Paper · 2014 · Journal of Plant Production

COMPLEMENTED EFFECT OF GLYCINE BETAINEA AND BIOFERTILIZERS ON GROWTH AND PRODUTIVITY OF SWEET PEPPER (Capsicum annuum L.) PLANT UNDER HIGH TEMPERATURE CONDITION.

H. Abou-Aly; M. Mady

11
claims
21
verbatim quotes
3
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Temperature is one of the major factors are being controlling and/or limiting growth and development of plants. The effect of plant growth promoting rhizobacteria (PGPR) (mixture of Azospirillum lipoferum, Paenibacillus polymyxa and Bacillus circulans), mycorrhizae (AM) and foliar application with glycine betaine (GB) at 0, 10 &15mmol/L individually or in combination on some growth aspects, photosynthetic pigments, microbial activities, minerals and some bioconstituents, endogenous phytohormones, flowering, fruiting and fruit quality of sweet pepper cv. California wander was studies during 2011 and 2012 seasons under open field at high temperature condition. Results indicated that, different applied treatments significantly increased most growth parameters as number of branches and leaves per plant, leaf area per plant, leaves and shoot dry weight per plant and leaf area ratio as well. Furthermore, photosynthetic pigments, NPK, total sugars and total free amino acids concentration in leaves recoded the maximum values when plants treated with PGPR, AM and foliar application with GB at 10 mmol/L as compared with those of individual application or untreated ones. Moreover, individual application with PGPR, AM and / or GB at 10 mmol/L enhanced the microbial activities in rhizosphere of the pepper plants compared with untreated ones. Also, biofertilizers and GB treatments increased auxin, gibberellin and cytokinin levels in sweet pepper shoots at 65 days after transplanting during 2012 season whereas abscisic acid was decreased. Moreover, the highest early and total yield were obtained when plants were sprayed with GB at 10 mmol/L and treated with microbial consortium (PGPR & AM). In addition, chemical composition of minerals and some bioconstituents such as total carbohydrates, vitamin C, total soluble solids in sweet pepper fruits were also increased at the same treatments. Hence, it could be recommended that foliar application with GB at 10 mmol/L in the presence of PGPR and AM as biofertilizers can be used to increase yield and fruit quality of sweet pepper plant when grown at high temperature condition.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied PGPR, mycorrhiza and glycine betaine treatments significantly increased the number of branches, number of leaves and leaf area per plant of sweet pepper.

Taxon
SWEET PEPPERCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
different applied treatmentse0
Outcome
number of branches and leaves per plant, leaf area per plante0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SWEET PEPPER (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“different applied treatments significantly increased most growth parameters as number of branches and leaves per plant, leaf area per plant, leaves and shoot dry weight per plant and leaf area ratio as well”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–897 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Applied treatments significantly increased leaf and shoot dry weight per plant and leaf area ratio of sweet pepper.

Taxon
SWEET PEPPERCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
different applied treatmentse0
Outcome
leaves and shoot dry weight per plant and leaf area ratioe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SWEET PEPPER (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“different applied treatments significantly increased most growth parameters as number of branches and leaves per plant, leaf area per plant, leaves and shoot dry weight per plant and leaf area ratio as well”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 691–897 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf photosynthetic pigments and NPK concentrations of sweet pepper were highest when plants were treated with PGPR, AM and foliar GB at 10 mmol/L, compared with individual application or untreated plants.

Taxon
SWEET PEPPERCapsicum annuumt0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
PGPR, AM and foliar application with GB at 10 mmol/Le0
Outcome
photosynthetic pigments, NPKe0
Direction
maximum valuese0
Comparator
individual application or untreated onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SWEET PEPPER (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“photosynthetic pigments, NPK, total sugars and total free amino acids concentration in leaves recoded the maximum values when plants treated with PGPR, AM and foliar application with GB at 10 mmol/L as compared with those of individual application or untreated ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf total sugars and total free amino acids concentrations of sweet pepper were highest when plants were treated with PGPR, AM and foliar GB at 10 mmol/L, compared with individual application or untreated plants.

