Abstract
The study was carried out in the winter (rabi) season to determine effect of Nano and Non-nano nutrient, the study's findings revealed that wheat grown with 100% NPK + nano nutrients (N + P + K + Zn) had significantly higher uptake, namely N (143.1 kg ha-1), P (28.9 kg ha-1), K (109.0 kg ha-1), and Zn (519.5 g ha-1). Applications of nano nutrients—N, P, K, and Zn, and N + P + K + Zn + 75% NPK—worked synergistically and increased content and uptake over 100% NPK. Similarly, the agronomic efficiency (kg of grain kg-1 of nutrient applied) of N (22.4), P (56.0), and K (84.0) was greatest when 75% NPK + nano N + bio nano P, K, and Zn were applied. In a similar manner, physiological efficiency and partial factor productivity were also found to be significantly higher with the same treatment. Thus, the wheat crop grown with the application of Nano-N + 75 and 100 percent NPK led to higher nutrient content, accumulation, and efficiency.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Wheat given 100% NPK plus nano nutrients had significantly higher N uptake of 143.1 kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- 100% NPK + nano nutrients (N + P + K + Zn)e0
- Outcome
- Ne0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 143.1 kg ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“wheat grown with 100% NPK + nano nutrients (N + P + K + Zn) had significantly higher uptake, namely N (143.1 kg ha-1), P (28.9 kg ha-1), K (109.0 kg ha-1), and Zn (519.5 g ha-1).”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment gave higher P uptake of 28.9 kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- 100% NPK + nano nutrients (N + P + K + Zn)e0
- Outcome
- Pe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 28.9 kg ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“wheat grown with 100% NPK + nano nutrients (N + P + K + Zn) had significantly higher uptake, namely N (143.1 kg ha-1), P (28.9 kg ha-1), K (109.0 kg ha-1), and Zn (519.5 g ha-1).”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment gave higher K uptake of 109.0 kg ha-1.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- 100% NPK + nano nutrients (N + P + K + Zn)e0
- Outcome
- Ke0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 109.0 kg ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“wheat grown with 100% NPK + nano nutrients (N + P + K + Zn) had significantly higher uptake, namely N (143.1 kg ha-1), P (28.9 kg ha-1), K (109.0 kg ha-1), and Zn (519.5 g ha-1).”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment gave higher Zn uptake of 519.5 g ha-1.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- 100% NPK + nano nutrients (N + P + K + Zn)e0
- Outcome
- Zne0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 519.5 g ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“wheat grown with 100% NPK + nano nutrients (N + P + K + Zn) had significantly higher uptake, namely N (143.1 kg ha-1), P (28.9 kg ha-1), K (109.0 kg ha-1), and Zn (519.5 g ha-1).”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano N, P, K and Zn increased nutrient content and uptake over 100% NPK.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- nano nutrients—N, P, K, and Zne0
- Outcome
- content and uptakee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- 100% NPKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Applications of nano nutrients—N, P, K, and Zn, and N + P + K + Zn + 75% NPK—worked synergistically and increased content and uptake over 100% NPK.”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Nano N, P, K and Zn with 75% NPK increased content and uptake over 100% NPK.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- N + P + K + Zn + 75% NPKe0
- Outcome
- content and uptakee0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- 100% NPKe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Applications of nano nutrients—N, P, K, and Zn, and N + P + K + Zn + 75% NPK—worked synergistically and increased content and uptake over 100% NPK.”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The 75% NPK plus nano nutrient treatment gave greatest N agronomic efficiency, 22.4.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- 75% NPK + nano N + bio nano P, K, and Zne0
- Outcome
- agronomic efficiency (kg of grain kg-1 of nutrient applied) of Ne0
- Direction
- greateste0
- Value
- 22.4e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the agronomic efficiency (kg of grain kg-1 of nutrient applied) of N (22.4), P (56.0), and K (84.0) was greatest when 75% NPK + nano N + bio nano P, K, and Zn were applied.”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment gave greatest P agronomic efficiency, 56.0.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- 75% NPK + nano N + bio nano P, K, and Zne0
- Outcome
- Pe0
- Direction
- greateste0
- Value
- 56.0e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the agronomic efficiency (kg of grain kg-1 of nutrient applied) of N (22.4), P (56.0), and K (84.0) was greatest when 75% NPK + nano N + bio nano P, K, and Zn were applied.”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment gave greatest K agronomic efficiency, 84.0.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- 75% NPK + nano N + bio nano P, K, and Zne0
- Outcome
- Ke0
- Direction
- greateste0
- Value
- 84.0e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“the agronomic efficiency (kg of grain kg-1 of nutrient applied) of N (22.4), P (56.0), and K (84.0) was greatest when 75% NPK + nano N + bio nano P, K, and Zn were applied.”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The same treatment produced significantly higher physiological efficiency and partial factor productivity.
- Taxon
- Wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- same treatmente0
- Outcome
- physiological efficiency and partial factor productivitye0
- Direction
- highere0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“physiological efficiency and partial factor productivity were also found to be significantly higher with the same treatment.”
t0“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”
The same questions in other papers
zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ
346 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- no effect
376 papers more in this group
See all 380 papers →zinc atom · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree
11 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →potassium · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
8 papers more in this group
See all 12 papers →phosphorus · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →potassium · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
78 papers more in this group
See all 82 papers →nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
100 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- positive
- no effect
- negative
101 papers more in this group
See all 105 papers →fertilization · nutrient: efficiency · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 33 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
172 papers more in this group
See all 176 papers →phosphorus · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
197 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
222 papers more in this group
See all 226 papers →8 of 11 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.