Paper · 2014 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

HYDROGEN PEROXIDE AS A PRIMING AGENT FOR ALLEVIATING SOIL SALINITY STRESS ON WHEAT (Triticum aestivum) SEEDLINGS.

Amal H. Mahmoud

18
claims
36
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

This work investigated the potential of two concentrations of H2O2 (0.10 and 0.20 mM) applied through irrigation water, as a priming factor, in reducing the detrimental effects of soil salinity stress on wheat (Triticum aestivum L.). Two wheat genotypes, Gemaiza 9 (G9) as a moderately salt sensitive and Sakha 93 (S93) as a salt tolerant, were grown in pots containing a saline clay soil (ECe of 7.35 dS/m) under greenhouse conditions for 45 days. The obtained results showed that H2O2 application at 0.10 and 0.20 mM stimulated the germination of G9 genotype by 10 and 20%, respectively. Both fresh and dry shoot weights of G9 had increased by 9.92 and 7.70 and 8.52 and 8.2% for 0.1 and 0.2 mM H2O2 treated plants, respectively, as compared to control treatment. In contrast, In S93 genotype, negative effects on germination and fresh and dry weight were recorded. The irrigation with 0.1mM H2O2-treated water markedly increased the tillers to about 100% and 22.2% in G9 and S93, respectively, while 0.2mM H2O2 treatment increased the tillers number to 28.6% more in G9 and decreased it 16.7% in S93. Addition of 0.2 mM H2O2 had a negative effect on chlorophyll A content in both cultivars. In G9, chlorophyll B and carotene content were promoted particularly by 0.2mM H2O2. Significant decreases in Na+ content in both cultivars were observed with H2O2 application while potassium was not markedly affected. The K+/Na+ ratio of G9 was lower than that in S93 in all treatments and tended to increase in both genotypes with H2O2 applications. It can be conducted that application of H2O2 as a physiological priming factor may play a significant role in growth improvement of moderately salt sensitive wheat genotypes such as G9 through promotion of Chlorophyll B synthesis and reduction of Na+ content.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 at 0.10 mM stimulated germination of G9 by 10%.

Material
G9e1
Treatment
H2O2 application at 0.10 and 0.20 mMe1
Outcome
germinatione1
Direction
stimulatede1
Value
10e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“H2O2 application at 0.10 and 0.20 mM stimulated the germination of G9 genotype by 10 and 20%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 at 0.20 mM stimulated germination of G9 by 20%.

Material
G9e1
Treatment
H2O2 application at 0.10 and 0.20 mMe1
Outcome
germinatione1
Direction
stimulatede1
Value
20%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“H2O2 application at 0.10 and 0.20 mM stimulated the germination of G9 genotype by 10 and 20%, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 482–588 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 at 0.1 mM increased fresh shoot weight of G9 by 9.92% compared with control.

Material
G9e1
Treatment
0.1 and 0.2 mM H2O2 treated plantse1
Outcome
shoot weightse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
9.92e1
Qualifier
freshe1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both fresh and dry shoot weights of G9 had increased by 9.92 and 7.70 and 8.52 and 8.2% for 0.1 and 0.2 mM H2O2 treated plants, respectively, as compared to control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 at 0.1 mM increased dry shoot weight of G9 by 7.70% compared with control.

Material
G9e1
Treatment
0.1 and 0.2 mM H2O2 treated plantse1
Outcome
shoot weightse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
7.70e1
Qualifier
drye1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both fresh and dry shoot weights of G9 had increased by 9.92 and 7.70 and 8.52 and 8.2% for 0.1 and 0.2 mM H2O2 treated plants, respectively, as compared to control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 at 0.2 mM increased fresh shoot weight of G9 by 8.52% compared with control.

Material
G9e1
Treatment
0.1 and 0.2 mM H2O2 treated plantse1
Outcome
shoot weightse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
8.52e1
Qualifier
freshe1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both fresh and dry shoot weights of G9 had increased by 9.92 and 7.70 and 8.52 and 8.2% for 0.1 and 0.2 mM H2O2 treated plants, respectively, as compared to control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 at 0.2 mM increased dry shoot weight of G9 by 8.2% compared with control.

Material
G9e1
Treatment
0.1 and 0.2 mM H2O2 treated plantse1
Outcome
shoot weightse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
8.2%e1
Qualifier
drye1
Comparator
control treatmente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Both fresh and dry shoot weights of G9 had increased by 9.92 and 7.70 and 8.52 and 8.2% for 0.1 and 0.2 mM H2O2 treated plants, respectively, as compared to control treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 590–764 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation with 0.1 mM H2O2-treated water increased tiller number of G9 by about 100%.

