Paper · 2021 · Agronomy

Impact of Organic Amendment with Alternate Wetting and Drying Irrigation on Rice Yield, Water Use Efficiency and Physicochemical Properties of Soil

Ahmad Numery Ashfaqul Haque; Md Kamal Uddin; Muhammad Firdaus Sulaiman; et al.

10
claims
19
verbatim quotes
53
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A pot experiment was executed to investigate the impact of biochar and compost with water-saving irrigation on the rice yield, water use efficiency, and physicochemical properties of soil. Two irrigation regimes—namely alternate wetting and drying (AWD) and continuous flooding (CF)—and four types of organic amendments (OA)—namely rice husk biochar (RHB), oil palm empty fruit bunch biochar (EFBB), compost and a control—were applied to evaluate their effects. Under the AWD irrigation regime, the maximum grain was produced by RHB (241.12 g), whereas under the same organic amendments, both AWD and CF produced a similar grain yield. Under the same organic amendment, a significantly higher water use efficiency (WUE) was observed from the AWD irrigation with RHB (6.30 g L−1) and EFBB (5.80 g L−1). Within the same irrigation regime, soil pH, cation exchange capacity, total carbon, total nitrogen and available phosphorus were enhanced due to the incorporation of biochar and compost, while higher soil exchangeable potassium was observed under CF irrigation for all treatments. RHB and EFBB significantly reduced the soil bulk density (up to 20.70%) and increased porosity (up to 16.70%) under both irrigation regimes. The results imply that the use of biochar with AWD irrigation could enhance the nutrient uptake and physicochemical properties of soil and allow rice to produce a greater yield with less water consumption.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Under AWD irrigation, rice husk biochar gave the maximum rice grain yield (241.12 g) in the pot experiment

Treatment
RHBe1
Outcome
graine1
Direction
maximume1
Value
241.12 ge1
Setting
pot experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A pot experiment was executed to investigate the impact of biochar and compost with water-saving irrigation on the rice yield, water use efficiency, and physicochemical properties of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–187 · show in text ↑
e1

“Under the AWD irrigation regime, the maximum grain was produced by RHB (241.12 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 462–543 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD and continuous flooding gave a similar rice grain yield under the same organic amendments

Treatment
AWDe2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
no_changeinferrede2
Comparator
CFe2
Setting
pot experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A pot experiment was executed to investigate the impact of biochar and compost with water-saving irrigation on the rice yield, water use efficiency, and physicochemical properties of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–187 · show in text ↑
e2

“whereas under the same organic amendments, both AWD and CF produced a similar grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 545–634 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD irrigation with rice husk biochar gave significantly higher rice water use efficiency (6.30 g L−1)

Treatment
AWD irrigation with RHBe3
Outcome
water use efficiency (WUE)e3
Direction
highere3
Value
6.30 g L−1e3
Comparator
same organic amendmente3
Setting
pot experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A pot experiment was executed to investigate the impact of biochar and compost with water-saving irrigation on the rice yield, water use efficiency, and physicochemical properties of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–187 · show in text ↑
e3

“Under the same organic amendment, a significantly higher water use efficiency (WUE) was observed from the AWD irrigation with RHB (6.30 g L−1) and EFBB (5.80 g L−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

AWD irrigation with EFBB gave significantly higher rice water use efficiency (5.80 g L−1)

Treatment
EFBBe3
Outcome
water use efficiency (WUE)e3
Direction
highere3
Value
5.80 g L−1e3
Comparator
same organic amendmente3
Setting
pot experimente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A pot experiment was executed to investigate the impact of biochar and compost with water-saving irrigation on the rice yield, water use efficiency, and physicochemical properties of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–187 · show in text ↑
e3

“Under the same organic amendment, a significantly higher water use efficiency (WUE) was observed from the AWD irrigation with RHB (6.30 g L−1) and EFBB (5.80 g L−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 636–800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and compost enhanced soil pH, cation exchange capacity and total carbon

Treatment
biochar and composte4
Outcome
soil pH, cation exchange capacity, total carbone4
Direction
enhancede4
Setting
pot experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A pot experiment was executed to investigate the impact of biochar and compost with water-saving irrigation on the rice yield, water use efficiency, and physicochemical properties of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–187 · show in text ↑
e4

“Within the same irrigation regime, soil pH, cation exchange capacity, total carbon, total nitrogen and available phosphorus were enhanced due to the incorporation of biochar and compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar and compost enhanced soil total nitrogen and available phosphorus

Treatment
biochar and composte4
Outcome
total nitrogen and available phosphoruse4
Direction
enhancede4
Setting
pot experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A pot experiment was executed to investigate the impact of biochar and compost with water-saving irrigation on the rice yield, water use efficiency, and physicochemical properties of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–187 · show in text ↑
e4

“Within the same irrigation regime, soil pH, cation exchange capacity, total carbon, total nitrogen and available phosphorus were enhanced due to the incorporation of biochar and compost”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 802–987 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Continuous flooding gave higher soil exchangeable potassium than AWD irrigation

Treatment
CF irrigatione5
Outcome
soil exchangeable potassiume5
Direction
highere5
Setting
pot experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A pot experiment was executed to investigate the impact of biochar and compost with water-saving irrigation on the rice yield, water use efficiency, and physicochemical properties of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–187 · show in text ↑
e5

“while higher soil exchangeable potassium was observed under CF irrigation for all treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1081 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice husk biochar and oil palm empty fruit bunch biochar reduced soil bulk density by up to 20.70%

Treatment
RHB and EFBBe6
Outcome
soil bulk densitye6
Direction
reducede6
Value
up to 20.70%e6
Setting
pot experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A pot experiment was executed to investigate the impact of biochar and compost with water-saving irrigation on the rice yield, water use efficiency, and physicochemical properties of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–187 · show in text ↑
e6

“RHB and EFBB significantly reduced the soil bulk density (up to 20.70%) and increased porosity (up to 16.70%) under both irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1222 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Rice husk biochar and oil palm empty fruit bunch biochar increased soil porosity by up to 16.70%

Treatment
RHB and EFBBe6
Outcome
porositye6
Direction
increasede6
Value
up to 16.70%e6
Setting
pot experimente0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A pot experiment was executed to investigate the impact of biochar and compost with water-saving irrigation on the rice yield, water use efficiency, and physicochemical properties of soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–187 · show in text ↑
e6

“RHB and EFBB significantly reduced the soil bulk density (up to 20.70%) and increased porosity (up to 16.70%) under both irrigation regimes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1222 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar with AWD irrigation could enhance nutrient uptake and soil properties and allow rice to yield more with less water

Outcome
the use of biochar with AWD irrigatione7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e7

“The results imply that the use of biochar with AWD irrigation could enhance the nutrient uptake and physicochemical properties of soil and allow rice to produce a greater yield with less water consumption”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1428 · show in text ↑

biochar · soil: physics · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

15 papers: 15 positive, 0 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

11 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

biochar · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

46 papers: 44 positive, 2 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

42 papers more in this group

See all 46 papers →

biochar · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 81 positive, 5 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

biochar · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 135 positive, 12 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

305 papers: 280 positive, 25 negative or no effect

279 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

301 papers more in this group

See all 305 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

380 papers: 350 positive, 30 negative or no effect

349 papers in the same direction as this paper · 25 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

376 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

993 papers: 932 positive, 61 negative or no effect

931 papers in the same direction as this paper · 56 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

989 papers more in this group

See all 993 papers →

irrigation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

1,171 papers: 906 positive, 265 negative or no effect

264 papers in the same direction as this paper · 906 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

1,167 papers more in this group

See all 1,171 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.