Paper · 2019 · Scientific Reports

Ammonia Volatilization Loss and Corn Nitrogen Nutrition and Productivity with Efficiency Enhanced UAN and Urea under No-tillage

Shuangli Liu; Xiaohui Wang; Xinhua Yin; et al.

15
claims
40
verbatim quotes
55
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Abstract New urease and nitrification inhibitors and polymer coatings were introduced in recent years, but their effects on N loss and plant N nutrition were scarcely examined in agronomic no-tillage production systems. A field experiment of urea treated with efficiency enhancers was conducted on no-tillage corn ( Zea mays L.) in Tennessee, the USA during 2013–2015. A field experiment on urea and ammonium nitrate (UAN) treated with efficiency enhancers was carried out on no-tillage corn in Tennessee in 2014 and 2015. Urea treated with N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) at concentrations of 20% (NBPT 1 ), 26.7% (NBPT 2 ), or 30% (NBPT 3 ) and polymer coated urea (PCU) were effective but maleic-itaconic copolymer treated urea was ineffective in reducing ammonia volatilization loss and improving N nutrition, grain yield, and N agronomic use efficiency of corn compared with untreated urea. Specifically, NBPT 1 , NBPT 2 , or NBPT 3 treated urea and PCU reduced the total ammonia volatilization loss by 29.1–78.8%, 35.4–81.9%, 77.3–87.4%, and 59.1–83.3% during the 20 days after N applications, but increased grain yield by 15.6–31.4%, 12.9–34.8%, 18.7–19.9%, and 14.6–41.1%, respectively. The inhibitory effect of NBPT on ammonia volatilization did not improve with NBPT concentration increased from 20% to 30%. UAN treated with NBPT 3 or a combination of urease and nitrification inhibitors resulted in 16.5–16.6% higher corn yield than untreated UAN only when they were surface applied. In conclusion, when urea-containing fertilizers are surface applied without any incorporation into the soil under no-tillage, their use efficiencies and performances on corn can be enhanced with an effective urease inhibitor in areas and years with noticeable urea N losses.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NBPT 1-treated urea reduces total ammonia volatilization loss by 29.1–78.8% during the 20 days after N application.

Treatment
NBPT 1e1
Outcome
total ammonia volatilization losse1
Direction
reducede1
Value
29.1–78.8%e1
Qualifier
20 days after N applicationse1
Comparator
untreated ureae2
Setting
Tennessee, the USAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment of urea treated with efficiency enhancers was conducted on no-tillage corn ( Zea mays L.) in Tennessee, the USA during 2013–2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–367 · show in text ↑
e1

“NBPT 1 , NBPT 2 , or NBPT 3 treated urea and PCU reduced the total ammonia volatilization loss by 29.1–78.8%, 35.4–81.9%, 77.3–87.4%, and 59.1–83.3% during the 20 days after N applications, but increased grain yield by 15.6–31.4%, 12.9–34.8%, 18.7–19.9%, and 14.6–41.1%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1204 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared with untreated urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NBPT 2-treated urea reduces total ammonia volatilization loss by 35.4–81.9% during the 20 days after N application.

Treatment
NBPT 2e1
Outcome
total ammonia volatilization losse1
Direction
reducede1
Value
35.4–81.9%e1
Qualifier
20 days after N applicationse1
Comparator
untreated ureae2
Setting
Tennessee, the USAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment of urea treated with efficiency enhancers was conducted on no-tillage corn ( Zea mays L.) in Tennessee, the USA during 2013–2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–367 · show in text ↑
e1

“NBPT 1 , NBPT 2 , or NBPT 3 treated urea and PCU reduced the total ammonia volatilization loss by 29.1–78.8%, 35.4–81.9%, 77.3–87.4%, and 59.1–83.3% during the 20 days after N applications, but increased grain yield by 15.6–31.4%, 12.9–34.8%, 18.7–19.9%, and 14.6–41.1%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1204 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared with untreated urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NBPT 3-treated urea reduces total ammonia volatilization loss by 77.3–87.4% during the 20 days after N application.

Treatment
NBPT 3e1
Outcome
total ammonia volatilization losse1
Direction
reducede1
Value
77.3–87.4%e1
Qualifier
20 days after N applicationse1
Comparator
untreated ureae2
Setting
Tennessee, the USAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment of urea treated with efficiency enhancers was conducted on no-tillage corn ( Zea mays L.) in Tennessee, the USA during 2013–2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–367 · show in text ↑
e1

“NBPT 1 , NBPT 2 , or NBPT 3 treated urea and PCU reduced the total ammonia volatilization loss by 29.1–78.8%, 35.4–81.9%, 77.3–87.4%, and 59.1–83.3% during the 20 days after N applications, but increased grain yield by 15.6–31.4%, 12.9–34.8%, 18.7–19.9%, and 14.6–41.1%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1204 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared with untreated urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polymer coated urea reduces total ammonia volatilization loss by 59.1–83.3% during the 20 days after N application.

