Paper · 2021 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Synergistic and antagonistic interactions of soil water potential and osmotic potential linked to nitrogen fertilization on spinach traits and water use efficiency

Hamid Ramezanifar; Najme Yazdanpanah; Hamidreza Golkar Hamzee Yazd; et al.

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
4
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Few studies have attempted to investigate the combined effects of soil matric potential (Ψm) and osmotic potential (Ψs) on plant production and water use efficiency (WUE). The purpose of this study is to evaluate the synergistic and antagonistic effects of Ψm and Ψs associated with nitrogen (N) fertilization on spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) growth traits and WUE. Five levels of salinity (1, 4, 7, 9, 11 dS m−1), three levels of water use amounts including deficit-irrigation (W–), full-irrigation (W0) and over-irrigation (W+), and four levels of N application rates (0, 50, 75, and 100% of N requirement) were applied. A new parameter namely "WUEθ" is suggested based on soil water content (θ). Results showed that water deficit combined with high saline irrigation water caused the most reduction in the plant biomass, leaf area index (LAI) and evapotranspiration (ET). The acquired plant yield coefficient (Ky) of 1.003 indicates that the spinach is a moderately salt-sensitive vegetable. The highest WUE was observed under deficit-irrigation and intermediate salinity conditions, which was attributed to an adaptation mechanism in the plant. However, WUEθ (R2 > 0.98) was a better predictor of the plant yield than WUE (R2 > 0.48). Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) decreased with increasing salinity and water deficiency. Also, Ψm and Ψs had a synergistic interaction on yield and ET, while their effect on WUE and WUEθ was antagonistic. Salinity greater than drought reduced yield, while both had equal reducing effects on ET. Furthermore, WUE and WUEθ were more influenced by Ψm than Ψs.Research HighlightsThe new parameter WUEθ is a better predictor of the spinach plant yield than WUE.WUE and WUEθ are more influenced by water potential (Ψm) than osmotic potential (Ψs).Synergistic interaction of Ψm and Ψs on yield and ET, but antagonistic effect on WUE and WUEθ.Salinity greater than drought reduces yield, while both have equal reducing effects on ET.Ψm shows negative effects on yield and ET, but positive effects on WUE and WUEθ.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit combined with high saline irrigation water caused the greatest reductions in plant biomass, LAI and evapotranspiration.

Taxon
spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)Spinacia oleraceae0
Treatment
water deficit combined with high saline irrigation watere1
Outcome
plant biomass, leaf area index (LAI) and evapotranspiration (ET)e1
Direction
most reductione1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) growth traits and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–365 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that water deficit combined with high saline irrigation water caused the most reduction in the plant biomass, leaf area index (LAI) and evapotranspiration (ET)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–874 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The acquired yield coefficient Ky of 1.003 indicates that spinach is moderately salt-sensitive.

Taxon
spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)Spinacia oleraceae0
Outcome
plant yield coefficient (Ky)e2
Value
1.003e2
Qualifier
moderately salt-sensitive vegetablee2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) growth traits and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–365 · show in text ↑
e2

“The acquired plant yield coefficient (Ky) of 1.003 indicates that the spinach is a moderately salt-sensitive vegetable”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 876–994 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest WUE was observed under deficit-irrigation and intermediate salinity conditions.

Taxon
spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)Spinacia oleraceae0
Treatment
deficit-irrigation and intermediate salinity conditionse3
Outcome
WUEe3
Direction
higheste3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) growth traits and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–365 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest WUE was observed under deficit-irrigation and intermediate salinity conditions, which was attributed to an adaptation mechanism in the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1148 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The highest WUE under deficit-irrigation and intermediate salinity was attributed to an adaptation mechanism in spinach.

Taxon
spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)Spinacia oleraceae0
Outcome
WUEe3
Qualifier
an adaptation mechanism in the plante3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) growth traits and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–365 · show in text ↑
e3

“The highest WUE was observed under deficit-irrigation and intermediate salinity conditions, which was attributed to an adaptation mechanism in the plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1148 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WUEθ was a better predictor of spinach yield than WUE.

Taxon
spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)Spinacia oleraceae0
Outcome
predictor of the plant yielde5
Direction
bettere5
Value
R2 > 0.98e5
Qualifier
R2 > 0.48e5
Comparator
WUEe5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) growth traits and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–365 · show in text ↑
e5

“However, WUEθ (R2 > 0.98) was a better predictor of the plant yield than WUE (R2 > 0.48)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1150–1238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen use efficiency decreased with increasing salinity and water deficiency.

Taxon
spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)Spinacia oleraceae0
Treatment
increasing salinity and water deficiencye6
Outcome
Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE)e6
Direction
decreasede6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) growth traits and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–365 · show in text ↑
e6

“Nitrogen use efficiency (NUE) decreased with increasing salinity and water deficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1240–1325 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ψm and Ψs had a synergistic interaction on spinach yield and ET.

Taxon
spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)Spinacia oleraceae0
Treatment
Ψm and Ψse7
Outcome
yield and ETe7
Direction
synergistice7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) growth traits and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–365 · show in text ↑
e7

“Also, Ψm and Ψs had a synergistic interaction on yield and ET, while their effect on WUE and WUEθ was antagonistic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1441 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ψm and Ψs had an antagonistic interaction on WUE and WUEθ.

Taxon
spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)Spinacia oleraceae0
Treatment
Ψm and Ψse7
Outcome
WUE and WUEθe7
Direction
antagonistice7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) growth traits and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–365 · show in text ↑
e7

“Also, Ψm and Ψs had a synergistic interaction on yield and ET, while their effect on WUE and WUEθ was antagonistic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1327–1441 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity reduced spinach yield more than drought.

Taxon
spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)Spinacia oleraceae0
Treatment
Salinitye1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
reducede1
Comparator
droughte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) growth traits and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–365 · show in text ↑
e1

“Salinity greater than drought reduced yield, while both had equal reducing effects on ET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1531 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salinity and drought had equal reducing effects on spinach ET.

Taxon
spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)Spinacia oleraceae0
Treatment
Salinitye1
Outcome
ETe1
Direction
equal reducing effectse1
Comparator
droughte1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) growth traits and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–365 · show in text ↑
e1

“Salinity greater than drought reduced yield, while both had equal reducing effects on ET”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1443–1531 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

WUE and WUEθ were more influenced by Ψm than by Ψs.

Taxon
spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)Spinacia oleraceae0
Treatment
Ψme1
Outcome
WUE and WUEθe1
Direction
more influencede1
Comparator
Ψse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) growth traits and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–365 · show in text ↑
e1

“Furthermore, WUE and WUEθ were more influenced by Ψm than Ψs”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1533–1593 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ψm had negative effects on spinach yield and ET.

Taxon
spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)Spinacia oleraceae0
Treatment
Ψme1
Outcome
yield and ETe1
Direction
negative effectse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) growth traits and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–365 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ψm shows negative effects on yield and ET, but positive effects on WUE and WUEθ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1963–2042 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ψm had positive effects on WUE and WUEθ.

Taxon
spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)Spinacia oleraceae0
Treatment
Ψme1
Outcome
WUE and WUEθe1
Direction
positive effectse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) growth traits and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–365 · show in text ↑
e1

“Ψm shows negative effects on yield and ET, but positive effects on WUE and WUEθ”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1963–2042 · show in text ↑

salinity · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results differ

34 papers: 9 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

irrigation · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 6 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

drought · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 1 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

salinity · nutrient: efficiency · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

salinity · yield · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

5 papers: 0 positive, 5 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

salinity · physiology: water · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.