Paper · 2017 · Indian Journal of Weed Science

Evaluation of herbicide combinations for controlling complex weed flora in wheat

S.S. Rana; D. Badiyala; Parita Brari

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
8
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the Rabi seasons of 2014–15 and 2015–16 on a silty clay loam soil at Palampur. Avena ludoviciana (36.3%), Phalaris minor (27.5%), Lolium temulentum (13.9%), Anagallis arvensis (10%) and Coronopus didymus (6.9) were the major weeds. Herbicide combinations (pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha + metribuzin 175 g/ha, pendimethalin 1.0 kg/ha fb sulfosulfuron 18 g/ha, sulfosulfuron 20 g/ha + metsulfuron 4 g/ha, pinoxaden 60 g/ha + metsulfuron 4 g/ha, clodinafop 60 g/ha + metsulfuron 4 g/ha, isoproturon 1.0 kg/ha + 2,4-D 0.5 kg/ha) were superior to sole application of herbicides (pendimethalin 1.25 kg/ha, sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha, metribuzin 210 g/ha and clodinafop 60 g/ha) in reducing weed count and dry weight and increasing plant height, number of tillers, crop dry matter, yield attributes and yield of wheat. Clodinafop + metsulfuron, pinoxaden + metsulfuron and pendimethalin fb metsulfuron being better than other combinations gave 28.6, 22.5 and 23.1% higher grain yield of wheat over hand weeding twice. Weeds reduced the grain yield by 51.9%. With unit increase in weed count per m2, the wheat grain yield was decreased by 13.3 kg/ha. The cost of weed control under herbicidal treatments was 9.0–28.9% of that under hand weeding lowest being under metribuzin and highest under pendimethalin fb sulfosulfuron. Clodinafop + metsulfuron gave the highest net returns due to weed control and marginal benefit: cost ratio (MBCR). Clodinafop + metsulfuron resulted in highest weed control efficiency (WCE), weed control index (WCI), crop resistance index (CRI), treatment efficiency index, crop intensity index and weed index. Weed management index, agronomic management index and integrated weed management index were highest under sulfosulfuron followed by clodinafop + metsulfuron. Based on overall impact index clodinafop + metsulfuron, pinoxaden + metsulfuron, sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron, pendimethalin fb sulfosulfuron and pendimethalin + metribuzin were recommended for effective weed management in wheat under mid hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide combinations reduced weed count and dry weight compared with sole herbicide applications.

Treatment
herbicide combinationst0
Interactor
weede1weed
Outcome
weed count and dry weighte1
Direction
reducinge1
Comparator
sole application of herbicidese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of herbicide combinations for controlling complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“were superior to sole application of herbicides (pendimethalin 1.25 kg/ha, sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha, metribuzin 210 g/ha and clodinafop 60 g/ha) in reducing weed count and dry weight and increasing plant height, number of tillers, crop dry matter, yield attributes and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide combinations increased plant height and number of tillers compared with sole herbicide applications.

Treatment
herbicide combinationst0
Outcome
plant height, number of tillerse1
Direction
increasinge1
Comparator
sole application of herbicidese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of herbicide combinations for controlling complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“were superior to sole application of herbicides (pendimethalin 1.25 kg/ha, sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha, metribuzin 210 g/ha and clodinafop 60 g/ha) in reducing weed count and dry weight and increasing plant height, number of tillers, crop dry matter, yield attributes and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Herbicide combinations increased crop dry matter, yield attributes and yield compared with sole herbicide applications.

Treatment
herbicide combinationst0
Outcome
crop dry matter, yield attributes and yielde1
Direction
increasinge1
Comparator
sole application of herbicidese1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of herbicide combinations for controlling complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e1

“were superior to sole application of herbicides (pendimethalin 1.25 kg/ha, sulfosulfuron 25 g/ha, metribuzin 210 g/ha and clodinafop 60 g/ha) in reducing weed count and dry weight and increasing plant height, number of tillers, crop dry matter, yield attributes and yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 559–839 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop + metsulfuron gave 28.6% higher grain yield of wheat than hand weeding twice.

Treatment
Clodinafop + metsulfurone2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
28.6e2
Comparator
hand weeding twicee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of herbicide combinations for controlling complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e2

“Clodinafop + metsulfuron, pinoxaden + metsulfuron and pendimethalin fb metsulfuron being better than other combinations gave 28.6, 22.5 and 23.1% higher grain yield of wheat over hand weeding twice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pinoxaden + metsulfuron gave 22.5% higher grain yield of wheat than hand weeding twice.

