Paper · 2020 · UKnowledge (University of Kentucky)

Improving Kentucky's Winter Wheat and Double Crop Soybean Rotation

Rod, Katherine

13
claims
30
verbatim quotes
1
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · other-oa

Abstract

The winter wheat double crop soybean rotation is an economically viable rotation for Kentucky farmers. Recent decreases in commodity prices has warranted the need to evaluate intensive management practices that can increase yields and profitability in this crop rotation. There were three goals of this dissertation: 1.) identify management practices that would decrease deoxynivalenol (DON) in harvested wheat grain and increase wheat heading and anthesis uniformity, 2.) evaluate double crop soybean planting timing and identify intensive management practices to increase seed yield, and 3.) determine the profitability of these management options. These studies were conducted in Princeton KY between 2016 and 2019. In-furrow phosphorus did not decrease DON or heading and anthesis uniformity. Increased seeding rate decreased the number of days to beginning anthesis (Zadoks 60) in late planted wheat, however did not decrease DON contamination. Harvesting wheat at 20 to 22% grain moisture increased grain quality, but also increased DON contamination compared to harvesting at 13 to 15% grain moisture. Harvesting at 20 to 22% grain moisture, enabled an earlier planting timing of double crop soybeans which resulted in soybean yield increase. Increased seeding rate and the use of prophylactic R3 foliar pesticide application increased double crop soybean yields respectively. The use of seed treatment did not increase seed yield. Partial budget analysis indicate that the wheat intensive management treatments had negative net benefits, and that only the increased seeding rate and the use of prophylactic foliar pesticide application had positive net benefits. Overall, intensive management options were identified that increase yield and profitability for Kentucky’s winter wheat and double crop soybean rotation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed other-oa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

In-furrow phosphorus did not decrease DON or heading and anthesis uniformity in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
In-furrow phosphoruse1
Outcome
DON or heading and anthesis uniformitye1
Direction
did not decreasee1
Setting
Princeton KYe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“In-furrow phosphorus did not decrease DON or heading and anthesis uniformity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–795 · show in text ↑
e2

“The winter wheat double crop soybean rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e3

“These studies were conducted in Princeton KY between 2016 and 2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased seeding rate decreased the number of days to beginning anthesis (Zadoks 60) in late planted wheat.

Treatment
Increased seeding ratee1
Outcome
number of days to beginning anthesis (Zadoks 60)e1
Direction
decreasede1
Qualifier
late plantede1
Setting
Princeton KYe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Increased seeding rate decreased the number of days to beginning anthesis (Zadoks 60) in late planted wheat, however did not decrease DON contamination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–948 · show in text ↑
e3

“These studies were conducted in Princeton KY between 2016 and 2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased seeding rate did not decrease DON contamination in wheat.

Treatment
Increased seeding ratee1
Outcome
DON contaminatione1
Direction
did not decreasee1
Setting
Princeton KYe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Increased seeding rate decreased the number of days to beginning anthesis (Zadoks 60) in late planted wheat, however did not decrease DON contamination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 797–948 · show in text ↑
e3

“These studies were conducted in Princeton KY between 2016 and 2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting wheat at 20 to 22% grain moisture increased grain quality compared with harvesting at 13 to 15% grain moisture.

Treatment
Harvesting wheat at 20 to 22% grain moisturee1
Outcome
grain qualitye1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
harvesting at 13 to 15% grain moisturee1
Setting
Princeton KYe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Harvesting wheat at 20 to 22% grain moisture increased grain quality, but also increased DON contamination compared to harvesting at 13 to 15% grain moisture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1107 · show in text ↑
e3

“These studies were conducted in Princeton KY between 2016 and 2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting wheat at 20 to 22% grain moisture increased DON contamination compared with harvesting at 13 to 15% grain moisture.

Treatment
Harvesting wheat at 20 to 22% grain moisturee1
Outcome
DON contaminatione1
Direction
increasede1
Comparator
harvesting at 13 to 15% grain moisturee1
Setting
Princeton KYe3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Harvesting wheat at 20 to 22% grain moisture increased grain quality, but also increased DON contamination compared to harvesting at 13 to 15% grain moisture”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 950–1107 · show in text ↑
e3

“These studies were conducted in Princeton KY between 2016 and 2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting at 20 to 22% grain moisture enabled an earlier planting timing of double crop soybeans.

