Paper · 2019 · Plant Soil and Environment

Salt acclimation induced salt tolerance in wild-type and abscisic acid-deficient mutant barley

Zhiyu Zuo; Junhong Guo; Caiyun Xin; et al.

14
claims
28
verbatim quotes
9
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Salt acclimation is a process to enhance salt tolerance in plants. The salt acclimation induced salt tolerance was investigated in a spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) cv. Steptoe (wild type, WT) and its abscisic acid (ABA)-deficient mutant Az34. Endogenesis ABA concentration in leaf was significantly increased by salt stress in WT, while it was not affected in Az34. Under salt stress, the salt acclimated Az34 plants had 14.8% lower total soluble sugar concentration and 93.7% higher sodium (Na) concentration in leaf, compared with salt acclimated WT plants. The acclimated plants had significantly higher leaf water potential and osmotic potential than non-acclimated plants in both WT and Az34 under salt stress. The salt acclimation enhanced the net photosynthetic rate (by 22.9% and 12.3%) and the maximum quantum yield of PS II (22.7% and 22.0%) in WT and Az34 under salt stress. However, the stomatal conductance in salt acclimated Az34 plants was 28.9% lower than WT under salt stress. Besides, the guard cell pair width was significantly higher in salt acclimated Az34 plants than that in WT plants. The results indicated that the salt acclimated WT plants showed a higher salt tolerance than Az34 plants, suggesting that ABA deficiency has a negative effect on the salt acclimation induced salt tolerance in barley.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress significantly increased leaf ABA in WT.

Material
WTe0
Treatment
salt stresse0
Outcome
ABA concentration in leafe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Endogenesis ABA concentration in leaf was significantly increased by salt stress in WT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–333 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt stress did not affect leaf ABA in Az34.

Material
Az34e0
Treatment
salt stresse1
Outcome
ABA concentration in leafe1
Direction
not affectede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while it was not affected in Az34.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 335–369 · show in text ↑
e1

“Endogenesis ABA concentration in leaf was significantly increased by salt stress in WT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 247–333 · show in text ↑
e2

“spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–167 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under salt stress, acclimated Az34 had 14.8% less leaf total soluble sugar than acclimated WT.

Material
Az34e0
Organ / stage
leafe0
Treatment
salt acclimatede0
Outcome
total soluble sugar concentratione0
Direction
lowere0
Value
14.8%e0
Qualifier
Under salt stresse0
Comparator
salt acclimated WT plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under salt stress, the salt acclimated Az34 plants had 14.8% lower total soluble sugar concentration and 93.7% higher sodium (Na) concentration in leaf, compared with salt acclimated WT plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–563 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–167 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under salt stress, acclimated Az34 had 93.7% more leaf sodium than acclimated WT.

Material
Az34e0
Treatment
salt acclimatede0
Outcome
sodium (Na) concentration in leafe0
Direction
highere0
Value
93.7%e0
Comparator
salt acclimated WT plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under salt stress, the salt acclimated Az34 plants had 14.8% lower total soluble sugar concentration and 93.7% higher sodium (Na) concentration in leaf, compared with salt acclimated WT plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 370–563 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Acclimated WT had significantly higher leaf water and osmotic potentials than non-acclimated WT under salt stress.

Material
WTe0
Treatment
acclimated plantse0
Outcome
leaf water potential and osmotic potentiale0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
under salt stresse0
Comparator
non-acclimated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The acclimated plants had significantly higher leaf water potential and osmotic potential than non-acclimated plants in both WT and Az34 under salt stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–719 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Acclimated Az34 had significantly higher leaf water and osmotic potentials than non-acclimated Az34 under salt stress.

Material
Az34e0
Treatment
acclimated plantse0
Outcome
leaf water potential and osmotic potentiale0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
under salt stresse0
Comparator
non-acclimated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The acclimated plants had significantly higher leaf water potential and osmotic potential than non-acclimated plants in both WT and Az34 under salt stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 564–719 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt acclimation increased net photosynthetic rate 22.9% in WT under salt stress.

Material
WTe0
Treatment
salt acclimatione0
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
22.9%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The salt acclimation enhanced the net photosynthetic rate (by 22.9% and 12.3%) and the maximum quantum yield of PS II (22.7% and 22.0%) in WT and Az34 under salt stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–889 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt acclimation increased net photosynthetic rate 12.3% in Az34 under salt stress.

Material
Az34e0
Treatment
salt acclimatione0
Outcome
net photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
12.3%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The salt acclimation enhanced the net photosynthetic rate (by 22.9% and 12.3%) and the maximum quantum yield of PS II (22.7% and 22.0%) in WT and Az34 under salt stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–889 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt acclimation increased maximum PS II quantum yield 22.7% in WT.

Material
WTe0
Treatment
salt acclimatione0
Outcome
maximum quantum yield of PS IIe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
22.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The salt acclimation enhanced the net photosynthetic rate (by 22.9% and 12.3%) and the maximum quantum yield of PS II (22.7% and 22.0%) in WT and Az34 under salt stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–889 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–167 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salt acclimation increased maximum PS II quantum yield 22.0% in Az34.

Material
Az34e0
Treatment
salt acclimatione0
Outcome
maximum quantum yield of PS IIe0
Direction
enhancede0
Value
22.0%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The salt acclimation enhanced the net photosynthetic rate (by 22.9% and 12.3%) and the maximum quantum yield of PS II (22.7% and 22.0%) in WT and Az34 under salt stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–889 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–167 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acclimated Az34 stomatal conductance was 28.9% lower than WT under salt stress.

Material
Az34e0
Outcome
stomatal conductancee0
Direction
lowere0
Value
28.9%e0
Qualifier
under salt stresse0
Comparator
WTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the stomatal conductance in salt acclimated Az34 plants was 28.9% lower than WT under salt stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–997 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–167 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Acclimated Az34 had significantly greater guard cell pair width than WT.

Material
Az34e0
Outcome
guard cell pair widthe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
WT plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the guard cell pair width was significantly higher in salt acclimated Az34 plants than that in WT plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1007–1112 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–167 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Acclimated WT showed higher salt tolerance than acclimated Az34.

Material
WTe0
Outcome
salt tolerancee0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Az34 plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the salt acclimated WT plants showed a higher salt tolerance than Az34 plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1140–1217 · show in text ↑
e1

“spring barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 133–167 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Authors infer that ABA deficiency negatively affects salt-acclimation-induced tolerance.

Outcome
salt acclimation induced salt tolerancee0
Direction
negative effecte0
Qualifier
ABA deficiencye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“suggesting that ABA deficiency has a negative effect on the salt acclimation induced salt tolerance in barley.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1329 · show in text ↑

salinity · physiology: hormones · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 1 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
See all 4 papers →

salinity · physiology: photosynthesis · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 3 positive, 22 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.