Treatment
pinoxaden + metsulfurone2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
22.5e2
Comparator
hand weeding twicee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of herbicide combinations for controlling complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e2

“Clodinafop + metsulfuron, pinoxaden + metsulfuron and pendimethalin fb metsulfuron being better than other combinations gave 28.6, 22.5 and 23.1% higher grain yield of wheat over hand weeding twice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1038 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pendimethalin followed by metsulfuron gave 23.1% higher grain yield of wheat than hand weeding twice.

Treatment
pendimethalin fb metsulfurone2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
highere2
Value
23.1%e2
Comparator
hand weeding twicee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of herbicide combinations for controlling complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e2

“Clodinafop + metsulfuron, pinoxaden + metsulfuron and pendimethalin fb metsulfuron being better than other combinations gave 28.6, 22.5 and 23.1% higher grain yield of wheat over hand weeding twice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–1038 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weeds reduced wheat grain yield by 51.9%.

Interactor
Weedse3weed
Outcome
grain yielde3
Direction
reducede3
Value
51.9%e3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of herbicide combinations for controlling complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e3

“Weeds reduced the grain yield by 51.9%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1040–1078 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Each unit increase in weed count per m2 decreased wheat grain yield by 13.3 kg/ha.

Interactor
weede4weed
Outcome
wheat grain yielde4
Direction
decreasede4
Value
13.3 kg/hae4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of herbicide combinations for controlling complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e4

“With unit increase in weed count per m2, the wheat grain yield was decreased by 13.3 kg/ha”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1080–1170 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The cost of weed control under herbicidal treatments was 9.0–28.9% of that under hand weeding, lowest under metribuzin and highest under pendimethalin fb sulfosulfuron.

Treatment
herbicidal treatmentse5
Outcome
cost of weed controle5
Value
9.0–28.9%e5
Qualifier
lowest being under metribuzin and highest under pendimethalin fb sulfosulfurone5
Comparator
hand weedinge5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of herbicide combinations for controlling complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e5

“The cost of weed control under herbicidal treatments was 9.0–28.9% of that under hand weeding lowest being under metribuzin and highest under pendimethalin fb sulfosulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1172–1344 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop + metsulfuron gave the highest net returns from weed control and marginal benefit: cost ratio.

Treatment
Clodinafop + metsulfurone6
Outcome
net returnse6
Qualifier
marginal benefit: cost ratio (MBCR)e6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of herbicide combinations for controlling complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e6

“Clodinafop + metsulfuron gave the highest net returns due to weed control and marginal benefit: cost ratio (MBCR)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1346–1459 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop + metsulfuron gave the highest weed control efficiency, weed control index and crop resistance index.

Treatment
Clodinafop + metsulfurone7
Outcome
weed control efficiency (WCE), weed control index (WCI), crop resistance index (CRI)e7
Qualifier
higheste7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of herbicide combinations for controlling complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e7

“Clodinafop + metsulfuron resulted in highest weed control efficiency (WCE), weed control index (WCI), crop resistance index (CRI), treatment efficiency index, crop intensity index and weed index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1655 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop + metsulfuron gave the highest treatment efficiency index, crop intensity index and weed index.

Treatment
Clodinafop + metsulfurone7
Outcome
treatment efficiency index, crop intensity index and weed indexe7
Qualifier
higheste7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of herbicide combinations for controlling complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e7

“Clodinafop + metsulfuron resulted in highest weed control efficiency (WCE), weed control index (WCI), crop resistance index (CRI), treatment efficiency index, crop intensity index and weed index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1655 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed management index, agronomic management index and integrated weed management index were highest under sulfosulfuron, followed by clodinafop + metsulfuron.

Treatment
sulfosulfurone2
Outcome
Weed management index, agronomic management index and integrated weed management indexe2
Qualifier
higheste2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of herbicide combinations for controlling complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e2

“Weed management index, agronomic management index and integrated weed management index were highest under sulfosulfuron followed by clodinafop + metsulfuron”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1813 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Clodinafop + metsulfuron, pinoxaden + metsulfuron, sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron, pendimethalin fb sulfosulfuron and pendimethalin + metribuzin are recommended for effective weed management in wheat under mid hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh.

Treatment
clodinafop + metsulfurone2
Outcome
effective weed managemente2
Setting
mid hill conditions of Himachal Pradeshe2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Evaluation of herbicide combinations for controlling complex weed flora in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–80 · show in text ↑
e2

“Based on overall impact index clodinafop + metsulfuron, pinoxaden + metsulfuron, sulfosulfuron + metsulfuron, pendimethalin fb sulfosulfuron and pendimethalin + metribuzin were recommended for effective weed management in wheat under mid hill conditions of Himachal Pradesh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1815–2088 · show in text ↑

pinoxaden · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

30 papers: 26 positive, 4 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

pendimethalin · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

66 papers: 57 positive, 9 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

clodinafop · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 57 positive, 3 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 143 positive, 12 negative or no effect

142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.