Paper · 2021 · Journal of Crop production and processing

Evaluation of Quantitative and Qualitative Traits of Chickpea as Affected by Biofertilizer, Nitrogen, and Humic Acid in Dryland Condition

Malaki, A.; Khalesro, Sh.; Heidari, Gh. R.

8
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

In order to evaluate biofertilizer, nitrogen and humic acid effect on quantitative and qualitative traits of chickpea (ILC 482 line) this research was carried out at the Agricultural Research Field of Kurdistan University, Sannadaj, Iran. A factorial experiment was conducted based on a randomized complete block design with three replications. Experimental treatments included three levels of leaf foliar application of humic acid (control (0), 2, and 4 per thousand), two levels of nitrogen fertilizer (control (0), and 30 kg/ha) and two levels of biofertilizer (non-inoculation and inoculation). Results indicated that the greatest pods/plant, seed weight/plant and 100 seed weight were belonged to the second level of humic acid. The maximum grain yield (271.5 g/m2) and biological yield (684.31 g/m2) were obtained from 2 per thousand concentration of the humic acid application. The greatest grain potassium concentration (1297.56 mg/kg) was belonged to the second level of humic acid. Nitrogen and biofertilizer applications significantly increased the grain yield, seed weight/plant and harvest index. Maximum percentage of seed protein (22.91) was obtained from integrated treatment of biofertilizer and nitrogen. From the gathered data it appears that humic acid and biofertilizer applications integrated with nitrogen fertilizer may improve seed yield and quality of chickpea.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The second level of humic acid gave the greatest pods per plant, seed weight per plant and 100-seed weight in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
ILC 482e0
Treatment
second level of humic acide1
Outcome
pods/plant, seed weight/plant and 100 seed weighte1
Direction
greateste1
Setting
Agricultural Research Field of Kurdistan University, Sannadaj, Irane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (ILC 482 line) this research was carried out at the Agricultural Research Field of Kurdistan University, Sannadaj, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–237 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results indicated that the greatest pods/plant, seed weight/plant and 100 seed weight were belonged to the second level of humic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 599–732 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2 per thousand humic acid application gave the maximum grain yield, 271.5 g/m2, in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
ILC 482e0
Treatment
2 per thousand concentration of the humic acid applicatione2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
maximume2
Value
271.5 g/m2e2
Setting
Agricultural Research Field of Kurdistan University, Sannadaj, Irane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (ILC 482 line) this research was carried out at the Agricultural Research Field of Kurdistan University, Sannadaj, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–237 · show in text ↑
e2

“The maximum grain yield (271.5 g/m2) and biological yield (684.31 g/m2) were obtained from 2 per thousand concentration of the humic acid application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 2 per thousand humic acid application gave the maximum biological yield, 684.31 g/m2, in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
ILC 482e0
Treatment
2 per thousand concentration of the humic acid applicatione2
Outcome
biological yielde2
Direction
maximume2
Value
684.31 g/m2e2
Setting
Agricultural Research Field of Kurdistan University, Sannadaj, Irane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (ILC 482 line) this research was carried out at the Agricultural Research Field of Kurdistan University, Sannadaj, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–237 · show in text ↑
e2

“The maximum grain yield (271.5 g/m2) and biological yield (684.31 g/m2) were obtained from 2 per thousand concentration of the humic acid application”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 734–883 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The second level of humic acid gave the greatest grain potassium concentration, 1297.56 mg/kg, in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
ILC 482e0
Treatment
second level of humic acide3
Outcome
grain potassium concentratione3
Direction
greateste3
Value
1297.56 mg/kge3
Setting
Agricultural Research Field of Kurdistan University, Sannadaj, Irane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (ILC 482 line) this research was carried out at the Agricultural Research Field of Kurdistan University, Sannadaj, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–237 · show in text ↑
e3

“The greatest grain potassium concentration (1297.56 mg/kg) was belonged to the second level of humic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 885–990 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fertilizer significantly increased grain yield, seed weight per plant and harvest index of chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
ILC 482e0
Treatment
Nitrogene4
Outcome
grain yield, seed weight/plant and harvest indexe4
Direction
increasede4
Setting
Agricultural Research Field of Kurdistan University, Sannadaj, Irane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (ILC 482 line) this research was carried out at the Agricultural Research Field of Kurdistan University, Sannadaj, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–237 · show in text ↑
e4

“Nitrogen and biofertilizer applications significantly increased the grain yield, seed weight/plant and harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilizer application significantly increased grain yield, seed weight per plant and harvest index of chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
ILC 482e0
Treatment
biofertilizer applicationse4
Outcome
grain yield, seed weight/plant and harvest indexe4
Direction
increasede4
Setting
Agricultural Research Field of Kurdistan University, Sannadaj, Irane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (ILC 482 line) this research was carried out at the Agricultural Research Field of Kurdistan University, Sannadaj, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–237 · show in text ↑
e4

“Nitrogen and biofertilizer applications significantly increased the grain yield, seed weight/plant and harvest index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 992–1108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated biofertilizer and nitrogen gave the maximum seed protein percentage, 22.91, in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Material
ILC 482e0
Treatment
integrated treatment of biofertilizer and nitrogene5
Outcome
percentage of seed proteine5
Direction
Maximume5
Value
22.91e5
Setting
Agricultural Research Field of Kurdistan University, Sannadaj, Irane0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (ILC 482 line) this research was carried out at the Agricultural Research Field of Kurdistan University, Sannadaj, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–237 · show in text ↑
e5

“Maximum percentage of seed protein (22.91) was obtained from integrated treatment of biofertilizer and nitrogen”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1221 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Humic acid and biofertilizer applications integrated with nitrogen fertilizer may improve seed yield and quality of chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
humic acid and biofertilizer applications integrated with nitrogen fertilizere6
Outcome
seed yield and qualitye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“chickpea (ILC 482 line) this research was carried out at the Agricultural Research Field of Kurdistan University, Sannadaj, Iran”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 109–237 · show in text ↑
e6

“humic acid and biofertilizer applications integrated with nitrogen fertilizer may improve seed yield and quality of chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1262–1386 · show in text ↑

other · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

28 papers: 27 positive, 1 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

24 papers more in this group

See all 28 papers →

inoculation · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

102 papers: 93 positive, 9 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

213 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

other · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.