheat grain yield relative to foliar zinc application.

Treatment
soil Zn applicatione5
Outcome
grain yielde5
Direction
markedly increasede5
Comparator
foliar Zn applicatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“In particular, soil Zn application markedly increased grain yield and slightly less content of grain Zn over foliar Zn application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1327 · show in text ↑
e2

“Twenty-five field experiments on wheat as test crop were conducted across four northern states of India viz., Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Haryana and Himachal Pradesh during 2014–15 and 2015–16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–188 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil zinc application gave slightly lower wheat grain zinc content than foliar zinc application.

Treatment
soil Zn applicatione5
Outcome
content of grain Zne5
Direction
slightly lesse5
Comparator
foliar Zn applicatione5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“In particular, soil Zn application markedly increased grain yield and slightly less content of grain Zn over foliar Zn application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1197–1327 · show in text ↑
e2

“Twenty-five field experiments on wheat as test crop were conducted across four northern states of India viz., Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Haryana and Himachal Pradesh during 2014–15 and 2015–16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–188 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc application at specific stages is an important practice to enhance wheat grain zinc.

Treatment
foliar application of Zn at specific stagese6
Outcome
enhance wheat grains with zince6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“However, foliar application of Zn at specific stages was an important agronomic practice for the farmers to enhance wheat grains with zinc to mitigate hidden hunger”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1493 · show in text ↑
e2

“Twenty-five field experiments on wheat as test crop were conducted across four northern states of India viz., Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Haryana and Himachal Pradesh during 2014–15 and 2015–16”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–188 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Agronomic biofortification was found most suitable for both optimum wheat grain yield and grain biofortification.

Treatment
agronomic biofortificatione7
Outcome
optimum grain yield and grain biofortificatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“agronomic biofortification was found to be most suitable for both optimum grain yield and grain biofortification of wheat to combat Zn deficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1510–1655 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

111 papers: 85 positive, 26 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 85 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

107 papers more in this group

See all 111 papers →

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

81 papers in the same direction as this paper · 795 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.