Paper · 2020 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Effect of sulphur and FYM on yield content and uptake of nutrient by wheat

Nidhi Nagar; Vipin Kumar; Devendra Pal; et al.

Read at the source ↗doi:10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i4aa.9989 ↗OpenAlex W3047113838 ↗In the paper network →

5
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at agricultural research farm of R.B.S. college, Bichpuri, Agra during the rabi season of 2018-2019 to study the response of wheat to sulphur and FYM. The plant height enhanced significantly with increasing doses of FYM and sulphur. The grain also increased by supplying higher doses of FYM and sulphur. The soil application of FYM and sulphur improved the contents and uptake values of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulphur by wheat crop. Better production of wheat crop could be achieved by adopting treatment combination as 40 kg S ha-1 with FYM @10 t ha-1..

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing FYM and sulphur doses significantly increased wheat plant height.

Treatment
increasing doses of FYM and sulphure0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The plant height enhanced significantly with increasing doses of FYM and sulphur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 184–264 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher FYM and sulphur doses increased wheat grain.

Treatment
higher doses of FYM and sulphure0
Outcome
graine0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The grain also increased by supplying higher doses of FYM and sulphur”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–335 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–74 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM and sulphur soil application improved wheat nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulphur contents.

Treatment
soil application of FYM and sulphure0
Outcome
contentse0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil application of FYM and sulphur improved the contents and uptake values of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulphur by wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–477 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM and sulphur soil application improved wheat nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulphur uptake.

Treatment
soil application of FYM and sulphure0
Outcome
uptake values of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulphure0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil application of FYM and sulphur improved the contents and uptake values of nitrogen, phosphorus, potassium and sulphur by wheat crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–477 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 40 kg S ha-1 with FYM @10 t ha-1 for better wheat production.

Treatment
40 kg S ha-1 with FYM @10 t ha-1e0
Outcome
Better production of wheat crope0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Better production of wheat crop could be achieved by adopting treatment combination as 40 kg S ha-1 with FYM @10 t ha-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 479–598 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

66 papers: 51 positive, 15 negative or no effect

50 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Other sulfur-containing sodium salts did not alleviate aluminum stress.

    Hydrogen Sulfide Alleviates Aluminum Toxicity in Germinating Wheat Seedlings · 2010

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Increasing sulphur addition significantly decreased wheat-grain selenium at one field site.

    Evidence of low selenium concentrations in UK bread‐making wheat grain · 2002

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    S deficiency did not significantly affect grain N and S content.

    Co-ordinated expression of amino acid metabolism in response to N and S deficiency during wheat grain filling · 2008

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

62 papers more in this group

See all 66 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

148 papers: 124 positive, 24 negative or no effect

123 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Sulfur application yielded hardly any benefit.

    Landscape positions dictating crop fertilizer responses in wheat-based farming systems of East African Highlands · 2020

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Sulphur fertiliser had little effect on grain yield or grain nitrogen and sulphur concentration and uptake.

    Management of nitrogen and sulphur fertiliser for improved bread wheat ( Triticum aestivum ) quality · 2001

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Sulfur rate, source and timing did not affect yield on soils with SOM above 20 g kg −1.

    Do Hard Red Spring Wheat Varieties Vary in Their Response to Sulfur? · 2019

    Opposite direction

144 papers more in this group

See all 148 papers →

sulfur atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

33 papers: 31 positive, 2 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    Sulphur dusting did not prevent kernel smudge in maturing crops.

    The "BLACK-POINT" OR "KERNEL SMUDGE" DISEASE OF CEREALS · 1938

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Radiation use efficiency was conservative with sulphur fertilization.

    Productivity of wheat/faba bean intercropping systems in response to sulphur fertilization and seed rate under contrasting management conditions · 2012

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
    Bioactive sulfur coated urea at 130 kg N ha -1 significantly increased wheat leaf area index to 5.67.

    Slow-release nitrogen fertilizers enhance growth, yield, NUE in wheat crop and reduce nitrogen losses under an arid environment · 2021

    Same direction

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Foliar application led to less than 1% of fertilizer nitrogen absorbed into wheat grain.

    EFFECTS OF FOLIAR- AND SOIL-APPLIED NITROGEN AND SOIL NITRATE-NITROGEN LEVEL ON THE PROTEIN CONTENT OF NEEPAWA WHEAT · 1972

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Foliar P addition did not downregulate root P uptake in wheat (isotopic dilution test of the substitution hypothesis)

    Assessment of foliar-applied phosphorus fertiliser formulations to enhance phosphorus nutrition and grain production in wheat · 2020

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Zn concentration in wheat was not changed when plants were sprayed at early stem elongation.

    Effects of foliar application of zinc sulfate at different phenological stages on yield formation and grain zinc content of bread wheat (cv. Kohdasht) · 2014

    Opposite direction

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

fertilization · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

755 papers: 663 positive, 92 negative or no effect

662 papers in the same direction as this paper · 89 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Reducing fertilizer by 25% did not reduce soil nutrient availability or wheat nutrient content, height and dry weight.

    Beneficial bacteria activate nutrients and promote wheat growth under conditions of reduced fertilizer application · 2020

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Gibberellic acid reduced root dry weight of wheat, unless applied to the shoots in a lanolin paste.

    The plant‐growth‐promoting properties of gibberellic acid, a metabolic product of the fungus gibberella fujikuroi · 1954

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    fertilizer N rate had no effect on main stem development rate.

    Estimation of Spring Wheat Leaf Growth Rates and Anthesis from Air Temperature1 · 1984

    Opposite direction

751 papers more in this group

See all 755 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Nitrogen fertilization increased exchangeable Al and Al saturation.

    Soil Acidification from Long-Term Use of Nitrogen Fertilizers on Winter Wheat · 2011

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Chemical fertilizer alone led to lower soil organic matter, water content and total N content.

    Effects of cattle manure compost combined with chemical fertilizer on topsoil organic matter, bulk density and earthworm activity in a wheat–maize rotation system in Eastern China · 2015

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    P fertilizer decreased wheat grain zinc concentration by 33–39%.

    Zinc bioavailability in wheat grain in relation to phosphorus fertiliser, crop sequence and mycorrhizal fungi · 2008

    Opposite direction

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Current high nitrogen practices do not significantly raise crop yields relative to optimum fertilization.

    Reducing environmental risk by improving N management in intensive Chinese agricultural systems · 2009 · compared with knowledge-based optimum N fertilization

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Wheat yield declined by 0.04 Mg ha −1 yr −1 with 75 and 100% N-P-K fertilizer.

    Yield and Soil Nutrient Changes in a Long‐Term Rice‐Wheat Rotation in India · 2002

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    The authors concluded that N fertiliser could not compensate for the yield reduction in canola and wheat due to late sowing.

    Effects of sowing time and nitrogen fertiliser on canola and wheat, and nitrogen fertiliser on Indian mustard. I. Dry matter production, grain yield, and yield components · 2001

    Opposite direction

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.