Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Water deficit combined with high saline irrigation water caused the greatest reductions in plant biomass, LAI and evapotranspiration.

A claim from Synergistic and antagonistic interactions of soil water potential and osmotic potential linked to nitrogen fertilization on spinach traits and water use efficiency · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water deficit combined with high saline irrigation water caused the greatest reductions in plant biomass, LAI and evapotranspiration.

Taxon
spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.)Spinacia oleraceae0
Treatment
water deficit combined with high saline irrigation watere1
Outcome
plant biomass, leaf area index (LAI) and evapotranspiration (ET)e1
Direction
most reductione1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Spinacia oleracea
Spinacia oleracea · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“on spinach (Spinacia oleracea L.) growth traits and WUE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 310–365
e1

“Results showed that water deficit combined with high saline irrigation water caused the most reduction in the plant biomass, leaf area index (LAI) and evapotranspiration (ET)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 700–874

Title

Synergistic and antagonistic interactions of soil water potential and osmotic potential linked to nitrogen fertilization on spinach traits and water use efficiency

Hamid Ramezanifar; Najme Yazdanpanah; Hamidreza Golkar Hamzee Yazd; et al. Journal of Plant Nutrition 2021. doi:10.1080/01904167.2021.1952222

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-6fbc2f04f4e020c9d5e6444ee4766aa8d40d11dafc92da6ce3cade10ed04d00b · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

salinity · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Results differ

34 papers: 9 positive, 25 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

irrigation · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 6 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. negative
  8. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

drought · growth · Spinacia oleracea (spinach)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 1 positive, 12 negative or no effect

11 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

4 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.