Paper · 2018 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Effect of tillage practices and nutrient levels on economic, uptake and available nutrient in soybean based cropping systems

SK Nayak; WN Narkhede; SG Jadhav; et al.

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The field investigation was undertaken during kharif and rabi season of 2014-15 and 2015-16 on clayey soil at the farm of AICRP on Integrated Farming Systems, VNMKV, Parbhani. Treatment consists of twelve treatment combinations comprising two tillage practices (minimum tillage, conventional tillage) and two cropping systems (soybean-rabi sorghum,soybean-wheat) in main plot, three levels of nutrients (75, 100 and 125 per cent RDF) in sub plot for soybean in kharif and after that for rabi sorghum and wheat in rabi season were assigned in a split-split plot design. The gross and net monetary returns, B:C ratio and economic efficiency were also found to be higher with practice of conventional tillage and 125 per cent RDF to soybean, rabi sorghum and wheat. Soybean-wheat cropping systems noted higher gross and net monetary returns, B:C ratio and economic efficiency. Also the nutrient uptake by crops was significantly higher in conventional tillage and application 125 per cent RDF treatments. Available nutrient status of the soil after harvest of crop was significantly higher in minimum tillage treatments.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage and 125% RDF increased gross and net returns, benefit-cost ratio and economic efficiency.

Taxon
soybean, rabi sorghum and wheate0
Treatment
conventional tillage and 125 per cent RDFe0
Outcome
gross and net monetary returns, B:C ratio and economic efficiencye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“The gross and net monetary returns, B:C ratio and economic efficiency were also found to be higher with practice of conventional tillage and 125 per cent RDF to soybean, rabi sorghum and wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 569–761 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The soybean-wheat system had higher gross and net returns, benefit-cost ratio and economic efficiency.

Taxon
Soybean-wheate0
Treatment
Soybean-wheat cropping systemse0
Outcome
gross and net monetary returns, B:C ratio and economic efficiencye0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Soybean-wheat cropping systems noted higher gross and net monetary returns, B:C ratio and economic efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 763–872 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage significantly increased crop nutrient uptake.

Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
nutrient uptake by cropse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the nutrient uptake by crops was significantly higher in conventional tillage and application 125 per cent RDF treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1000 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Application of 125% RDF significantly increased crop nutrient uptake.

Treatment
application 125 per cent RDFe0
Outcome
nutrient uptake by cropse0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“the nutrient uptake by crops was significantly higher in conventional tillage and application 125 per cent RDF treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1000 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Minimum tillage left significantly higher available soil nutrients after harvest.

Treatment
minimum tillage treatmentse0
Outcome
Available nutrient status of the soile0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Available nutrient status of the soil after harvest of crop was significantly higher in minimum tillage treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1116 · show in text ↑

tillage · yield · SorghumResults differ

123 papers: 102 positive, 21 negative or no effect

101 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

119 papers more in this group

See all 123 papers →

tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

390 papers: 264 positive, 126 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

386 papers more in this group

See all 390 papers →

fertilization · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

446 papers: 418 positive, 28 negative or no effect

417 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

442 papers more in this group

See all 446 papers →

fertilization · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

1,192 papers: 1,021 positive, 171 negative or no effect

1,020 papers in the same direction as this paper · 155 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

1,188 papers more in this group

See all 1,192 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.