Material
G9e1
Treatment
irrigation with 0.1mM H2O2-treated watere1
Outcome
tillerse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
100%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“The irrigation with 0.1mM H2O2-treated water markedly increased the tillers to about 100% and 22.2% in G9 and S93, respectively, while 0.2mM H2O2 treatment increased the tillers number to 28.6% more in G9 and decreased it 16.7% in S93”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation with 0.1 mM H2O2-treated water increased tiller number of S93 by 22.2%.

Material
S93e1
Treatment
irrigation with 0.1mM H2O2-treated watere1
Outcome
tillerse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
22.2%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“The irrigation with 0.1mM H2O2-treated water markedly increased the tillers to about 100% and 22.2% in G9 and S93, respectively, while 0.2mM H2O2 treatment increased the tillers number to 28.6% more in G9 and decreased it 16.7% in S93”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 at 0.2 mM increased tiller number of G9 by 28.6%.

Material
G9e1
Treatment
0.2mM H2O2 treatmente1
Outcome
tillerse1
Direction
increasede1
Value
28.6%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“The irrigation with 0.1mM H2O2-treated water markedly increased the tillers to about 100% and 22.2% in G9 and S93, respectively, while 0.2mM H2O2 treatment increased the tillers number to 28.6% more in G9 and decreased it 16.7% in S93”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1102 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 at 0.2 mM decreased tiller number of S93 by 16.7%.

Material
S93e1
Treatment
0.2mM H2O2 treatmente1
Outcome
tillerse1
Direction
decreasede1
Value
16.7%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“The irrigation with 0.1mM H2O2-treated water markedly increased the tillers to about 100% and 22.2% in G9 and S93, respectively, while 0.2mM H2O2 treatment increased the tillers number to 28.6% more in G9 and decreased it 16.7% in S93”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 868–1102 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In S93, germination and fresh and dry weight showed negative effects under the H2O2 treatments.

Material
S93e1
Outcome
germination and fresh and dry weighte1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“In contrast, In S93 genotype, negative effects on germination and fresh and dry weight were recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 766–866 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Addition of 0.2 mM H2O2 decreased chlorophyll A content in both wheat cultivars.

Treatment
Addition of 0.2 mM H2O2e1
Outcome
chlorophyll A contente1
Direction
decreaseinferrede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Addition of 0.2 mM H2O2 had a negative effect on chlorophyll A content in both cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1104–1192 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In G9, 0.2 mM H2O2 promoted chlorophyll B and carotene content.

Material
G9e1
Treatment
0.2mM H2O2e1
Outcome
chlorophyll B and carotene contente1
Direction
promotede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“In G9, chlorophyll B and carotene content were promoted particularly by 0.2mM H2O2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1276 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 application decreased Na+ content in both wheat cultivars.

Treatment
H2O2 applicatione1
Outcome
Na+ contente1
Direction
decreasese1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significant decreases in Na+ content in both cultivars were observed with H2O2 application while potassium was not markedly affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1410 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 application did not markedly affect potassium content in either wheat cultivar.

Treatment
H2O2 applicatione1
Outcome
potassiume1
Direction
not markedly affectede1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“Significant decreases in Na+ content in both cultivars were observed with H2O2 application while potassium was not markedly affected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1278–1410 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The K+/Na+ ratio of G9 was lower than that of S93 in all treatments.

Material
G9e1
Outcome
K+/Na+ ratioe1
Direction
lowere1
Qualifier
in all treatmentse1
Comparator
S93e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“The K+/Na+ ratio of G9 was lower than that in S93 in all treatments and tended to increase in both genotypes with H2O2 applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 applications tended to increase the K+/Na+ ratio in both genotypes.

Treatment
H2O2 applicationse1
Outcome
K+/Na+ ratioe1
Direction
tended to increasee1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“The K+/Na+ ratio of G9 was lower than that in S93 in all treatments and tended to increase in both genotypes with H2O2 applications”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1412–1543 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

H2O2 priming may improve growth of moderately salt-sensitive wheat such as G9 through promotion of chlorophyll B synthesis and reduction of Na+ content.

Material
G9e1
Treatment
application of H2O2 as a physiological priming factore1
Outcome
growth improvemente1
Qualifier
through promotion of Chlorophyll B synthesis and reduction of Na+ contente1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“WHEAT (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–102 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of H2O2 as a physiological priming factor may play a significant role in growth improvement of moderately salt sensitive wheat genotypes such as G9 through promotion of Chlorophyll B synthesis and reduction of Na+ content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1570–1803 · show in text ↑

hydrogen peroxide · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

21 papers: 16 positive, 5 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

hydrogen peroxide · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

hydrogen peroxide · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

hydrogen peroxide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 10 positive, 2 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

hydrogen peroxide · physiology: ion balance · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

797 papers in the same direction as this paper · 184 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.