Treatment
PCUe1
Outcome
total ammonia volatilization losse1
Direction
reducede1
Value
59.1–83.3%e1
Qualifier
20 days after N applicationse1
Comparator
untreated ureae2
Setting
Tennessee, the USAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment of urea treated with efficiency enhancers was conducted on no-tillage corn ( Zea mays L.) in Tennessee, the USA during 2013–2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–367 · show in text ↑
e1

“NBPT 1 , NBPT 2 , or NBPT 3 treated urea and PCU reduced the total ammonia volatilization loss by 29.1–78.8%, 35.4–81.9%, 77.3–87.4%, and 59.1–83.3% during the 20 days after N applications, but increased grain yield by 15.6–31.4%, 12.9–34.8%, 18.7–19.9%, and 14.6–41.1%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1204 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared with untreated urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NBPT 1-treated urea increases corn grain yield by 15.6–31.4%.

Treatment
NBPT 1e1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
15.6–31.4%e1
Comparator
untreated ureae2
Setting
Tennessee, the USAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment of urea treated with efficiency enhancers was conducted on no-tillage corn ( Zea mays L.) in Tennessee, the USA during 2013–2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–367 · show in text ↑
e1

“NBPT 1 , NBPT 2 , or NBPT 3 treated urea and PCU reduced the total ammonia volatilization loss by 29.1–78.8%, 35.4–81.9%, 77.3–87.4%, and 59.1–83.3% during the 20 days after N applications, but increased grain yield by 15.6–31.4%, 12.9–34.8%, 18.7–19.9%, and 14.6–41.1%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1204 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared with untreated urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NBPT 2-treated urea increases corn grain yield by 12.9–34.8%.

Treatment
NBPT 2e1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
12.9–34.8%e1
Comparator
untreated ureae2
Setting
Tennessee, the USAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment of urea treated with efficiency enhancers was conducted on no-tillage corn ( Zea mays L.) in Tennessee, the USA during 2013–2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–367 · show in text ↑
e1

“NBPT 1 , NBPT 2 , or NBPT 3 treated urea and PCU reduced the total ammonia volatilization loss by 29.1–78.8%, 35.4–81.9%, 77.3–87.4%, and 59.1–83.3% during the 20 days after N applications, but increased grain yield by 15.6–31.4%, 12.9–34.8%, 18.7–19.9%, and 14.6–41.1%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1204 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared with untreated urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NBPT 3-treated urea increases corn grain yield by 18.7–19.9%.

Treatment
NBPT 3e1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
18.7–19.9%e1
Comparator
untreated ureae2
Setting
Tennessee, the USAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment of urea treated with efficiency enhancers was conducted on no-tillage corn ( Zea mays L.) in Tennessee, the USA during 2013–2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–367 · show in text ↑
e1

“NBPT 1 , NBPT 2 , or NBPT 3 treated urea and PCU reduced the total ammonia volatilization loss by 29.1–78.8%, 35.4–81.9%, 77.3–87.4%, and 59.1–83.3% during the 20 days after N applications, but increased grain yield by 15.6–31.4%, 12.9–34.8%, 18.7–19.9%, and 14.6–41.1%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1204 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared with untreated urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polymer coated urea increases corn grain yield by 14.6–41.1%.

Treatment
PCUe1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
14.6–41.1%e1
Comparator
untreated ureae2
Setting
Tennessee, the USAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment of urea treated with efficiency enhancers was conducted on no-tillage corn ( Zea mays L.) in Tennessee, the USA during 2013–2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–367 · show in text ↑
e1

“NBPT 1 , NBPT 2 , or NBPT 3 treated urea and PCU reduced the total ammonia volatilization loss by 29.1–78.8%, 35.4–81.9%, 77.3–87.4%, and 59.1–83.3% during the 20 days after N applications, but increased grain yield by 15.6–31.4%, 12.9–34.8%, 18.7–19.9%, and 14.6–41.1%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1204 · show in text ↑
e2

“compared with untreated urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Maleic-itaconic copolymer treated urea is ineffective in reducing ammonia volatilization loss.

Treatment
maleic-itaconic copolymer treated ureae3
Outcome
ammonia volatilization losse3
Direction
ineffectivee3
Comparator
untreated ureae3
Setting
Tennessee, the USAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment of urea treated with efficiency enhancers was conducted on no-tillage corn ( Zea mays L.) in Tennessee, the USA during 2013–2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–367 · show in text ↑
e3

“maleic-itaconic copolymer treated urea was ineffective in reducing ammonia volatilization loss and improving N nutrition, grain yield, and N agronomic use efficiency of corn compared with untreated urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NBPT-treated urea improves N nutrition, grain yield and N agronomic use efficiency of corn.