Taxon
SWEET PEPPERCapsicum annuumt0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
PGPR, AM and foliar application with GB at 10 mmol/Le0
Outcome
total sugars and total free amino acids concentratione0
Direction
maximum valuese0
Comparator
individual application or untreated onese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SWEET PEPPER (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“photosynthetic pigments, NPK, total sugars and total free amino acids concentration in leaves recoded the maximum values when plants treated with PGPR, AM and foliar application with GB at 10 mmol/L as compared with those of individual application or untreated ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 912–1177 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Individual application of PGPR, AM and/or GB at 10 mmol/L enhanced microbial activities in the rhizosphere of pepper plants compared with untreated plants.

Taxon
pepper plantse0
Treatment
individual application with PGPR, AM and / or GB at 10 mmol/Le0
Outcome
microbial activities in rhizospheree0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
untreated onese0

Verbatim

e0

“individual application with PGPR, AM and / or GB at 10 mmol/L enhanced the microbial activities in rhizosphere of the pepper plants compared with untreated ones”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1349 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer and GB treatments increased auxin, gibberellin and cytokinin levels in sweet pepper shoots at 65 days after transplanting in the 2012 season.

Taxon
SWEET PEPPERCapsicum annuumt0
Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
biofertilizers and GB treatmentse0
Outcome
auxin, gibberellin and cytokinin levelse0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
at 65 days after transplanting during 2012 seasone0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SWEET PEPPER (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“biofertilizers and GB treatments increased auxin, gibberellin and cytokinin levels in sweet pepper shoots at 65 days after transplanting during 2012 season whereas abscisic acid was decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer and GB treatments decreased abscisic acid in sweet pepper shoots.

Taxon
SWEET PEPPERCapsicum annuumt0
Organ / stage
shootse0
Treatment
biofertilizers and GB treatmentse0
Outcome
abscisic acide0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SWEET PEPPER (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“biofertilizers and GB treatments increased auxin, gibberellin and cytokinin levels in sweet pepper shoots at 65 days after transplanting during 2012 season whereas abscisic acid was decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1357–1548 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest early and total yield of sweet pepper were obtained when plants were sprayed with GB at 10 mmol/L and treated with the PGPR and AM microbial consortium.

Taxon
SWEET PEPPERCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
sprayed with GB at 10 mmol/L and treated with microbial consortium (PGPR & AM)e0
Outcome
early and total yielde0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SWEET PEPPER (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest early and total yield were obtained when plants were sprayed with GB at 10 mmol/L and treated with microbial consortium (PGPR & AM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1560–1703 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit total carbohydrates, vitamin C and total soluble solids of sweet pepper increased under the same treatments.

Taxon
SWEET PEPPERCapsicum annuumt0
Organ / stage
fruitse0
Treatment
same treatmentse0
Outcome
total carbohydrates, vitamin C, total soluble solidse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SWEET PEPPER (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“chemical composition of minerals and some bioconstituents such as total carbohydrates, vitamin C, total soluble solids in sweet pepper fruits were also increased at the same treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1718–1902 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit mineral composition of sweet pepper increased under the same treatments.

Taxon
SWEET PEPPERCapsicum annuumt0
Organ / stage
fruitse0
Treatment
same treatmentse0
Outcome
chemical composition of mineralse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SWEET PEPPER (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“chemical composition of minerals and some bioconstituents such as total carbohydrates, vitamin C, total soluble solids in sweet pepper fruits were also increased at the same treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1718–1902 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend foliar GB at 10 mmol/L together with PGPR and AM biofertilizers to increase yield and fruit quality of sweet pepper grown at high temperature.

Taxon
SWEET PEPPERCapsicum annuumt0
Treatment
foliar application with GB at 10 mmol/L in the presence of PGPR and AM as biofertilizerse0
Outcome
yield and fruit qualitye0
Qualifier
when grown at high temperature conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Capsicum annuum
Capsicum annuum · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“SWEET PEPPER (Capsicum annuum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–121 · show in text ↑
e0

“foliar application with GB at 10 mmol/L in the presence of PGPR and AM as biofertilizers can be used to increase yield and fruit quality of sweet pepper plant when grown at high temperature condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1940–2139 · show in text ↑

glycine betaine · physiology: photosynthesis · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

glycine betaine · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results differ

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

inoculation · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Results differ

37 papers: 34 positive, 3 negative or no effect

33 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

mycorrhiza · quality: sugar starch · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · physiology: hormones · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

inoculation · physiology: photosynthesis · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

8 papers: 7 positive, 1 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

application · yield · Capsicum annuum (sweet pepper)Positive and negative results

66 papers: 61 positive, 5 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.