Paper · 2018 · International Journal of Chemical Studies

Studies on the effect of zinc, iron, and FYM on growth, yield and quality improvement in timely sown wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties

Girish Goyal; VK Verma; Ram Pyare; et al.

10
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

An experiments on “Studies on the effect of Zinc, Iron, and FYM on growth, yield and quality improvement in timely sown wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) varieties”. was conducted during Rabi seasons of 2015-16 and 2016-17 at Students’ Instructional Farm of Chandra Shekhar Azad University of Agriculture and Technology, Kanpur, Uttar Pradesh, India, situated at 125.9 meter altitude, 26.41480 North latitude, 80.23210 East longitude. The experiment consisted three varieties (PBW 550, DBW 17 and K 402), two FYM levels (FYM @10 t ha-1 and without FYM) and three nutrient management treatments (NPK- 150:60:40 kg ha-1 only, NPK+ ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 as basal + FeSO4 1% sprayed at tillering stage, NPK + ZnSO4 @ 25 kg ha-1 as basal + FeSo4 1% sprayed at flag leaf stage). The treatments were accommodated in Split-Split Plot Design with three replications. The soil of experimental field was sandy loam in texture having low organic carbon (0.36 %), medium in available Nitrogen (174 kg ha-1) low in available Phosphorus (14.0 kg ha-1), medium in available Potassium (154.0 kg ha-1), low in available Zinc (0.68 mg ha-1) and normal in available Iron (8.42 mg ha-1) with normal PH (7.92). Pooled results of two years experimentation indicated that highest value of grain yield (5017.6 kg ha-1), grain zinc concentration (41.70 ppm) and grain Iron concentration (48.82 ppm) was recorded under the variety K 402. Application of FYM @10 t ha-1 + NPK (150: 60: 40 kg ha-1) recorded maximum grain yield (4678.51 kg ha-1), grain zinc concentration (41.21 ppm) and grain iron concentration (47.15 ppm), compared to without FYM treatment. Application of NPK @ (150:60:40 kg ha-1 + ZnSO4 @25 kg ha-1 as basal + FeSO4 1% sprayed at tillering stage recorded highest grain yield (4805.69 kg ha-1), grain zinc concentration (42.03 ppm) and grain iron concentration (47.88 ppm) and compared to other nutrient management treatments. The interaction effect of varieties, FYM levels, and nutrient management treatments were found non-significant.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K 402 had the highest grain yield at 5017.6 kg ha-1.

Material
K 402e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5017.6 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pooled results of two years experimentation indicated that highest value of grain yield (5017.6 kg ha-1), grain zinc concentration (41.70 ppm) and grain Iron concentration (48.82 ppm) was recorded under the variety K 402.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K 402 had the highest grain zinc concentration at 41.70 ppm.

Material
K 402e0
Outcome
grain zinc concentratione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
41.70 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pooled results of two years experimentation indicated that highest value of grain yield (5017.6 kg ha-1), grain zinc concentration (41.70 ppm) and grain Iron concentration (48.82 ppm) was recorded under the variety K 402.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

K 402 had the highest grain Iron concentration at 48.82 ppm.

Material
K 402e0
Outcome
grain Iron concentratione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
48.82 ppme0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Pooled results of two years experimentation indicated that highest value of grain yield (5017.6 kg ha-1), grain zinc concentration (41.70 ppm) and grain Iron concentration (48.82 ppm) was recorded under the variety K 402.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1181–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM plus NPK gave maximum grain yield relative to no FYM.

Treatment
FYM @10 t ha-1 + NPK (150: 60: 40 kg ha-1)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0
Value
4678.51 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
without FYM treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of FYM @10 t ha-1 + NPK (150: 60: 40 kg ha-1) recorded maximum grain yield (4678.51 kg ha-1), grain zinc concentration (41.21 ppm) and grain iron concentration (47.15 ppm), compared to without FYM treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1622 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM plus NPK gave maximum grain zinc concentration relative to no FYM.

