Paper · 2019

Effect of iron nanoparticles and dry yeast extract on the yield and the productivity of corn (Zea maize L.)

M. R. Al-Shaheen; Mokhald Hadi Asmail; Mohammed R. Al-Shaheen

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
3
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

This work was carried out at the Glass House at the Faculty of Agriculture/ Anbar University in the period between 2016 to 2017 Nano-iron and dry yeast extract were added to evaluate the response of maize productivity. Three concentrations of nano-iron, 0, 50, and 100 mg, were sprayed on the leaves The yeast extract of three concentrations 0, 100 and 150 grams per liter were sprayed on the leaves. The results showed the superiority of the treatments that were sprayed with nanoparticles with the highest rate of chlorophyll, the seed protein ratio and the percentage of seed oil. Significant levels were also recorded when spraying the plants with dry yeast extract. The interactions of 100 mg of nanotube and 150 g / l dry yeast extract characterized by the highest rate of chlorophyll, the oil content in the seeds (%)and the protein rate in the seeds (%)compared to other transactions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher.

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticle spraying gave the highest chlorophyll.

Treatment
sprayed with nanoparticlese0
Outcome
chlorophylle0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed the superiority of the treatments that were sprayed with nanoparticles with the highest rate of chlorophyll, the seed protein ratio and the percentage of seed oil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea maize L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticle spraying gave the highest seed protein ratio.

Treatment
sprayed with nanoparticlese0
Outcome
seed protein ratioe0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed the superiority of the treatments that were sprayed with nanoparticles with the highest rate of chlorophyll, the seed protein ratio and the percentage of seed oil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea maize L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticle spraying gave the highest percentage of seed oil.

Treatment
sprayed with nanoparticlese0
Outcome
percentage of seed oile0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed the superiority of the treatments that were sprayed with nanoparticles with the highest rate of chlorophyll, the seed protein ratio and the percentage of seed oil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 401–583 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea maize L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry yeast extract spraying produced significant responses.

Treatment
dry yeast extracte0
Outcome
Significant levelse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Significant levels were also recorded when spraying the plants with dry yeast extract.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 584–670 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea maize L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment had the highest chlorophyll compared with other treatments.

Treatment
100 mg of nanotube and 150 g / l dry yeast extracte0
Outcome
chlorophylle0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other transactionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interactions of 100 mg of nanotube and 150 g / l dry yeast extract characterized by the highest rate of chlorophyll, the oil content in the seeds (%)and the protein rate in the seeds (%)compared to other transactions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea maize L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment had the highest oil content in the seeds (%) compared with other treatments.

Treatment
100 mg of nanotube and 150 g / l dry yeast extracte0
Outcome
oil content in the seeds (%)e0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other transactionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interactions of 100 mg of nanotube and 150 g / l dry yeast extract characterized by the highest rate of chlorophyll, the oil content in the seeds (%)and the protein rate in the seeds (%)compared to other transactions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea maize L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–107 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment had the highest protein rate in the seeds (%) compared with other treatments.

Treatment
100 mg of nanotube and 150 g / l dry yeast extracte0
Outcome
protein rate in the seeds (%)e0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other transactionse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interactions of 100 mg of nanotube and 150 g / l dry yeast extract characterized by the highest rate of chlorophyll, the oil content in the seeds (%)and the protein rate in the seeds (%)compared to other transactions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 671–892 · show in text ↑
t0

“corn (Zea maize L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–107 · show in text ↑

botanical · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 12 positive, 2 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

botanical · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 18 positive, 8 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

nanoparticle · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 44 positive, 6 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

application · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

62 papers: 61 positive, 1 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

58 papers more in this group

See all 62 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

89 papers: 84 positive, 5 negative or no effect

83 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

85 papers more in this group

See all 89 papers →

botanical · quality: oil · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: oil · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

nanoparticle · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

13 papers: 13 positive, 0 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.