Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Wheat given 100% NPK plus nano nutrients had significantly higher N uptake of 143.1 kg ha-1.

A claim from Effect of Nano and Non-Nano Nutrients on Content, Uptake and NUE of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) · 2023

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wheat given 100% NPK plus nano nutrients had significantly higher N uptake of 143.1 kg ha-1.

Treatment
100% NPK + nano nutrients (N + P + K + Zn)e0
Outcome
Ne0
Direction
highere0
Value
143.1 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“wheat grown with 100% NPK + nano nutrients (N + P + K + Zn) had significantly higher uptake, namely N (143.1 kg ha-1), P (28.9 kg ha-1), K (109.0 kg ha-1), and Zn (519.5 g ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 140–318

Title

Effect of Nano and Non-Nano Nutrients on Content, Uptake and NUE of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Bal Veer Singh; N. S. Rana; Akshay Kumar Kurdekar; et al. International Journal of Environment and Climate Change 2023. doi:10.9734/ijecc/2023/v13i71907

Other claims from this paper (9)

Record rev-43ed2691a998f37ba03b15f958f04aa15d46ff550ff3a8152bb51584bda02b6a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

zinc atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

380 papers: 347 positive, 33 negative or no effect

346 papers in the same direction as this claim · 33 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative
    Zn deficiency increased Imax in Excalibur.

    Kinetic parameters of Zn uptake by wheat are affected by the herbicide chlorsulfuron · 1997

    Opposite directionAbout lacking this nutrient, so it counts the other way round

371 papers more in this group

See all 380 papers →

nanoparticle · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 101 positive, 4 negative or no effect

100 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

96 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

phosphorus · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

226 papers: 198 positive, 28 negative or no effect

197 papers in the same direction as this claim · 28 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

217 papers more in this group

See all 226 papers →

3 of 5 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.