Taxon
soybeansGlycine maxe1
Treatment
Harvesting at 20 to 22% grain moisturee1
Outcome
planting timinge1
Direction
earliere1
Setting
Princeton KYe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Harvesting at 20 to 22% grain moisture, enabled an earlier planting timing of double crop soybeans which resulted in soybean yield increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1248 · show in text ↑
e3

“These studies were conducted in Princeton KY between 2016 and 2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Harvesting at 20 to 22% grain moisture was followed by a soybean yield increase.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe1
Treatment
Harvesting at 20 to 22% grain moisturee1
Outcome
soybean yielde1
Direction
increasee1
Setting
Princeton KYe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Harvesting at 20 to 22% grain moisture, enabled an earlier planting timing of double crop soybeans which resulted in soybean yield increase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1109–1248 · show in text ↑
e3

“These studies were conducted in Princeton KY between 2016 and 2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased seeding rate increased double crop soybean yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe4
Treatment
Increased seeding ratee4
Outcome
double crop soybean yieldse4
Direction
increasede4
Setting
Princeton KYe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Increased seeding rate and the use of prophylactic R3 foliar pesticide application increased double crop soybean yields respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1382 · show in text ↑
e3

“These studies were conducted in Princeton KY between 2016 and 2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prophylactic R3 foliar pesticide application increased double crop soybean yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe4
Treatment
prophylactic R3 foliar pesticide applicatione4
Outcome
double crop soybean yieldse4
Direction
increasede4
Setting
Princeton KYe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“Increased seeding rate and the use of prophylactic R3 foliar pesticide application increased double crop soybean yields respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1250–1382 · show in text ↑
e3

“These studies were conducted in Princeton KY between 2016 and 2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The use of seed treatment did not increase soybean seed yield.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxe6
Treatment
seed treatmente5
Outcome
seed yielde5
Direction
did not increasee5
Setting
Princeton KYe3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“The use of seed treatment did not increase seed yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1384–1437 · show in text ↑
e6

“evaluate double crop soybean planting timing”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 473–517 · show in text ↑
e3

“These studies were conducted in Princeton KY between 2016 and 2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat intensive management treatments had negative net benefits.

Treatment
wheat intensive management treatmentse1
Outcome
net benefitse1
Setting
Princeton KYe2

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Partial budget analysis indicate that the wheat intensive management treatments had negative net benefits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1439–1544 · show in text ↑
e2

“These studies were conducted in Princeton KY between 2016 and 2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased seeding rate had positive net benefits in the wheat and soybean rotation.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
increased seeding ratee1
Outcome
net benefitse1
Setting
Princeton KYe3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“only the increased seeding rate and the use of prophylactic foliar pesticide application had positive net benefits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1669 · show in text ↑
e2

“The winter wheat double crop soybean rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e3

“These studies were conducted in Princeton KY between 2016 and 2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–717 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Prophylactic foliar pesticide application had positive net benefits in the wheat and soybean rotation.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume2
Treatment
prophylactic foliar pesticide applicatione1
Outcome
net benefitse1
Setting
Princeton KYe3

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“only the increased seeding rate and the use of prophylactic foliar pesticide application had positive net benefits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1555–1669 · show in text ↑
e2

“The winter wheat double crop soybean rotation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–45 · show in text ↑
e3

“These studies were conducted in Princeton KY between 2016 and 2019”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 651–717 · show in text ↑

insecticide · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Results differ

68 papers: 39 positive, 29 negative or no effect

38 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

64 papers more in this group

See all 68 papers →

insecticide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

69 papers: 51 positive, 18 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 69 papers →

phosphorus · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 10 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

density · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 10 positive, 10 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

168 papers: 137 positive, 31 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 137 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

164 papers more in this group

See all 168 papers →

density · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

305 papers: 207 positive, 98 negative or no effect

206 papers in the same direction as this paper · 94 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

301 papers more in this group

See all 305 papers →

application · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

404 papers: 332 positive, 72 negative or no effect

331 papers in the same direction as this paper · 66 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

400 papers more in this group

See all 404 papers →

density · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

498 papers: 376 positive, 122 negative or no effect

375 papers in the same direction as this paper · 115 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

494 papers more in this group

See all 498 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.