Treatment
FYM @10 t ha-1 + NPK (150: 60: 40 kg ha-1)e0
Outcome
grain zinc concentratione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
41.21 ppme0
Comparator
without FYM treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of FYM @10 t ha-1 + NPK (150: 60: 40 kg ha-1) recorded maximum grain yield (4678.51 kg ha-1), grain zinc concentration (41.21 ppm) and grain iron concentration (47.15 ppm), compared to without FYM treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1622 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM plus NPK gave maximum grain iron concentration relative to no FYM.

Treatment
FYM @10 t ha-1 + NPK (150: 60: 40 kg ha-1)e0
Outcome
grain iron concentratione0
Direction
maximume0
Value
47.15 ppme0
Comparator
without FYM treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of FYM @10 t ha-1 + NPK (150: 60: 40 kg ha-1) recorded maximum grain yield (4678.51 kg ha-1), grain zinc concentration (41.21 ppm) and grain iron concentration (47.15 ppm), compared to without FYM treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1403–1622 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal ZnSO4 and tillering FeSO4 with NPK gave highest grain yield.

Treatment
NPK @ (150:60:40 kg ha-1 + ZnSO4 @25 kg ha-1 as basal + FeSO4 1% sprayed at tillering stagee0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
4805.69 kg ha-1e0
Comparator
other nutrient management treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of NPK @ (150:60:40 kg ha-1 + ZnSO4 @25 kg ha-1 as basal + FeSO4 1% sprayed at tillering stage recorded highest grain yield (4805.69 kg ha-1), grain zinc concentration (42.03 ppm) and grain iron concentration (47.88 ppm) and compared to other nutrient management treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1623–1909 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal ZnSO4 and tillering FeSO4 with NPK gave highest grain zinc concentration.

Treatment
NPK @ (150:60:40 kg ha-1 + ZnSO4 @25 kg ha-1 as basal + FeSO4 1% sprayed at tillering stagee0
Outcome
grain zinc concentratione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
42.03 ppme0
Comparator
other nutrient management treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of NPK @ (150:60:40 kg ha-1 + ZnSO4 @25 kg ha-1 as basal + FeSO4 1% sprayed at tillering stage recorded highest grain yield (4805.69 kg ha-1), grain zinc concentration (42.03 ppm) and grain iron concentration (47.88 ppm) and compared to other nutrient management treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1623–1909 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Basal ZnSO4 and tillering FeSO4 with NPK gave highest grain iron concentration.

Treatment
NPK @ (150:60:40 kg ha-1 + ZnSO4 @25 kg ha-1 as basal + FeSO4 1% sprayed at tillering stagee0
Outcome
grain iron concentratione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
47.88 ppme0
Comparator
other nutrient management treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of NPK @ (150:60:40 kg ha-1 + ZnSO4 @25 kg ha-1 as basal + FeSO4 1% sprayed at tillering stage recorded highest grain yield (4805.69 kg ha-1), grain zinc concentration (42.03 ppm) and grain iron concentration (47.88 ppm) and compared to other nutrient management treatments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1623–1909 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The interaction of variety, FYM and nutrient management was not significant.

Material
varietiese0
Treatment
FYM levels, and nutrient management treatmentse0
Outcome
interaction effecte0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The interaction effect of varieties, FYM levels, and nutrient management treatments were found non-significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1910–2021 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–106 · show in text ↑

zinc sulfate · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

100 papers: 98 positive, 2 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 100 papers →

zinc sulfate · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

39 papers: 37 positive, 2 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

5 papers: 5 positive, 0 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

iron(2+) sulfate (anhydrous) · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

tillage · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

145 papers: 119 positive, 26 negative or no effect

118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 24 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

141 papers more in this group

See all 145 papers →

application · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

275 papers: 257 positive, 18 negative or no effect

256 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

271 papers more in this group

See all 275 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.