Abstract
A field experiment conducted during 1990-91 to 1992-93 with sugarcane (Sacchnrum officinarum L.) indicated that application.of graded levels of nitrogen along with inoculation of 2cultures increased the cane and sugar yields to the extent of 7.30 and 0.78 m tonsha respectively compared with the uninoculated control. The gemination. tillering, number of millable canes, girth and cane height were also improved due to Azotobacter and Azospirillum culture combination. Maximum response was observed in Azotobncter + Azospirillum culture with nitrogen. There was a saving of fertilizer N to the extent of 25-50 kgha and im- provement in soil properties.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
Graded nitrogen with inoculation of two cultures increased cane yield by 7.30 relative to the uninoculated control.
Verbatim
t0“sugarcane (Saccharum oflcinarum)”
e0“A field experiment conducted during 1990-91 to 1992-93”
e1“application.of graded levels of nitrogen along with inoculation of 2cultures increased the cane and sugar yields to the extent of 7.30 and 0.78 m tonsha respectively compared with the uninoculated control”
Claim · model-written summary
Graded nitrogen with inoculation of two cultures increased sugar yield by 0.78 m tonsha relative to the uninoculated control.
Verbatim
t0“sugarcane (Saccharum oflcinarum)”
e0“A field experiment conducted during 1990-91 to 1992-93”
e1“application.of graded levels of nitrogen along with inoculation of 2cultures increased the cane and sugar yields to the extent of 7.30 and 0.78 m tonsha respectively compared with the uninoculated control”
Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter and Azospirillum culture combination improved germination and tillering of sugarcane.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- Azotobacter and Azospirillum culture combinatione2
- Interactor
- Azotobacter
Azotobactere2symbiont - Second interactor
- Azospirillum
Azospirillume2symbiont - Outcome
- gemination. tilleringe2
- Direction
- improvede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sugarcane (Saccharum oflcinarum)”
e2“The gemination. tillering, number of millable canes, girth and cane height were also improved due to Azotobacter and Azospirillum culture combination”
Claim · model-written summary
Azotobacter and Azospirillum culture combination improved number of millable canes, girth and cane height of sugarcane.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- Azotobacter and Azospirillum culture combinatione2
- Interactor
- AzotobacterAzotobactere2symbiont
- Second interactor
- AzospirillumAzospirillume2symbiont
- Outcome
- number of millable canes, girth and cane heighte2
- Direction
- improvede2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“sugarcane (Saccharum oflcinarum)”
e2“The gemination. tillering, number of millable canes, girth and cane height were also improved due to Azotobacter and Azospirillum culture combination”
Claim · model-written summary
The maximum response was observed with Azotobncter + Azospirillum culture with nitrogen.
- Taxon
- sugarcanet0
- Treatment
- Azotobncter + Azospirillum culture with nitrogene3
- Outcome
- responsee3
- Direction
- Maximume3
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“sugarcane (Saccharum oflcinarum)”
e3“Maximum response was observed in Azotobncter + Azospirillum culture with nitrogen”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment saved 25-50 kg/ha of fertilizer N in sugarcane.
Verbatim
t0“sugarcane (Saccharum oflcinarum)”
e4“There was a saving of fertilizer N to the extent of 25-50 kgha and im- provement in soil properties”
Claim · model-written summary
The treatment improved soil properties.
Verbatim
t0“sugarcane (Saccharum oflcinarum)”
e4“There was a saving of fertilizer N to the extent of 25-50 kgha and im- provement in soil properties”
The same questions in other papers
Azotobacter · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
Azospirillum · growth · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results agree
3 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
nitrogen · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Results differ
117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
133 papers more in this group
See all 137 papers →inoculation · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results
46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
46 papers more in this group
See all 50 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.