Paper · 2020 · Applied Ecology and Environmental Research

THE EFFECT OF SILICON FOLIAR AND ROOT APPLICATION ON GROWTH, PHYSIOLOGY, AND ANTIOXIDANT ENZYME ACTIVITY OF WHEAT PLANTS UNDER CADMIUM TOXICITY

SH. UR RAHMAN; X. QI; Z. ZHANG; et al.

9
claims
15
verbatim quotes
14
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Silicon (Si) application can boost plant growth and physiology under heavy metal toxicity. The article aimed to investigate how the foliar and root application of silicon (Si) affects the uptake, translocation, and concentration of cadmium (Cd) for winter wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), and in turn the plant's growth, physiology, and antioxidant enzyme activity, using a complete randomized block design (CRBD)? For this purpose, we used twelve treatments consisting of two levels of Si (0 and 3 mM Na2SiO3) against four levels of Cd (0, 50, 100, and 200 M CdCl2) with three replications. Results showed that all levels of Cd significantly enhanced membrane permeability measured as malonyldialdehyde (MDA) content, osmotic stress measured as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content, and triggered the enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant system, resulting in a severe reduction in the growth of wheat seedlings. Besides, Si application either as root (SiR3) or foliar spray (SiF3) remarkably encountered Cd toxicity by furth er improving antioxidative enzymes activities, and by hindering Cd uptake, but more significant results were recorded for SiR3. Therefore, it might be established that Si root supplementation inhibited Cd translocation from root to shoot more effectively than foliar application, thereby lowering the potential health risk of Cd pollution.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All cadmium levels significantly increased membrane permeability measured by MDA content and osmotic stress measured by hydrogen peroxide content.

Treatment
all levels of Cde0
Outcome
membrane permeability measured as malonyldialdehyde (MDA) content, osmotic stress measured as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) contente0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that all levels of Cd significantly enhanced membrane permeability measured as malonyldialdehyde (MDA) content, osmotic stress measured as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content, and triggered the enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant system, resulting in a severe reduction in the growth of wheat seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–908 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium triggered the enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant system.

Treatment
all levels of Cde0
Outcome
enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant systeme0
Direction
triggerede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that all levels of Cd significantly enhanced membrane permeability measured as malonyldialdehyde (MDA) content, osmotic stress measured as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content, and triggered the enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant system, resulting in a severe reduction in the growth of wheat seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–908 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cadmium severely reduced wheat seedling growth.

Treatment
all levels of Cde0
Outcome
growth of wheat seedlingse0
Direction
reductione0
Qualifier
severee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results showed that all levels of Cd significantly enhanced membrane permeability measured as malonyldialdehyde (MDA) content, osmotic stress measured as hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) content, and triggered the enzymatic and non-enzymatic antioxidant system, resulting in a severe reduction in the growth of wheat seedlings.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–908 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root silicon application countered cadmium toxicity by improving antioxidative enzyme activity and hindering cadmium uptake.

Treatment
root (SiR3)e0
Outcome
antioxidative enzymes activitiese0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Besides, Si application either as root (SiR3) or foliar spray (SiF3) remarkably encountered Cd toxicity by furth er improving antioxidative enzymes activities, and by hindering Cd uptake, but more significant results were recorded for SiR3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root silicon hindered cadmium uptake.

Treatment
root (SiR3)e0
Outcome
Cd uptakee0
Direction
hinderinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Besides, Si application either as root (SiR3) or foliar spray (SiF3) remarkably encountered Cd toxicity by furth er improving antioxidative enzymes activities, and by hindering Cd uptake, but more significant results were recorded for SiR3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar silicon improved antioxidative enzyme activity under cadmium toxicity.

Treatment
foliar spray (SiF3)e0
Outcome
antioxidative enzymes activitiese0
Direction
improvinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Besides, Si application either as root (SiR3) or foliar spray (SiF3) remarkably encountered Cd toxicity by furth er improving antioxidative enzymes activities, and by hindering Cd uptake, but more significant results were recorded for SiR3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar silicon hindered cadmium uptake.

Treatment
foliar spray (SiF3)e0
Outcome
Cd uptakee0
Direction
hinderinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Besides, Si application either as root (SiR3) or foliar spray (SiF3) remarkably encountered Cd toxicity by furth er improving antioxidative enzymes activities, and by hindering Cd uptake, but more significant results were recorded for SiR3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root silicon gave more significant results than foliar silicon.

Treatment
SiR3e0
Outcome
more significant resultse0
Direction
more significante0
Comparator
foliar spray (SiF3)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Besides, Si application either as root (SiR3) or foliar spray (SiF3) remarkably encountered Cd toxicity by furth er improving antioxidative enzymes activities, and by hindering Cd uptake, but more significant results were recorded for SiR3.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–1149 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that root silicon inhibited root-to-shoot cadmium translocation more effectively than foliar application.

Treatment
Si root supplementatione0
Outcome
Cd translocation from root to shoote0
Direction
inhibitede0
Qualifier
might be establishede0
Comparator
foliar applicatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Therefore, it might be established that Si root supplementation inhibited Cd translocation from root to shoot more effectively than foliar application, thereby lowering the potential health risk of Cd pollution.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1361 · show in text ↑
t0

“WHEAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–113 · show in text ↑

cadmium atom · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

47 papers: 4 positive, 43 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

43 papers more in this group

See all 47 papers →

cadmium atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

110 papers: 20 positive, 90 negative or no effect

89 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

106 papers more in this group

See all 110 papers →

silicon atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 58 positive, 3 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

application · physiology: enzyme activity · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 15 positive, 1 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.