Treatment
Urea treated with N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT)e4
Outcome
N nutrition, grain yield, and N agronomic use efficiencye3
Direction
effectivee4
Comparator
untreated ureae3
Setting
Tennessee, the USAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment of urea treated with efficiency enhancers was conducted on no-tillage corn ( Zea mays L.) in Tennessee, the USA during 2013–2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–367 · show in text ↑
e4

“Urea treated with N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) at concentrations of 20% (NBPT 1 ), 26.7% (NBPT 2 ), or 30% (NBPT 3 ) and polymer coated urea (PCU) were effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–698 · show in text ↑
e3

“maleic-itaconic copolymer treated urea was ineffective in reducing ammonia volatilization loss and improving N nutrition, grain yield, and N agronomic use efficiency of corn compared with untreated urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Polymer coated urea improves N nutrition, grain yield and N agronomic use efficiency of corn.

Treatment
polymer coated urea (PCU)e4
Outcome
N nutrition, grain yield, and N agronomic use efficiencye3
Direction
effectivee4
Comparator
untreated ureae3
Setting
Tennessee, the USAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment of urea treated with efficiency enhancers was conducted on no-tillage corn ( Zea mays L.) in Tennessee, the USA during 2013–2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–367 · show in text ↑
e4

“Urea treated with N-(n-butyl) thiophosphoric triamide (NBPT) at concentrations of 20% (NBPT 1 ), 26.7% (NBPT 2 ), or 30% (NBPT 3 ) and polymer coated urea (PCU) were effective”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–698 · show in text ↑
e3

“maleic-itaconic copolymer treated urea was ineffective in reducing ammonia volatilization loss and improving N nutrition, grain yield, and N agronomic use efficiency of corn compared with untreated urea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 703–905 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing NBPT from 20% to 30% does not improve its inhibitory effect on ammonia volatilization.

Treatment
NBPT concentration increased from 20% to 30%e5
Outcome
inhibitory effect of NBPT on ammonia volatilizatione5
Direction
did not improvee5
Comparator
20%e5
Setting
Tennessee, the USAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment of urea treated with efficiency enhancers was conducted on no-tillage corn ( Zea mays L.) in Tennessee, the USA during 2013–2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–367 · show in text ↑
e5

“The inhibitory effect of NBPT on ammonia volatilization did not improve with NBPT concentration increased from 20% to 30%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1206–1327 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UAN treated with NBPT 3 yields 16.5–16.6% more corn than untreated UAN, only when surface applied.

Treatment
UAN treated with NBPT 3e6
Outcome
corn yielde6
Direction
highere6
Value
16.5–16.6%e6
Qualifier
only when they were surface appliede6
Comparator
untreated UANe6
Setting
Tennessee, the USAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment of urea treated with efficiency enhancers was conducted on no-tillage corn ( Zea mays L.) in Tennessee, the USA during 2013–2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–367 · show in text ↑
e6

“UAN treated with NBPT 3 or a combination of urease and nitrification inhibitors resulted in 16.5–16.6% higher corn yield than untreated UAN only when they were surface applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1504 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UAN treated with a combination of urease and nitrification inhibitors yields 16.5–16.6% more corn than untreated UAN, only when surface applied.

Treatment
a combination of urease and nitrification inhibitorse6
Outcome
corn yielde6
Direction
highere6
Value
16.5–16.6%e6
Qualifier
only when they were surface appliede6
Comparator
untreated UANe6
Setting
Tennessee, the USAe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment of urea treated with efficiency enhancers was conducted on no-tillage corn ( Zea mays L.) in Tennessee, the USA during 2013–2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–367 · show in text ↑
e6

“UAN treated with NBPT 3 or a combination of urease and nitrification inhibitors resulted in 16.5–16.6% higher corn yield than untreated UAN only when they were surface applied”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1329–1504 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Under no-tillage with surface-applied urea fertilizers, an effective urease inhibitor can enhance use efficiency and performance on corn where urea N losses are noticeable.

Treatment
effective urease inhibitore7
Outcome
use efficiencies and performances on corne7
Qualifier
in areas and years with noticeable urea N lossese7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays subsp. mays
Zea mays subsp. mays · TaxonDominicus Johannes Bergsma · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A field experiment of urea treated with efficiency enhancers was conducted on no-tillage corn ( Zea mays L.) in Tennessee, the USA during 2013–2015”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 220–367 · show in text ↑
e7

“when urea-containing fertilizers are surface applied without any incorporation into the soil under no-tillage, their use efficiencies and performances on corn can be enhanced with an effective urease inhibitor in areas and years with noticeable urea N losses”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1521–1779 · show in text ↑

ammonium nitrate · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

23 papers: 20 positive, 3 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

19 papers more in this group

See all 23 papers →

nitrification inhibitor · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 31 positive, 9 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

butyl group · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

triamide · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

nitrogen · environment: emissions · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 45 positive, 21 negative or no effect

44 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

2,185 papers: 1,906 positive, 279 negative or no effect

1,905 papers in the same direction as this paper · 234 in the opposite direction · 45 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

2,181 papers more in this group

See all 2,185 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.